25
   

1 in 5 women get raped?

 
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 12:03 pm
infographics on sexual violence in college (trigger warning)
1 in 5 Women Is Sexually Assaulted in College. Just 1 Percent of Attackers Are Punished.

. . . . .
However, recent research shows that the broad contours of the environment described at UVA—where women report widespread sexual assault with no consequences for perpetrators—is not unique on America's college campuses. As one expert told RS contributing editor Sabrina Rubin Erdely, "the depressing reality is that UVA's situation is likely the norm."

Some of the best data on the prevalence of rape and other forms of sexual assault on campus comes from a 2007 survey of nearly 5,400 undergraduate women at two large public universities. The study, funded by the Department of Justice's National Institute of Justice, found "women at universities are at considerable risk for experiencing sexual assault." (The study defined sexual assault as not only rape but other unwanted sexual contact.)

A 2009 follow-up study by the same researchers found that by the time they are seniors, 1 in 5 undergraduate women report experiencing sexual assault since they started college. (In contrast, 4 percent of the survey's male respondents said that they'd been sexually assaulted in college.) That figure mirrors recent findings that 19 percent of women in the United States have been raped during their lifetimes.

The NIJ-funded study also examined the circumstances and risk factors surrounding sexual assault on campus, including the role of alcohol and fraternities. Nearly 60 percent of campus sexual-assault victims were under the influence of booze or drugs when they were attacked; one-fourth said their assailant was a frat member. Gang rapes like the one described in Rolling Stone appear to be relatively uncommon; most assaults involve a single assailant whom the
victim previously knew. Combined with findings from other studies on frats and rape prevention strategies, this data provides a overview of sexual violence on campus—and how rarely it is fully investigated.

www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/12/campus-sexual-assault-rape-stats-charts

http://www.motherjones.com/files/campusSA-1%20in%205%20women_0.png

http://www.motherjones.com/files/campusSA-chart.png

http://www.motherjones.com/files/campusSA-first%20two.png

http://www.motherjones.com/files/campusSA-perpetrators_0.png

http://www.motherjones.com/files/campusSA-stranger2.png

http://www.motherjones.com/files/campusSA-frat%20member_0.png

http://www.motherjones.com/files/campusSA-frat2.png

http://www.motherjones.com/files/campusSA-prevention.png

http://www.motherjones.com/files/campusSA-reporting_0.png

http://www.motherjones.com/files/campusSA-consequence.png
maxdancona
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 12:10 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
This is propaganda. These are not facts, they are ideological beliefs.

You believe them because they match your personal political bias. Even if you were willing to listen to the criticisms of this number (which I am not sure that you have) you probably aren't able to take them seriously because they go against your pre-held beliefs. It is not intellectually honest to accept evidence that supports your biases and ignore any contrary evidence.

There is quite a bit of valid scientific criticism of the study you are citing. The study was designed to reach a specific conclusion... and it succeeded at reaching the conclusion they wanted. There are plenty of other evidence that contradicts these results. Studies that ask women directly if they have been victims (rather than inferring from indirect questions) give much lower numbers. Bureau of Justice statistics also strongly suggest that this number is much higher than reality.

There are significant methodological issues in this study. The study writers didn't publish their metrics or their raw data (which makes it difficult to independently verify). And questions included ambiguous questions that would be unclear to anyone. And, there was a very low response rate which was addressed with a financial payout.

Once you have a political ideology, I suppose the facts don't matter.

For the record, I am not supporting either side in this fight. I think BillRM and Hawkeye are just as extreme and ideological on this issue as anyone on the feminist side.

The point is if people look for facts, rather than scoring political points... and if people accept facts whether they support their personal biases or not, it would be much easier to have a balanced reasonable discussion.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  3  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 01:19 pm

By Rolling Stone | December 5, 2014

To Our Readers:

Last month, Rolling Stone published a story titled "A Rape on Campus" by Sabrina Rubin Erdely, which described a brutal gang rape of a woman named Jackie at a University of Virginia fraternity house; the university's failure to respond to this alleged assault – and the school's troubling history of indifference to many other instances of alleged sexual assaults. The story generated worldwide headlines and much soul-searching at UVA. University president Teresa Sullivan promised a full investigation and also to examine the way the school responds to sexual assault allegations.

