@FBM,
Well, with Ross and Austing its a story fabricated in HELL. These guys, both initially closet Creationists, saw their way through grad school and acquired advanced degrees by keeping their heads down an agreeing with the scientific method. So when they were done with their dissertations and committee defenses, they would immediately turn on science as if they were able to see "flaws" . All the while, they knew they were going that way.
Ross did his MS and Phd in species v stratigraphy of Mososaurian marine reptiles (oceanic dinosaurs who, if the K?T bolide idnt hit, woulda probably been an entirely different class of reptiles.
All along Ross followed the "K/T" timeline without denying it.
Austing, nother one, got his dissertation approved on a subject of radiological "pleiochroism" which is a reaction ring that occurs in specific minerals that host radioactive elements in their crystals.
fter his dissertation, Austing announced his Creationist mindset and began howling about how these "reaction rings" , actually show how the mineral is very young (geologically) His "calculations" all conveniently encircle an age date of roughly 6000 BC.
His arguments are easily disassembled with simple algebra, but hes like gungasnake, being totally screwed up doesn't stop his preaching to the crowds in church fellowship halls.
Im incredulous as to how these guys can keep this crap going in their minds.