Mean, spiteful, vindictive and completely pathetic

@FOUND SOUL,

FOUND SOUL wrote:

I beg your pardon? 1) Such detail there over her death.

All my facts are in order. Guede's DNA in her vagina, and the sperm stain under her corpse, indicate that he raped her.

The blood spatter on her clothes indicates that she was still fully clothed when her throat was cut. The blood spatter on her bare chest indicates that she was still alive and spraying blood after being undressed. That is clear evidence that the rape took place while blood was spraying from her throat (not before or after).

That Kercher died a slow death while trapped in her room is covered well by all the forensics. That Guede was out dancing in a nightclub while she died is well-attested by the people who were at the nightclub.

FOUND SOUL wrote:

2) Karma at its best ?

Yes. There is something pleasing about the fact that all of these horrible lies about Amanda and Raffaele have actually resulted in Guede's sentence being slashed, first from LIFE to 30 years, and then further yet to 16 years.

Maybe you guys will stand as an example to the future, showing subsequent generations why they should think twice before they go around lynching innocent people.

FOUND SOUL wrote:

The mere fact that you think like that tells me a lot.

You're the one who is building up negative Karma by horribly slandering innocent people.

I can't tell you what, if anything, comes after death. But I'm sure glad that I'm the one who is defending innocent people here.

FOUND SOUL wrote:

She Meredith was in a non committed relationship, hardly suggests being a slut.

The term is whore. And that relationship involved her getting drugs in exchange for weird sex acts.

Quote:

As he [Cocciaretto] frequented the house, he had seen Rudy there two or three times, and on one of these occasions Amanda and Meredith were also present; Rudy spoke with both of then and on one occasion he confided to [Cocciaretto] that he liked Amanda.

It is scary to contemplate that Guede broke in because he was after Amanda instead of Kercher. I'm glad Amanda was out with her boyfriend at the time.

FOUND SOUL wrote:

I suggest you keep reading up on the case.

I remind you that I already know every fact about this case.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Let me put it this way.

The Amanda Knox thread died on its butt and you want it revived and continued in conversation because you don't give a rats about Meredith or her family or all that slow dripping blood and her slowly dying, whilst he partied on after at a night club, in-fact you find it awesome and Karma that he only got 16 years.

I got it.

And, no I have no intention of replying further here so you can continue with your thread.

Meredith was a "person" a human being, young. Her death was horrific. She is a victim.

It's clear to see how your mind works but in addition the other reason why I refuse to continue here in conversation with you, is also as simple.

Childish behaviour in tagging Eh-Beth in such a manner is as much as a disgrace as your inability to have feelings for a murdered victim and their family, choosing instead to focus on a living human being that has not proven she is innocent or it would not still be going.

Enjoy.

1 Reply

@FOUND SOUL,

FOUND SOUL wrote:

Let me put it this way.
The Amanda Knox thread died on its butt and you want it revived and continued in conversation

Actually the thread is merely dormant. It will revive on its own when the case comes back into the news.

I did think it most appropriate, if we were to discuss the case, to discuss it there however. Other people who have an interest in the case might have been able to chime in with their own two cents. But I'm perfectly able to discuss the facts of this case on any thread.

I might also object if your discussion of the case were running someone's thread off topic. But no worries about that here on this thread.

So all in all, here was fine.

FOUND SOUL wrote:

because you don't give a rats about Meredith or her family or all that slow dripping blood and her slowly dying,

I'm too busy defending the victims from your horrible lies. No time to worry about Kercher scum when I have to spend every effort worrying about the victims.

FOUND SOUL wrote:

in-fact you find it awesome and Karma that he only got 16 years.

If you don't want to suffer Karmic backlash for your atrocities, then don't commit atrocities.

FOUND SOUL wrote:

I got it.
And, no I have no intention of replying further here so you can continue with your thread.

You've found yourself unable to argue against the facts, and so you are going to storm off in a huff.

FOUND SOUL wrote:

LMeredith was a "person" a human being, young. Her death was horrific.

Her death was beyond horrific. And you helped her killer get a light sentence.

I'm sure glad I'm not on the wrong side of Karma. (We need an emote where the smiley is wiping his brow with relief.)

FOUND SOUL wrote:

She is a victim.

No. The victims in this case are Amanda and Raffaele.

FOUND SOUL wrote:

It's clear to see how your mind works

Yes. I relentlessly defend your victims from the ravages of your horrible lies.