Because of the sensitive nature of Jackie's story, we decided to honor her request not to contact the man she claimed orchestrated the attack on her nor any of the men she claimed participated in the attack for fear of retaliation against her. In the months Erdely spent reporting the story, Jackie neither said nor did anything that made Erdely, or Rolling Stone's editors and fact-checkers, question Jackie's credibility. Her friends and rape activists on campus strongly supported Jackie's account. She had spoken of the assault in campus forums. We reached out to both the local branch and the national leadership of the fraternity where Jackie said she was attacked. They responded that they couldn't confirm or deny her story but had concerns about the evidence.

In the face of new information, there now appear to be discrepancies in Jackie's account, and we have come to the conclusion that our trust in her was misplaced. We were trying to be sensitive to the unfair shame and humiliation many women feel after a sexual assault and now regret the decision to not contact the alleged assaulters to get their account. We are taking this seriously and apologize to anyone who was affected by the story.

Will Dana
Managing Editor

http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/a-note-to-our-readers-20141205
maxdancona
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 02:00 pm
@oralloy,
Wow! This moral of this story is people's willingness to swallow the most unlikely story, without question, as long as it matches their biases. The "Rape Culture" narrative, in this case, obscured the truth and caused real damage. The University administration was slandered in this story, as was the fraternity (which was shut down and vandalized).

I hope there is a lawsuit.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 02:55 pm
@maxdancona,
Quote:
this story is people's willingness to swallow the most unlikely story, without question


Unlikely story such as a fairly large group of college males was all willing to gang rape some woman.

Not one not two but four or five rapists at one party but after all almost all straight males would rape if they thought they could get away with it at least in the opinion of the feminists.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 03:29 pm
@BillRM,
Oh it was seven college men repeat seven college men who turn out to be rapist in this story........

No reason to question one woman word that seven college men just decided to rape her one night as after all men are...................
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  0  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 03:37 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
Unlikely story such as a fairly large group of college males was all willing to gang rape some woman.

Unfortunately, it's not an unlikely story. Gang rapes are occurring on campuses. Just within the past few weeks, 2 gang rapes have been reported at colleges in New Jersey, and arrests have been made in both cases.

One was at Ramapo College..
Quote:

Three more charged in Ramapo College sex assault
November 24, 2014,

The scope of an investigation into an alleged sexual assault at the Ramapo College campus in Mahwah broadened Monday as three students, including an 18-year-old woman, were accused of encouraging the reported attack, and authorities said a second victim was sexually abused.

The announcement of additional charges prompted the college president, Peter P. Mercer, to issue a statement saying the new charges raised a “fundamental issue” about “personal responsibility and respect for one’s fellow students” that he said were “at the core of collegiate life.” He also said the college planned to have an outside group conduct an independent review of some of its policies and educational programs, and that he planned to conduct a campuswide discussion in light of the charges.

Bergen County Prosecutor John L. Molinelli issued a news release on Monday afternoon announcing that three students had been charged with endangering an injured victim, adding that they “aided or encouraged” two other students during an alleged assault in a dorm room following a fraternity party that took place the evening of Nov. 14. Additional charges have been filed against the two students who were arrested last week on the sexual assault charges, he said.

Jordyn Massood, an 18-year-old woman from Wayne, and two 18-year-old men from Staten Island, Justin Sommers and Christopher Rainone, were arrested on the campus “without incident” on endangerment charges, Molinelli said. Sommers and Rainone also were charged with invasion of privacy for allegedly taking photos of the victim without her consent, Molinelli said. The three students were released after being issued summonses. None could be reached for comment Monday night.

Nakeem D. Gardner, 18, of Paterson, and Christian A. Lopez, 24, of Secaucus, had been charged last week with first-degree sexual assault and other offenses. Authorities filed additional charges against both men on Monday, including a criminal sexual contact charge against Lopez for allegedly “inappropriately touching” another woman.

Molinelli said that Lopez also faced new charges related to the original sexual assault: criminal restraint, endangering an injured victim and invasion of privacy. Gardner, who was charged last week with invasion of privacy for allegedly taking photos of the victim, is now additionally charged with endangering an injured victim, Molinelli said. Gardner and Lopez remain in the Bergen County Jail on $350,000 bail apiece, according to jail records.

