@giujohn,
Yet another mature, insightful and academic post from giujohn. Ho-hum. Your attempts to post data have failed so far because you don't seem to know what it means for data to have credibility. A relevant expert saying that a report is "astronomically inaccurate" is no less credible because he's being interviewed by a comedian than if he were testifying before the SCOTUS. And attacking the source is a freshman-level
ad hom, anyway. Not that, given the quality of your posts to date, I would expect anything better.