@hightor,
Quote:The regulations aren't imposed on industry to prevent the owners of the mines from making money for christ's sake, they're there to protect miners from unsafe working conditions and the public from the effects of pollution. If the industry demonstrated responsibility for the health of its workforce and and the quality of the environment we wouldn't need government regulation.
Health of the worker, do you really expect me to believe that? The left targets the things they don't like with laws and regulations while at the same time telling us it's for our own good... they lie!
Quote:Yes they did. The most productive coal seams were mined out in the Appalachians and the current process of extraction there is much more capital intensive. Automation has also replaced jobs in the east and in the big western strip mines.
That isn't true, the mines started shutting down after the regulations from the EPA, which specifillly targeted the coal industry, just like they tried to target the oil industry here in CO and failed. Just like leftists though, they are trying to go around the will of the people after the election. It's the same old crap from the anti-energy left.
Quote:Except that has nothing to do with my comment about truckers appropriating the name of the occupation they replaced.
What did that comment have to do with jobs changing?
Quote:Most people aren't in a position to see into the future and walk away from a good-paying job because they suspect it might not be there some time in the future.
People are smarter than you give them credit for. When the middle management jobs of the 80's started going away because of computers, what did they do? People shift into the new industries, except where it makes more sense to use tech instead of people. The days of fast food workers is coming to an end and mostly due to silly pay demands. $15hr to hand out burgers and fries?
Quote:Is it really so wrong to tap into the vast wealth of the country and temporarily help hardworking people who've lost their jobs through no fault of their own, maybe providing job training, relocation services, and loans?
It's never temporary though. Once we create a program it is impossible to end that program, in fact politicians and their flunkies will find a way to keep a worthless program going just for votes. We already have over 170 different social welfare programs in the US, to include numerous job training programs, how much more do you think we need?
Quote:What a bunch of niggardly skinflints.
It's sad that you think the money belongs to the govt and not the people who actually earned it, nothing is more noble than spending other people's money. You wonder why I question your resolve when it comes to capitalism?