The new charges come as students and educators engage in national discussions about rape at colleges, and growing concerns have been expressed about campus culture, with allegations that sexual assaults and other sexually abusive behavior often go unreported. Just three days ago, the University of Virginia responded to a report of an alleged gang rape at a fraternity by temporarily shutting down all fraternities.

Mercer, Ramapo’s president, said in a message to students posted on his Web page that alcohol consumption appears to have been “a factor for the accused in this case” and added that he plans to intensify educational efforts that focus on the dangers of binge drinking. He also expressed disappointment about the accusations against the three newly charged students. He said their alleged offenses “have to do with invasion of privacy and failure to render aid.”

“It is distressing to think that none of those who were aware of this incident at the time appear to have intervened even by reporting it anonymously,” he wrote. “This is not who we are and does not reflect the values that we, as a college, uphold and promote..."
http://www.northjersey.com/news/three-more-charged-in-ramapo-college-sex-assault-1.1140711

Quote:

Judge reduces bail for Secaucus man charged in Ramapo College sex assault
December 2, 2014,
By PETER J. SAMPSON
The Record

Over the objections of Bergen County Assistant Prosecutor Catherine Fantuzzi, Judge John A. Conte lowered bail for Christian A. Lopez to $300,000 from $350,000 and ordered that he surrender his passport and avoid contact with the victim.

The judge cited Lopez’s strong family ties and lack of a criminal record.

Defense attorney John J. Bruno Jr. said 31 family members and friends, who packed a Hackensack courtroom, have “rallied around” Lopez to help him make bail. Otherwise, Lopez could be sitting in jail for the next two years, the lawyer said.

“We feel very confident he’s going to be exonerated of these charges,” Bruno said after the hearing. Bruno added that he is “looking forward to sharing information” with the prosecutor that “will shed a different light” on the facts of the case.

Lopez, 24, and Nakeem D. Gardner, 18, of Paterson, have been charged with first-degree aggravated sexual assault and other offenses in connection with the alleged rape of an intoxicated female student in a dorm room following a fraternity party on the night of Nov. 14.

Fantuzzi said the 19-year-old victim met Lopez at the party and became intoxicated after consuming “a number of shots.” Lopez allegedly locked her in a room. He was later seen pulling up her pants and carrying her over his back on the way to the dorm, she said.

The prosecutor said Lopez admitted to a friend that he had sex with the student and that she was passed out on a bed. When Lopez later asked Gardner if “you want a piece of that,” Gardner allegedly got into bed with the victim, whom he had never met before, Fantuzzi said.

The victim went to the hospital the following day and was found to have vaginal lacerations consistent with non-consensual sex, the prosecutor said. She added the victim had been “highly intoxicated” and was not in any position to give consent.

Three other students, including an 18-year-old woman, were later accused of encouraging the attack and endangering an injured victim.

In arguing for lower bail, Bruno said there won’t be any DNA evidence against his client and that he believes the facts will show “the victim was highly sober.”

“I understand that the video statement to law enforcement is compelling and very disturbing. However, I believe that there is different version that must be as thoroughly investigated as her version,” Bruno said after the hearing.

“My client’s life has been turned upside down as has his entire family’s,” Bruno said.

He said he believes he can provide proof to the prosecutor that the woman was not intoxicated.
http://www.northjersey.com/news/judge-reduces-bail-for-secaucus-man-charged-in-ramapo-college-sex-assault-1.1144923


The other case, at William Patterson University involved 5 men..
Quote:
New details in William Paterson gang rape allegations: Men blocked door during violent attack
By James Kleimann
NJ Advance Media for NJ.com
December 01, 2014

WAYNE — The men accused of sexually assaulting a William Paterson University student blocked the residence hall doorway, restrained the victim, and demanded that she have sex with all five of them, according to criminal complaints filed against the students on Saturday.

The criminal complaints, though brief, detail an alleged violent sexual attack involving the five men–all William Paterson students–and the female student in the dorm room Tuesday night.

The criminal complaints allege freshman students Noah Williams, Termaine Scott, Darius Singleton and Garrett Collick, all 18, conspired to sexually assault the victim.

Before the attack began, Collick allegedly said that if the victim "wanted to have sex with him she would have to have sex with all of them," the complaint says. He then made the statement, "Well, let's have sex," according to the complaint.