FOUND SOUL wrote:

but in addition the other reason why I refuse to continue here in conversation with you, is also as simple.
Childish behaviour in tagging Eh-Beth in such a manner is as much as a disgrace as your inability to have feelings for a murdered victim and their family,

No. The only reason why you are refusing to continue the conversation is you've suddenly discovered that all the facts are against you.

And the childish behavior came from ehBeth, with her unprovoked act of aggression against me. I was merely defending myself from that unprovoked act of aggression.

FOUND SOUL wrote:

choosing instead to focus on a living human being that has not proven she is innocent

Now you are being outright dishonest. The fact that there is no evidence against Amanda or Raffaele, and the fact that there is strong evidence that Guede committed the crime alone, very much proves that Amanda and Raffaele are innocent.

Remember that Karma thing. Your horrible lies about Amanda and Raffaele are the very reason why Guede has such a short sentence.

FOUND SOUL wrote:

or it would not still be going.

The fact that thugs like you intentionally make false accusations against people is hardly evidence against their innocence.

FOUND SOUL wrote:

Enjoy.

I would have enjoyed it more had you possessed honor and integrity.

Oh well. I'm enjoying the Karma.

Thinking on how brutal Guede was with Kercher, I can't wait to see what he'll do once he is back out on the streets with all those nice young college girls.

Chop chop chop. Cool

1 Reply

Honestly Oral boy. Do you even HAVE a life? I mean, over 200 threads tagged. And the number of recent replies has been astounding. I think you need to move out of Spendi's basement. Seriously - get some help.

1 Reply

@Wilso,

Wilso wrote:

Honestly Oral boy.

It's a shame that you can't contribute anything other than childish name-calling.

Wilso wrote:

Do you even HAVE a life?

Yes.

Wilso wrote:

I mean, over 200 threads tagged.

No big deal. That was easily done. It was actually slower going when I was removing the tags.

Wilso wrote:

And the number of recent replies has been astounding.

Now you're just being preposterous.

Wilso wrote:

I think you need to move out of Spendi's basement.

Spendi had honor and integrity. You don't.

Wilso wrote:

Seriously - get some help.

It might be nice if some of you thugs started having a bit of honor and integrity. If someone were able to help seed those traits in you, that would be useful.

Other than that though, I've no need for any assistance.

0 Replies

Darn, I wish I knew more about this storyline at the A2K soap opera.

Gotta say, Bethhasherpes was inventive and interesting if nothing else. And I have a feeling I would not be too happy with its author if I understood what was going on in its creation.

1 Reply

@hawkeye10,

hawkeye10 wrote:

Darn, I wish I knew more about this storyline at the A2K soap opera.

I thought you did know. Most of it took place on your gun control thread.

Farmerman went into tantrum mode and started vomiting insults instead of conversing. He remains in tantrum mode still.

ehBeth then added a tag that falsely accused me of lying, and refused to justify her attack or discuss any fact of mine that she might have a complaint about.

I then fired back in self defense.

I must say, the Liberals are really freaking up the place. Not all of them of course; there are a few Liberals who still engage in reasoned discourse. But for the most part the Liberals have destroyed all the intellectual qualities that a2k once had.

2 Replies

@oralloy,

Quote:

Farmerman went into tantrum mode and started vomiting insults instead of conversing. He remains in tantrum mode still.

I thought it was drinking.....I dont get him, we have perfectly good talks on stuff like science and tankless water heaters and then he randomly goes off on me, even worse than CI. Last time it was over an attempt on my part to give him a chuckle over food quality at his thanksgiving charity event. BAM! He goes off on me in at least 3 threads.

And I am pretty sure Beth is talking herself into leaving A2K for good, she went off on me last week for no reason the first time ever. Normally she seems so chill and worldly. Her husband is an asshole but that is another story.

As much as I pop on and off here I really am getting busy with the restaurant again, I miss a lot these days.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Quote:

I must say, the Liberals are really freaking up the place. Not all of them of course; there are a few Liberals who still engage in reasoned discourse. But for the most part the Liberals have destroyed all the intellectual qualities that a2k once had.

Well, that is why I left that tent, I could not stand the bossing around and the hypocrisy. I was once an enviromentalist and a feminist, you might on any given day find me burning a prairie or sitting in a dyke bar as part of a conversation on how the patriarchy sucks, but I changed when my bullshit detector started going off a lot.

Thing that surprised me most after I left though is that the conservatives that I run into seem to be more not caring race and more accepting of people as individuals and on their own merit no matter what groups they are a part of than the liberals are, the ones who keep running their mouths about this stuff. I did not expect that. And I am not a conservative, I am non aligned, I will hang out with anyone who will have me.

