50
   

Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

 
 
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 16 Apr, 2015 02:10 pm
@TheCobbler,
It is funny. Why is the govt taking this money from dead people? I don't care how much they are worth, it was theirs that they earned. They should be allowed to pass it along to their families if that is what they wish. The fact the govt thinks they have a right to it is the disgrace. It amounts to theft and you support that theft. What type of freedom is that?

You are the one who should be ashamed. The money isn't yours, what makes you think you can tell them they can't have it?
TheCobbler
 
  3  
Reply Thu 16 Apr, 2015 02:28 pm
https://scontent-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfa1/v/t1.0-9/11079660_10153167214752908_3371649048520600578_n.png?oh=ee03a29a09bf050c7240f40651c0b627&oe=559EDBBB
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  3  
Reply Thu 16 Apr, 2015 02:30 pm
@Baldimo,
Now one is saying they can't have this money "the people" are only saying it should be taxed like poor people are taxed...

This inequality is the source of YOUR shame not mine...

I guess it is above your ability to understand that taxes should be fair.
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 16 Apr, 2015 02:39 pm
@TheCobbler,
Taxed like poor people are taxed? You mean you want to take the CG tax and turn it into a regular tax? That has nothing to do with the inheritance tax.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Reply Thu 16 Apr, 2015 02:40 pm
@Baldimo,
I pointed out Bob's claim was just as ridiculous as yours.

I am still waiting for you to back up your claim.


Rex claimed 60% in 4 years. You list 8% increase in 1 year as your evidence he is wrong? Really. And you think he is a joke?
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 16 Apr, 2015 02:47 pm
@parados,
Quote:
You list 8% increase in 1 year as your evidence he is wrong? Really. And you think he is a joke?


I pulled that from the link YOU provided as his proof. You didn't seem fit to provide the information you were backing either. I had to look and that was what the report YOU provided found. Not my fault the info you provided was faulty, maybe you should provide better proof then just posting a link you found on Google.
parados
 
  4  
Reply Thu 16 Apr, 2015 03:00 pm
@Baldimo,
No, that is NOT what the report said about a 3 year time frame. Read the report before you make yourself look like such an idiot.

This is what the link I gave says about a 3 year time frame. The do some really big numbers in a graphic on page 15.
1.6 million in 2010. 2.5 million in 2013. I'll let you do the math.

Next you are going to tell me the stock market didn't go up 12% last year because it has only gone up 1% so far this year. Drunk
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 16 Apr, 2015 06:43 pm
@parados,
The Stock Market didn't go up 12% this past year. Unless you count the S&P 500 as the entire stock market.

Quote:
For the year, the Dow ended up 7.5 percent, notching its sixth straight annual gain, and the Nasdaq rose 13.4 percent. The best-performing S&P component in 2014 was Southwest Airlines Co (LUV.N) up 124.6 percent, while Transocean Ltd (RIG.N), down 62.9 percent, was the worst.


Quote:
Still, the S&P 500 has risen in seven of the past ten sessions, hitting a series of intraday and closing records, and finished the year up 11.4 percent. The stock market will be closed Thursday.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/12/31/us-markets-stocks-usa-idUSKBN0K90P420141231

Tell me again about your flawless stats and the demand I account for every percent I mention?
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Fri 17 Apr, 2015 09:08 am
Hey GOP, look! Medicaid and Medicare keep costs down better than private insurance
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/04/16/1378163/-Hey-GOP-look-Medicaid-and-Medicare-keep-costs-down-better-than-private-insurance
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Reply Fri 17 Apr, 2015 09:28 am
@Baldimo,
I see... you are going to complain that 11.4% isn't 12% but you still can't give us any evidence of your 50% pay no taxes statement?

My 12% was simply an example of how your use of 1 year doesn't prove anything about the previous 4. But rather than just admit you were wrong you are going to go all idiotic. OK. Still waiting for your evidence of the 50% pay no taxes since you want to be "exact" in your stats.
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 17 Apr, 2015 10:00 am
@parados,
My links were provided several pages ago. You didn't read them, that isn't my fault.

Quote:
I see... you are going to complain that 11.4% isn't 12% but you still can't give us any evidence of your 50% pay no taxes statement?