The lights and television at the dorm room in Overlook South were shut off and someone blocked the door, according to the court documents.

At some point during the assault, Jahmel Latimer, an 18-year-old student from Hoboken, allegedly walked into the room asking what was going on, according to one complaint. When another defendant replied that they were having sex with the victim, Latimer said, "Oh word, can I jump on that?" according to the complaint. Latimer then allegedly forced the victim to perform oral sex before penetrating her, the complaint says.

A university police detective filed for probable cause warrants on Friday. The defendants were subsequently arrested the following day. All are being held on $200,000 bail.

The complaints do not make clear a timeline of the alleged events, nor do they detail how the victim knew her alleged attackers.

Latimer is charged with multiple counts of aggravated sexual assault. Collick, a Paterson resident, is charged with conspiracy to commit sexual assault, criminal restraint, multiple counts of aggravated sexual assault and aggravated sexual contact. Williams, of Camden, is charged with conspiracy to commit sexual assault, criminal restraint, aggravated sexual assault. Tremaine Scott, of Vineland, is charged with conspiracy to commit sexual assault, two counts of criminal restraint and attempt to commit sexual assault.

The final defendant, Singleton, of Jersey City, is charged with conspiracy to commit sexual assault, criminal restraint, aggravated sexual assault and aggravated criminal sexual contact.

University officials refused to answer questions related to the case, referring all queries to the Passaic County Prosecutor's office. The prosecutor's office did not return requests for comment.

In a statement issued Sunday night, university president Kathleen Waldron said she was "angry and dismayed that this crime was committed on our campus and allegedly by students," adding that she had "deep concern" for the "courageous victim."

"No expression of anger or sadness on my part can alleviate the harm done to the victim and my heart goes out to her and her family," Waldron said. "I offer the full support of the University community."

Joanna Maziarz, of Queens, N.Y., lives in Overlook South, the freshman dormitory where the alleged sexual assault is said to have taken place on Tuesday. With an impending snowstorm on Wednesday and Thanksgiving falling on Thursday, there were few people on the campus, she said. And most people commute to class anyway.

"There wasn't anybody here," she said. "It was kind of like a ghost town."

The defendants are scheduled to make their first appearance in Passaic County Superior Court at 10:30 a.m.Tuesday.
http://www.nj.com/passaic-county/index.ssf/2014/12/william_paterson_students_gang-raped_student_criminal_complaint_claims.html


Trying to deny the reality of what's occurring on campuses won't change the fact that rapes, and gang rapes, are continuing to take place. Maybe you need to acknowledge what some men on campuses--like the 5 at William Patterson University are actually doing to women.

0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 03:44 pm
@BillRM,
No reason at all to not give the below nonsense full credit at least if you are a man hating person such as Firefly.

footnote we are now up to eight rapists.


Quote:


http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2014/12/sabrina_rubin_erdely_uva_why_didn_t_a_rolling_stone_writer_talk_to_the_alleged.2.html

Various writers and media outlets have now started to pick apart Erdely’s reporting, as well as the details of Jackie’s story as reported by Rolling Stone. That’s because, even by the standards of horrific, despicable frat behavior, this story stands out. Jackie, who says she was sober, was allegedly led upstairs by her date into a dark room, where seven men allegedly raped her as others egged them on. She tells Erdely that she was smashed into a glass coffee table and raped by a beer bottle. Drew, who had invited her to the frat party as his date, allegedly stood by and orchestrated the whole thing. When he later ran into Jackie, she says that he told her he’d had a “great time.” That’s not expected behavior even by the standards of rapists. That’s psychotic.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 03:48 pm
@BillRM,
Do you also feel that the very recent arrests of 5 men at William Patterson University, for a gang rape, is "nonsense"?

Trying to deny the reality of what's occurring on campuses won't change the fact that rapes, and gang rapes, are continuing to take place. Maybe you need to acknowledge what some men on campuses--like the 5 at William Patterson University are actually doing to women...

maxdancona
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 04:22 pm
@firefly,
You are really missing the point. I don´t think anyone, even BillRM, is saying that there aren´t gang rapes. Certainly no one is saying that rapes shouldn´t be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

The important discussion is over policy, specifically what policy is appropriate to address and prevent rape.

