@bobsal u1553115,
bobsal u1553115 wrote:
Seriously. You think men are raped in anywhere the numbers women are??? There are figure and research that show that men are raped in significantly fewer numbers.
Have you looked up figures for this?
I think its just an attempt to turn the discussion away from an uncomfortable truth for some of you guys.
Errr... I was precisely
trying to find data and just posted a Huffington Post article which provided some if the figures you ask for... Did you read it before calling it a diversion?
The quote I copy-pasted gives a low estimate of
one in 25 [college students who][/i]answered "yes" to the question "In your lifetime have you been forced to submit to sexual intercourse against your will?"[/i]; and a high estimate of one in six among 18 year old American males being victims of some form of sexual assault. Most likely, this 1 in 6 estimate is either a gross exaggeration or based on a wide variety of "assaults", not all of which I'd make a big fuss about. It all depends on what you include in the definition.
I'll try and find better estimates by looking for comparative studies. To me it's also a question of good research methodology. If a group of studies focus on female victims only, and another set of studies look at male victims only, the data may not be comparable across studies and genders, due to methodological differences (different samples and questionnaires used in different surveys). So to me mind, good gender-related research must collect and compare data for both genders using the same methodology. This has the further advantage of providing a check against gender biases within research agendas, teams and tools, which cannot be excluded but could be reduced that way...
Quote:I am sorry you were assaulted. Its no joke. Do you mind my asking if your assailant was male?
I am not sorry at all. We were both drunk, 18, partying like mad in an isolated Brittany farmhouse rented for the weekend. **** is bound to happen when you mix too much hormones, Calvados, New Wave music and granitic landscapes...
That's precisely why we were there, of course, for some of this awkward sexual stuff to happen between us.
At some point of the night I was laying on the grass outside, recuperating shall we say, and this very good friend of mine, larger than I was by some noticeable measure (one reason for which I was not sexually attracted by her), laid next to me and quite soon over me, as she made clear even to my very dull self at that moment how much she loved me, by way of much kisses, rushed caresses, and what sounded like beautiful but hesitant words (she was a literature geek). It took me some time to extract myself from under her mass in a way that would not be too rude... She was a friend and i didn't want to hurt her any more than necessary. At the same time I was starting to feel seriously claustrophobic down there. So i got on my feet somehow, muttered some excuse and rushed back into the party and that was the end of that.
So, is that a "rape" or a "sexual assault"? Not in my book: we were both drunk, and maybe she pretended to be more drunk than she was but who cares? No harm was done to my glory hole or anything like that... Was just an awkward moment. We remained friends after that, of course.
Not sure I understand the relevance of this line of questioning, however... Do you usually ask A2K members who post about rape if they have been raped personally? I find that rude and unnecessary. People who have not been raped are nevertheless to speak about it, no?
And what difference would it make exactly, if my "assailant" had been male???? Was that just curiosity or were you going to make some kind of point about it?