0 Replies

@FOUND SOUL,

Oralboy knows Knox is guilty, that's what excites him he's got a thing about sexual violence. He fantasises about killing babies, and on another thread accused other posters of being paedophiles, but when he did it he was very specific about times, places, ages of victims. In short the sort of detail that would be included if someone had perpetrated, witnessed of experienced abuse.

What worries me is that this creature has a gun, and that at some point in the future we'll be reading about a load of murders its committed.

If nothing else, there is now no doubt as to exactly what sort of creature Oralboy is.

0 Replies

@hawkeye10,

I am convinced that you are slightly autistic Hawkee. When you made those insulting comments to me inferring how "charity meals are usually crap". You don't realize how you are able to hurt people. I took that psonally an was a bit insulted.
The fact that you cannot empathize about how others perceive thee insults , to me, shouts out that you are displaying one of several "autism associated tics"

My opinion of you has changed over the years . I now picture you as a high function "Munchie" who doesn't have any ability to discuss nuances of things or fin details, instead I picture you shouting out discussion items like "Rainman".

Oral just flat out lives a lie in almost everything he states. His "us v Them" menatality goes as far as to have him suggest that people who don't fully buy his crap should lose their rights. (Seems that type of governance had been tried elswehere in the past to not much success)
My last dealing with him was when I pointed out how Pa Republican Representative blew his cover and announced (ON CAMERA). about why the GOP was pushing for voter Id. (It was to deliver the Pa state vote count to the Romney camp)>
Oral tried and tried to spin that hen the actual statement ws on tape and was printed verbatim in the paper.
So he immediately went on a seris of wrong headed rants about me and Democrats.
It was funny reading his open lying and trying to get people to believe that he "deals in facts".

He then ignored me and took off on someone else and started a really childish attack on a member and was probably punished with a temporary banning from the boards. (Or else he was so embarrassed that he voluntarily left for about a week). This was my last encounter with him an I said that hed never acted as wacky before . I always disagree with him re gun control, but his interpretation of what Id sai is miscast purposely so he can make fun of someone .

I asked him about several potential gun checks (like reporting stolen guns to police). I asked him what he thought about these potential ordinances and he came bak with a really strange rponse that he wants to ait until he hears what GOP party easerdhip says.
In other words, hes admitted that hes the big GOP KOOL AID guzzler and he has the balls to try to paint the other side??
Hes a total jack off and I think Ill just keep him in a spcial drawer of sock-puppet wackos like Quahog.

1 Reply

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

Oral just flat out lives a lie in almost everything he states.

Says the clown who can't point out a single fact that I am wrong about.

farmerman wrote:

His "us v Them" menatality goes as far as to have him suggest that people who don't fully buy his crap should lose their rights.

Sending you Freedom Haters to Guantanamo, so that you can sit in a cell next to your terrorist buddies, is a way of protecting America's freedom.

farmerman wrote:

My last dealing with him was when I pointed out how Pa Republican Representative blew his cover and announced (ON CAMERA). about why the GOP was pushing for voter Id. (It was to deliver the Pa state vote count to the Romney camp)

You took his comments way out of context and added words that he did not say, making it sound like he said something far different from what he meant.

farmerman wrote:

Oral tried and tried to spin that

All I did was point out the truth about what the guy really meant.

farmerman wrote:

So he immediately went on a seris of wrong headed rants about me and Democrats.

You are the only person here who went on a ranting spree.

farmerman wrote:

It was funny reading his open lying and trying to get people to believe that he "deals in facts".

Says the clown who can't show a single fact that I'm wrong about.

You really should post a picture of yourself in the clown outfit that you wear when you make these posts.

Laughing

farmerman wrote:

He then ignored me and

I answered every post that had a relevant point. Mostly that involved pointing out what a total clown you are for making empty accusations of lies when you can't even point out any facts that I am wrong about.

farmerman wrote:

and took off on someone else and started a really childish attack on a member

ehBeth started the really childish attack against me. I merely defended myself.

farmerman wrote:

I asked him about several potential gun checks (like reporting stolen guns to police). I asked him what he thought about these potential ordinances and he came bak with a really strange rponse that he wants to ait until he hears what GOP party easerdhip says.

I said nothing about the GOP.

farmerman wrote:

In other words, hes admitted that hes the big GOP KOOL AID guzzler and he has the balls to try to paint the other side??

As previously reported, I am immune to all Kool Aid.

farmerman wrote:

Hes a total jack off

Farmerman engages in name-calling because he has no ability to make a positive contribution to a thread.

1 Reply

@oralloy,

Take a good look at the douchebags giving you a hard time. It really isn't worth it. They all say the same thing. Narrow minded fools that think the majority of people live in a dream world.