I think everyone agrees on these facts.

- Rape is a serious crime that merits a serious response.
- Rape does happen on college campuses and in society in general, and when it does it is tragic and detestable.

We disagree about the prevalence of rape on campuses and in society in general. This is a factual question. It is a reasonable one to ask, many social scientists agree that the 1 in 5 figure is not mathematically valid. Someone shouldn´t be pilloried for raising this factual question.

And there are also legitimate questions in what policies are effective.

Raising questions about facts or about policies is not the same as supporting rape.

It would be nice to be able to have a reasonable, fact-based discussion on this without ideologically laden accusations and anecdotes hurled who dares question the narrative.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 04:40 pm
@maxdancona,
Quote:
You are really missing the point. I don´t think anyone, even BillRM, is saying that there aren´t gang rapes. Certainly no one is saying that rapes shouldn´t be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.


Of course there are gang rapes it just beyond any likelihood that eight male students would take part in a college rape at least it so unlikely that to not question such a story in details when someone making such a claim is truly amazing.

How many rapists does our friend Firefly think is running around any given university campus that eight of them would have likely gotten together to gang
rape some woman?

By the way if eight men have violently rape a woman she should had ended up either in an ICU or in the morgue.
bobsal u1553115
 
  0  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 04:49 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:

rape some woman?

By the way if eight men have violently rape a woman she should had ended up either in an ICU or in the morgue.


You know that how?
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 05:13 pm
@maxdancona,
Quote:
You are really missing the point. I don´t think anyone, even BillRM, is saying that there aren´t gang rapes.

Then you're not reading BillRM very carefully. He finds it "unlikely" that there would be 4 or 5 rapists in one group--yet that is apparently the situation that actually occurred last week with the gang rape at William Patterson University that involved 5 men.

This is what BillRM said...
Quote:
Unlikely story such as a fairly large group of college males was all willing to gang rape some woman.

Not one not two but four or five rapists at one party but after all almost all straight males would rape if they thought they could get away with it at least in the opinion of the feminists.

He's additionally implying such gang rape crimes don't occur on campuses--that they are some fantasy of "feminists". The problem is, that's an attempt to minimize or deny quite real criminal behavior on our campuses that has nothing to do with "feminists", who, as a group, definitely do not promote the view that all men are potential rapists.
Quote:
It would be nice to be able to have a reasonable, fact-based discussion on this without ideologically laden accusations and anecdotes hurled who dares question the narrative.

But BillRM can't do that. If I am concerned about crimes of rape that largely go unreported, or unpunished, or inadequately punished, and I confront him with actual news reports of rapes on campuses, he responds by calling me "man-hating". Is that your idea of a "reasonable discussion"?
Quote:
The important discussion is over policy, specifically what policy is appropriate to address and prevent rape

I think colleges are already putting into place good educational programs, and bystander intervention programs, to address those issues. They are also trying to address the binge drinking that's often a contributory factor.
Quote:
Rape is a serious crime that merits a serious response.

We already have a policy for dealing with rape--it's a felony crime. That's why it should be handled by the police and criminal justice system, not by college tribunals. And the focus should be on improving the way law enforcement handles these matters, and responds to victims, so more of them are willing to report their assaults directly to the police.

If rape can be committed with impunity, because fear of consequences or punishment is non existent or minimal, it won't be deterred. However, if these complaints carry the threat of an arrest, criminal prosecution, and years of jail time, that might dramatically change.

0 Replies
 
wmwcjr
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 05:46 pm
@maxdancona,
Are you aware that hawkeye10 and BillRM have mocked actual rape victims who are members of this forum? Yet not a peep from you! This is the moral equivalent of saying that David Duke represents a legitimate point of view and, as such, should be included in a debate on affirmative action. If you defend lowlife, that makes you lowlife!
BillRM
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 06:00 pm
@wmwcjr,
Quote:
This is the moral equivalent of saying that David Duke represents a legitimate point of view


Yes indeed, if you can not support your positions with facts or logic go for an Ad Hominem attack.

