18
   

Torture, It's What's For Breakfast (and Lunch and Supper)

 
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 15 Dec, 2014 02:51 pm
@revelette2,
Quote:
Like they need any more reasons, we have given them plenty over the years since 9/11.


How dare us try to stop animals from killing religious minorities. And terrorizing their own.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 15 Dec, 2014 03:07 pm
Yeah lets hear it for Islam. What do you people think we are fighting? Do you see any courtesy, or thought of mercy, from them? I don't.

Where do you rank torture with beheading children? If it takes torture to end this eternal war Islam waging, then it takes torture.http://www.alien-earth.org/images/smileys/headbang.gif
0 Replies
 
revelette2
 
  4  
Reply Mon 15 Dec, 2014 03:59 pm
@Baldimo,
Quote:
That is laughable. We gave them reason to attack us, but I'm sure in your eyes, we had no reason to go after them in the first place. Terrorist apologist?


You really should refrain from putting words in my posts. Like many, I supported the war in Afghanistan, it just quickly went the wrong way with the torture and then doing an unnecessary U-turn into Iraq. Those are the actions which have done us no favors in creating new terrorists.
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 15 Dec, 2014 04:12 pm
@revelette2,
Quote:
in creating new terrorists.


Islam creates more terrorists. The US is just another enemy, as other non Muslim countries, on their list that began 1400 years ago.
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  4  
Reply Mon 15 Dec, 2014 06:14 pm
@giujohn,
Screw you. You claimed I was posting lies. YOU POST A FACT THAT PROVES I LIED AND I WILL REBUT IT. Ive been here too long to be dragged into a discussion with someone who is too lazy to prove their statements as you seem to be.
jcboy
 
  5  
Reply Mon 15 Dec, 2014 08:20 pm
The world has traditionally expected a certain purity from America. This is disgraceful and shameful, yet other countries have little room to complain.

America has always been the good guys until Bush/Cheney. Now we are all nasty.
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 15 Dec, 2014 08:26 pm
@RABEL222,

YOU WROTE: even though he was mentally incompentent.

I WROTE: (cough)MORE BULLSHIT(cough)


YOU WROTE: Prove he wasent. I can prove that his wife was the acting president for the last of his presidency and would if you will read it.


I WROTE: Ok lets see it

THEN YOU WROTE:

Quote:
Screw you. You claimed I was posting lies. YOU POST A FACT THAT PROVES I LIED AND I WILL REBUT IT. Ive been here too long to be dragged into a discussion with someone who is too lazy to prove their statements as you seem to be.


Now lets see if I have this right.

You claim to have proof then offer to show it, then I say ok show me, then you say, "screw you"?

Sooo... I take it you couldnt find this "proof", huh? LOL
oralloy
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 15 Dec, 2014 09:05 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:
There is a slight problem with your argument.
War crimes like torture have no statute of limitations. The crimes you are accusing Clinton would probably all be long past their time limit to prosecute. You can't charge Clinton with anything under the law.


http://able2know.org/topic/261929-1#post-5837044
oralloy wrote:
Actually I think it's about time Congress adjusted the statute of limitations and appointed another special prosecutor for Bill Clinton.

bump
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 15 Dec, 2014 09:30 pm
I can see by the numbers that Islam is still untouchable. When are you going to admit the ideology is impossible to separate from the religion. It is a burden Muslims cannot change because it(the religion) centers on the Koran, the sunnah and Hadith, and Sharia. And all those sources say Islam is the last word of God and unchangable. Hence their eternal war.

Again, an enemy that will stop at nothing. It does not matter how it is stopped.
http://www.alien-earth.org/images/smileys/death2.gif
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  2  
Reply Tue 16 Dec, 2014 01:39 am
@giujohn,
Where is your proof. Until you submit it I will not converse with you. This is my last post with you until I get it.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  0  
Reply Tue 16 Dec, 2014 11:27 am
@revelette2,
When did COngress declare war?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Reply Tue 16 Dec, 2014 12:16 pm
@woiyo,
woiyo wrote:

What would the point be in "prosecuting" anyone in the Bush administration for war crimes?



Under International law if a country doesn't prosecute such acts then the International Court can bring charges.
parados
 
  3  
Reply Tue 16 Dec, 2014 12:18 pm
@oralloy,

oralloy wrote:
Actually I think it's about time Congress adjusted the statute of limitations and appointed another special prosecutor for Bill Clinton.

I guess if the US Constitution means nothing to you then you could propose that. However under our system of government attempting to do such a thing would be invalidated by the courts.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 16 Dec, 2014 12:21 pm
@parados,

Quote:
I guess if the US Constitution means nothing to you


The Constitution means nothing to the jerk you support. He has proven it over and over. Find some other lie, for a change.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 16 Dec, 2014 12:23 pm
@parados,
Quote:
Under International law

International law is non binding. So you mean if someone wants to start a witch hunt, they can.
parados
 
  2  
Reply Tue 16 Dec, 2014 12:25 pm
@coldjoint,
Please point to the specific phrase of the US Constitution that you think Obama is or has violated. Then we can compare your argument to case law. I guarantee you won't present a single thing that isn't vague or clearly Constitutional.
coldjoint
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Dec, 2014 12:28 pm
@parados,
Quote:
US Constitution that you think Obama is or has violated.


Please point to one he hasn't. And this is not about the fuckface in the WH.
parados
 
  2  
Reply Tue 16 Dec, 2014 12:29 pm
@coldjoint,
It seems you don't know ****, Pinkie. Treaties ratified by the US are considered US law. I wonder if you want Obama to uphold all laws?
parados
 
  2  
Reply Tue 16 Dec, 2014 12:30 pm
@coldjoint,
As I expected. You can't point to any single instance that is supported by facts.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.24 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 10:12:07