@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
I don't accept your ipse dixit statement. The purpose of studying history is to better understand human nature. You can keep your Marxist dialectic to yourself. You are the one who keeps shifting the emphasis here. You tried to claim that the Americans attacked christianity in order to lower the morale of the British. That's bullsh*t. It's also bullshit that i defended christianity. Pointing out how very wrong you were is not a defense of christianity. It's just keeping the record straight.
This truculent message of yours, short as it is, sets up two strawmen:
(1) A fictitious Marxist (when I believe that the central ideas <or the conclusion> of Marx expressed in the Communist Manifesto are bullshit, you call me a Marxist?).
(2) Distorting my original message.
What I've said is:
oristarA wrote:
No wonder Thomas Jefferson said:"Christianity is the most perverted system that ever shone on man."
The success of American Independence demanded some degree of anti-Christianity to undermine the morale of the then Great Britain.
Think of this:
Great Britain was built on Christianity, while the United States was in majority Christian. Now the two countries were at war, at a life-and-death fighting. Was there a great possibility of the existence of anti-Christianity?
Facts speak louder than words. It is probable that Christianity contains the seeds of self-destruction. Or in another word, it contains the seeds of anti-Christianity.
To euphemize the jarring voice "anti-Christianity", it was the time to launch a campaign - the Enlightenment. Because evidence-based science and faith-based religion are such alien categories that they must be "anti" each other.