Sorry but facts are facts and logic is logic and have nothing at all to do with who might bring it forward even if it might be David Duke or even worst Firefly for that matter...... Rolling Eyes

Quote:


http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ad+hominem

ad hominem
[ad hom-uh-nuh m -nem, ahd‐]
Word Origin
adjective
1.
appealing to one's prejudices, emotions, or special interests rather than to one's intellect or reason.
2.
attacking an opponent's character rather than answering his argument.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 06:14 pm
@wmwcjr,
wmwcjr wrote:

Are you aware that hawkeye10 and BillRM have mocked actual rape victims who are members of this forum? Yet not a peep from you! This is the moral equivalent of saying that David Duke represents a legitimate point of view and, as such, should be included in a debate on affirmative action. If you defend lowlife, that makes you lowlife!


As I recall this is only because of lack of agreement on what rape and sexual assault is. "I think I was raped so you need to treat me like I was raped" does not work for me, because my opinion counts as much as does the opinion of the person who wears the victim label.

That is any mocking that took place over something called rape or sexual assault. It is entirely possible that I have mocked a victim over some other issue, being a victim most certainly does not mean that your **** does not stink.

I think examples are in order so that we might know what you are talking about.
hawkeye10
 
  3  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 06:18 pm
@wmwcjr,
Quote:
This is the moral equivalent of saying that David Duke represents a legitimate point of view

If David Duke fills out a customer comment card at my restaurant I will give it the same consideration as anyone elses. Why won't I? He is a human right? He is a citizen of the UNited States right? You are telling me that since you and a lot of people dont agree with some of his opinions that none of his opinions should count. That is wrong, and you should be ashamed of yourself.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 06:31 pm
@hawkeye10,
My sin Hawkeye as far as I know revolved around this lady who told us all how she had been a rape victim any numbers of times covering most of her lifespan.

Never challenge those claims and as a matter of fact took them all at face value but when she posted a story of how a husband would beat his wife up for not reaching orgasm I stated that I did not buy into that story given that all the woman would had needed to do is fake reaching orgasms to avoid beatings.

Turn out this was another claims of hers and not a story dealing with someone else and rope was gather to hang me.

Take note however my question have nothing to do with rape but domestic violence in anycase.
hawkeye10
 
  3  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 07:13 pm
@BillRM,
The only thing I remember about my alleged crimes is Osso claiming that since she was raped she should not have to listen to my offensive views on sexual assault policy, to which I replied that my views had nothing to do with her and that I have as much right to own and to voice an opinion on sexual assault policy as does anyone else. Furthermore that if my views are too much for her she certainly knows where the exit is and she should probably use it.
hawkeye10
 
  3  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 07:25 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
Rolling Stone issued a statement today saying it can no longer stand by its story about a brutal gang rape of a young woman named Jackie at a University of Virginia fraternity party. “In the face of new information, there now appear to be discrepancies in Jackie's account, and we have come to the conclusion that our trust in her was misplaced.” The magazine did not elaborate on the new information but the Washington Post, which has essentially been re-reporting the story since it broke last month, and representatives for the Virginia chapter of the fraternity, Phi Kappa Psi, started providing the details.

According to Phi Kappa Psi lawyer Ben Warthen, the frat apparently did not host a party on the night of Sept. 28, 2012, which is when Jackie said she was lured upstairs by her date, “Drew,” and gang raped by seven men. Jackie had said she met Drew because they were lifeguards together, but no member of the fraternity was employed by the university’s Aquatic Fitness Center during that time frame. Also, the Rolling Stone story implied that the rape was some kind of an initiation ritual, but pledging takes place during the spring semester, not the fall.

Up until now, Jackie had been reluctant to reveal the name of the man who took her on the date. But this week, according to the Post, she told it to some of her friends—activists who had supported her since the alleged rape. The man whose name she gave belonged to a different fraternity, not Phi Kappa Psi

http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2014/12/rolling_stone_backs_away_from_its_uva_gang_rape_story.html

SHOCKING
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HOW COME . . . - Question by Setanta
Men who defend feminism? - Question by whatthefudge
Teach Men Not To Rape? - Question by nononono
Does every woman have her price...? - Question by nononono
Men Are Bad, Baaaaaaaaaaad. - Question by nononono
Misogyny - Discussion by chai2
Elliot Rodger - Question by FOUND SOUL
Best Looking Team at the Olympics? - Discussion by hawkeye10
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 04/29/2024 at 12:11:05