@argome321,
I understand, or at least think I do, every sentiment and argument you are making, Arg. But I don't quite agree. And, because I don't I will be, and have routinely been, labeled as a "racist." While acknowledging the distaste and abhorrence that a given person, or group of persons, may have for any particular word, I don't quite agree with what you are suggesting when you say this:
Quote:A rose by any other name is still a rose.
You are quoting Shakespeare here of course, but his point is different. He's saying that changing the word used to refer to something cannot change what that thing is. I agree with that completely. So what "power" does a word have, beyond what any given person chooses to give it? Whatever I call you, good, bad, or indifferent will not change who/what you are.
If I call a beautiful woman an "ugly bitch," does that in any way change what she is? Of course not. It just reveals my bitterness, misogyny, or whatever subjective motives I may have for saying it, and no more.
Changing the word used cannot change the thing. And that includes real prejudice/racism. "Prohibiting" a racist from showing his stripes does NOT suddenly make him a "non-racist." It simply helps him conceal his true sentiments. And, as you note, it stifles HONEST discussion.