45
   

Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

 
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Sun 27 Oct, 2019 10:18 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
oralloy whines:

Don't be so dishonorable. There was no whining in my post.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Sun 27 Oct, 2019 10:31 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
You haven't rebutted anything,

Wrong again. I have rebutted your untrue claims about leftist judges, and I've rebutted your untrue claims about facts versus opinions.


MontereyJack wrote:
you've merely made assertions and claimed your opinions are facts.

I have never claimed that an opinion is a fact, and you cannot provide any examples of me doing so.


MontereyJack wrote:
And when pressed to provide facts to back up your opinions, you weaseled and claimed what you had presented as fact was in fact your opinion and opinions are neither true nor false so you didn't need to provide any evidence.

Wrong again. I've never presented an opinion as a fact.

Pointing out that opinions are neither true nor false is not weaseling. This is basic logic that you should have been required to demonstrate knowledge of before being allowed to graduate high school.

Side note: I can claim another prediction victory with my successful prediction that you would never actually ask me to back up a factual claim.


MontereyJack wrote:
you're shamming.

Wrong again. The only phony here is that fellow who keeps saying that he thinks what other people think.
TheCobbler
 
  3  
Reply Sun 27 Oct, 2019 10:57 am
Donald Trump lashes out
By Richard Galant / October 27, 2019



President Donald Trump dialed it up last week.

He referred to his potential impeachment by the House as a "lynching."

He called never-Trump Republicans "human scum."

He compared himself to George Washington and branded the emoluments clause of the Constitution "phony." Critics said Trump was wrong on each of these claims.

Quin Hillyer, a GOP "Never Trumper" who ordinarily writes for the Washington Examiner, called on Trump to restrain himself. In a CNN Opinion piece, Hillyer addressed the President: "You hurl insults almost indiscriminately, attack when you could be welcoming new allies, divide even when there's no need to conquer ... What's painful is not that you said it about us, but that any president besmirched the office we revere as the symbol of a great and good nation, by saying any such thing about fellow Americans merely for exercising their rights as citizens. It grieves us to see the presidency abased."

Emory University historian Jason Morgan Ward shed light on Trump's "lynching" claim: "One hundred years ago this September, a white mob in Omaha, Nebraska, set the local county courthouse ablaze to force authorities to turn over a black man named Will Brown. The vigilantes strung the prisoner from a telephone pole, riddled his body with hundreds of bullets, and dragged his corpse behind an automobile for several blocks. After dousing Brown's corpse in lantern oil, the mob set him on fire.

"Will Brown was a lynching victim. President Trump is not."

As for the George Washington comparison

Historian Jeremi Suri argued it was wildly off base.

Trump suggested that America's first President was running a business while president. "Trump concocted a very strange image of Washington possessing 'two desks ... a presidential desk and a business desk.' That is completely false. Washington had only one desk and he did not run a business or profit from his time as president. Washington would reject the self-dealing at the core of Trump's daily behavior."

Suri wrote, "Donald Trump is the first president to fully exploit the presidency for personal profit." (And, Dean Obeidallah pointed out, Trump's cancellation of plans to hold the G7 meeting at one of his Florida resorts doesn't mean he gets why that was a problem in the first place.)
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Sun 27 Oct, 2019 11:34 am
The Democrats' 100-year flood
Alexi McCammond

The midterm elections may have been a sign of what's ahead for the 2020 presidential election: experts say the voter turnout could be the highest in a century.

The big picture: According to Michael McDonald, an elections expert at the University of Florida, turnout for the 2020 presidential election could be as high as 67% — the highest it's been since at least 1916. If that happens, President Trump will have a tougher fight for a second term.

He's driving turnout among those most unhappy with him (younger voters and people of color) even when he's not on the ballot.
And Trump voters aren't a growing demographic group. The share of whites with less than a 4-year degree — Trump's constituency — dropped by 3% from 2014 to 2018.
Between the lines: McDonald is basing his prediction of "a hundred-year storm" on the 2018 midterms, which had the highest off-year election turnout in more than a century (50%). He says that momentum will only get stronger.