The stock market didn't go up 12% or even 11.4%, did you bother to read what I posted or you just guessing again? The S&P went up that much, but not the standard stock market. There is a difference and it's sad that you don't know the difference.
parados
 
  5  
Reply Fri 17 Apr, 2015 10:21 am
@Baldimo,
The standard stock market? Market refers to several different things. You can use any one of a number of different indices when referring to the market. Hell, I could have been referring to the tech sector index as far as you know. The point is that you can't use one time period to claim a longer time period didn't have a certain change.

No, you didn't provide any evidence a few pages ago. We originally got into this discussion on page 20 of this thread. You quickly changed the subject when I challenged you to provide links.
http://able2know.org/topic/267070-20

On page 22 you commented that we still hadn't recovered to pre-recession levels. I asked what you were referring to and you never responded to back up that statement.
You also made a comment on how Reid was blocking all the bills passed by the House. I pointed out it wasn't all and that the House didn't vote on several Senate bills and that you couldn't put the failure to act completely on the Senate leader.

You also claimed you could prove the 50% figure
http://able2know.org/topic/267070-22#post-5932925


Page 23, you provide no evidence but post about Cobbler's lack of facts.


Page 24, you again provide no evidence to back up the 50% figure you said you could prove. I post a link that provided evidence to support what Cobbler had posted. You then attempt to make 1 year from my link evidence that his claim about 4 years was wrong.


Page 25. You lie to me and tell me you posted evidence to support your 50% claim and all I have to do is go back and look. I didn't read them because they don't exist. Care to try this again? Please provide your links to back up your statement.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Fri 17 Apr, 2015 11:28 am
@parados,
The links were then posted in another thread, that is my bad for assuming.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/fact-checking-romneys-47-percent-comment/

So much fact checking of me but no one on "your side" of the isle. To bad you can't apply this equally.
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Fri 17 Apr, 2015 11:46 am
Resolution to kill D.C. LGBT rights bill introduced in House
http://www.washingtonblade.com/2015/04/16/resolution-to-kill-d-c-lgbt-rights-bill-introduced-in-house/

http://www.washingtonblade.com/content/files/2015/04/Vicky_Hartzler_insert_c_Washington_Blade_by_Michael_Key.jpg
Who are the "wankers" here?

0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  3  
Reply Fri 17 Apr, 2015 12:00 pm
https://scontent-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xaf1/v/t1.0-9/11156332_1125433740816573_3188211155172785677_n.jpg?oh=ce9bbdd6fa658913b305ff34f0248f1b&oe=559D6416
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Fri 17 Apr, 2015 12:11 pm
Republican repeal of estate tax a big tax break to rich freeloaders
http://egbertowillies.com/2015/04/17/republican-repeal-of-estate-tax-a-big-tax-break-to-rich-freeloaders/

http://egbertowillies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/16673023736_8ff33fabd8_z-e1429283370717.jpg
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Fri 17 Apr, 2015 12:20 pm
Indianapolis Business Journal Reveals The ‘Real’ Reason WIBC Dropped GOP Extremist Rush Limbaugh
http://samuel-warde.com/2015/04/the-real-reason-wibc-dropped-gop-extremist-rush-limbaugh/

Sadly the bottom line is money and not to promote ethical journalism of which Rush has never been ethical.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Reply Fri 17 Apr, 2015 12:32 pm
@Baldimo,
Which only confirms my statement that the 47% pay no taxes is the same as 60% of the budget is for military. Both statements pretend less than 50% of a total is the total.

Read your link. It states 47% pay no INCOME tax. Income tax makes up less than 50% of Federal revenues.


https://static.nationalpriorities.org/images/fb101/2014/projected-tax-revenue.png

0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Fri 17 Apr, 2015 12:33 pm
Republican Paul Ryan Protects Rapists’ Rights in New Fetus Bill
http://www.politicususa.com/2013/01/14/paul-ryan-protects-rapists-rights-fetus-bill.html

"rapists and rights" are an oxymoron like Paul Ryan
http://i2.wp.com/www.politicususa.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Screen-Shot-2013-01-14-at-4.08.51-PM-1.jpg
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Reply Fri 17 Apr, 2015 12:33 pm
@TheCobbler,
The House didn't repeal anything. They voted to repeal it but a bill passing in one house doesn't do anything since it isn't law.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.24 seconds on 06/01/2024 at 04:32:55