They don't have the guts to even admit they have an enemy that will hate them no matter what they think. In fact they have a few, unless they are somehow connected.

They refuse to exercise or permit the exercising of debate on a factual, statistical basis. And these are the arm chair scientists that are sure the world will choke on carbon.

The Hell with them. Keep posting.

2 Replies

@coldjoint,

You have no problem with a guy who posts a color picture of a murder victim's slashed throat and chortles about her death? This particular objection has nothing to do with politics. It has everything to do with decency. The execution of a vicious murderer is a matter of justice, and the death of a tyrant is often a cause for celebration. But those are extreme situations that are few and far between when compared to the deaths of most people. Oralloy has shown himself to be a barbarian. My objection to him has nothing to do with politics. I still know little about the Amanda Knox case, but I recognize barbarity when I see it.

Besides, as if you haven't already noticed, I'm not a part of the majority who dominate these forums. I certainly don't feel welcomed. In fact, I know I shouldn't be here. If I had more sense, I wouldn't have gotten involved in this latest A2K soap opera.

Coldjoint, please look beyond the politics. Careful when you choose your allies. The enemy of your enemy isn't necessarily your friend. Sometimes an ally turns out to be an embarrassment.

2 Replies

@wmwcjr,

Quote:

Coldjoint, please look beyond the politics. Careful when you choose your allies. The enemy of your enemy isn't necessarily your friend.

Frankly, I do not need any allies. That wasn't the purpose of my post. No matter how unpleasant someone is, it has little to do with the facts of the matters discussed on this forum.

And to watch that group of frustrated, emasculated Blowholes gang up on anyone is all anyone should need to see what they are is no better in anyway shape or form.

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

-2, c'mon girls, you can do better than that.

http://www.alien-earth.org/images/smileys/jesusvomit.jpg

1 Reply

@oralloy,

oralloy wrote:

Chop chop chop.

Sick sick sick. Evil or Very Mad

Sicko. Your sickness has nothing to do with politics.

No doubt if you had been living in London during the 1880's, the escapades of Jack the Ripper would have sent you into orgasmic ecstasies. After all, most (if not all) of the murder victims were "only" prostitutes.

You sound like the stereotypical immature adolescence "living in his mother's basement." Another Internet "tough guy," a keyboard commando. Rolling Eyes

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

I understand your frustration with the anonymity of the thumbing down feature. I don't like it, either.

0 Replies

@coldjoint,

coldjoint wrote:

Take a good look at the douchebags giving you a hard time. It really isn't worth it. They all say the same thing. Narrow minded fools that think the majority of people live in a dream world.

In my view there is no difference between a Liberal and the terrorists who flew planes into the World Trade Center.

However, these scumbags are all but defeated. They're just too stupid to realize it yet.

The 2013 gun control debacle is ultimately going to hand the White House to the Republicans in 2016. And if you look at the ages of the Supreme Court justices, you can see that we're at the beginning of a strong rightward shift for America.

0 Replies

@wmwcjr,

wmwcjr wrote:

You have no problem with a guy who posts a color picture of a murder victim's slashed throat and chortles about her death?

You neglected to mention the fact that I was entirely justified in making that post.

Odds have dropped quite a bit, but I still think there is a small chance that I will have cause to post that very same picture here in this thread.

wmwcjr wrote:

Oralloy has shown himself to be a barbarian.

It is safe to say that it is a bad idea to persecute an innocent person in my presence. I defend innocent people with even greater ferocity than I defend myself. And this very thread is tribute to the ferocity with which I defend myself.

But think about it from the perspective of the victims. If some scumbags were in the process of lynching you, you might be grateful to have someone pulling no punches in your defense.

wmwcjr wrote:

My objection to him has nothing to do with politics.

If you have an objection to me, have you ever considered discussing it with me?

It could result in an interesting conversation.

wmwcjr wrote:

I still know little about the Amanda Knox case, but I recognize barbarity when I see it.

How come you never seem to recognize barbarity in the posts that I am responding to?

My barbarous posts are not made in a vacuum you know.

wmwcjr wrote:

Besides, as if you haven't already noticed, I'm not a part of the majority who dominate these forums. I certainly don't feel welcomed. In fact, I know I shouldn't be here.

That you are not a member of the pack of scumbags is something to be proud of.

But for some reason you sometimes try to join them when they are attacking someone other than yourself.

I urge you to be stronger, and to reject the scumbags no matter the circumstance.

1 Reply

Mean, spiteful, vindictive and completely pathetic

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know