Prior to 2018, turnout rates for midterms since 1974 had been languishing around 40% to 41%.
"It doesn't seem to be the candidates who were running in 2018; there wasn't hyper competition driving turnout; some states made it easier to vote, but that can't explain it because the increase was happening in every state," McDonald said. "So the only explanation is Donald Trump because he’s the only major factor that’s changed in our politics since 2014."

Turnout in the 2016 presidential election was 60%.
"The safest prediction in politics is for a giant turnout in 2020," said Larry Sabato of the University of Virginia. "Nobody's going to believe the polls after 2016, and everyone will assume a tight race."

"Anti-Trump Democrats and the pro-Trump base will both set human adrenaline records — the intensity across the country is going to be spectacular. Let's hope the polling places can accommodate the crowds."
With that kind of increase, turnout rates would likely go up for everybody. But:

Older white people already tend to vote at high rates, and they're close to their maximum turnout already.
By contrast, you'll see bigger turnout increases among young people, people of color, and low-income people — generally important constituencies for the Democratic Party — because they vote in lower numbers.
From 2014 to 2018, turnout among whites with a 4-year degree went up 17%, while non-white voters' turnout increased by 15%.
Yes, but: There could be some increase among Trump voters, too. Turnout among whites without a 4-year degree went up by 12% in the same period. "I'd imagine these people are going to be activated in 2020 with Trump on the ballot," McDonald said.

While the country is becoming more diverse, it's also getting older, particularly in places like Ohio and throughout the Midwest, according to the 2020 Census Bureau projections.

That's another group that Trump tends to perform well with with, especially older white voters.
The Trump campaign isn't buying it. "Predicting turnout this far in advance of an election is a fool's errand," said campaign spokeswoman Kayleigh McEnany, noting that there's no sure way to know which voters will turn out.

The bottom line: For all of his struggles in the polls, Trump is the incumbent and he has a booming economy. But a historic election turnout could wipe out those advantages — and the early signs suggest that's exactly what we're about to get.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Sun 27 Oct, 2019 04:47 pm
@TheCobbler,
Laughing Laughing Laughing
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Sun 27 Oct, 2019 06:21 pm
@coldjoint,
remember ttrump lost the vote in 2016. he only won by about 60000 votes in swing states because fenerally ec votes are winner-take-all in most states. and early polling shows trump losng by substantial margins in swing states now. so early signs make your smly faces kda akn to whstng past a graveyard.
hingehead
 
  2  
Reply Sun 27 Oct, 2019 06:23 pm
Source

British Writer Pens The Best Description Of Trump I’ve Read
MARCH 8, 2019 ~ MICHAEL STEVENSON

Someone on Quora asked “Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?” Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England wrote the following response:

Quote:
A few things spring to mind.

Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.
For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace – all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.
So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing – not once, ever.
I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility – for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.

But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is – his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.

Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.

And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults – he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.

There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface.

Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.
Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.

And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.
Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that.
He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.

He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.

And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.
That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.

There are unspoken rules to this stuff – the Queensberry rules of basic decency – and he breaks them all. He punches downwards – which a gentleman should, would, could never do – and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless – and he kicks them when they are down.

So the fact that a significant minority – perhaps a third – of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think ‘Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:
• Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
• You don’t need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.

This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.
After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of ****. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.
God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.
In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws – he would make a Trump.

And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:
‘My God… what… have… I… created?
If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set.


Source: jobsanger: British Writer Pens The Best Description Of Trump I’ve Read
coldjoint
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Oct, 2019 06:32 pm
@hingehead,
From the country that bows to Islam. Consider the source.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Sun 27 Oct, 2019 07:17 pm
https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/sbr102719dAPR20191026124524.jpg
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Oct, 2019 08:57 pm
@coldjoint,
joint doesn't seem to have read beyond the headline.it was 47% he doesn't mention that the people who thought dems moved too far left were mostly, surprise, republicansit's pretty much counterbalanced by the 37% who tought republicans had moved too far to the right. And by the 51% who view. only 17% of dems thought so. Black people and Hispanics srongly disagreed. And by the 51% who viewed the republican arty unfavorably. Not good news fro repubs, joint. time to retract your smileys.
Quinnipiac poll
© Getty Images
Nearly half of respondents in a new poll said the Democratic Party has moved "too far left." 
The survey from Quinnipiac University Poll released Wednesday found that 47 percent of registered voters polled said the Democratic Party has moved “too far left;" however, most of those voters identified as Republicans.
The poll found that 79 percent of Republicans surveyed said the Democrats had moved too far left, but only 17 percent of Democrats agreed. Just under half, or 48 percent, of independents said the party has drifted too far left. 


There was also a gap by gender, with 57 percent of male respondents saying the party was too far to the left and only 37 percent of women saying the same. Similarly, the view was split by race, with 53 percent of white voters polled agreeing, 33 percent of Hispanic voters and just 17 percent of black voters. 
By contrast, 37 percent of respondents said the Republican Party had moved “too far right.” The poll found just 12 percent of Republicans agreed with the statement, but 58 percent of Democrats and 43 percent of independents agreed.
The look into how some Americans view the parties comes as more than a dozen Democrats seek the party nomination to take on President Trump in 2020. 
Progressive candidates Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) have built large grassroots followings while campaigning for some of the party’s most progressive policies.
Former Vice President Joe Biden, campaigning on a more moderate agenda, has also led the field with the progressive senators for much of the race to date.
The poll also found that the percentage of respondents who view the Democratic Party favorably has increased 3 points since August, from 38 percent to 41 percent. The amount who viewed it unfavorably remained steady at 47 percent. 


The percentage of respondents with a favorable view of the Republican Party jumped 1 point, from 34 percent to 35 percent in the same time frame, according to the poll. It also found the unfavorable rating dropped 2 points, from 53 percent to 51 percent
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Sun 27 Oct, 2019 09:53 pm
@MontereyJack,
Well, now I know. I also know that will not win the election in 2020, Trump will.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Oct, 2019 03:30 am
@coldjoint,
So trump goes to game 5 of the world series, sold0out crowd, He's introduced to the crowd and is greeted with a thunderous chorus of boos and chants of "lock him up", according to usa today. If he's boooed by a sports crowd, he's in deep trouble. wouldn't tske sny bets if I were you, joint.
Region Philbis
 
  0  
Reply Mon 28 Oct, 2019 06:32 am

https://imgur.com/GLxAPs3.jpg


Laughing
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  2  
Reply Mon 28 Oct, 2019 06:42 am
@MontereyJack,

snood
 
  3  
Reply Mon 28 Oct, 2019 06:45 am
@Region Philbis,
Couldn’t happen to a more deserving public servant.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 28 Oct, 2019 08:27 am
@oralloy,
Just another pack of opinions with no factual basis masquerading as facts, as always.
coldjoint
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Oct, 2019 09:52 am
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
a thunderous chorus of boos and chants of "lock him up",

There are always losers at a ball game.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Mon 28 Oct, 2019 10:35 am
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
remember ttrump lost the vote in 2016.

You keep pushing this fallacy, Trump won the vote that counts, the EC. The popular vote has nothing to do with who wins the election, it's a factoid like rushing yards in a football game. He won Constitutionally, that's why the left is no seeking to bypass the Constitution. When they lose by the rules, they change to rules so they can win, those are the types of moves made by fascists.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 28 Oct, 2019 10:37 am
@coldjoint,
Apparently the crowd of average Americans feel trump is a loser so you may have that right. Small comfort for you tho. 😄😄😄




Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Mon 28 Oct, 2019 10:44 am
@MontereyJack,
Sorry to say, but there typically isn't many "average" Americans who can afford a trip to a World Champion game of any type. Tickets are way to expensive and then dealing with the jacked up hotel rates in those cities hosting the events. Stubhub shows single tickets going for $600+. In DC those seats are going to be filled with the swamp people from K street.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.29 seconds on 11/24/2024 at 11:30:40