@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:
Again, Contrex acted scholarly and to be himself. This wise man's calm explanation cogently anatomised an extemporaneous remark, which was actually well-thought-out and entered into his subconscious. That is why he would speak it out in an off-the-cuff manner. He's not joking here, because both (the situations in US and UK) are serious realities.
Once the meaning is clarified, let's turn to Izzy, who's one of the central figures in the debate, who's backed by so many people here and whose enthusiasm in defending Christianity is apparent and vehement (unlike Setanta, the weak atheist, in order to guard Christianity, attacked me under the camouflage of atheism by concentrating his fire on denouncing Jefferson).
As soon as the questions about Izzy are cleared, we'll be able to discuss further. For example, to explain Contrex's question "how to explain the intervening massive peak in religiosity during the Victorian era and later?"
First, let us ask Izzy this question:
Are you for or against Christianity?
Based on the impression we all share, the answer seems no doubt to be a strong "for". Is it so, Izzy? Now allow me venture further to point out that Izzy is a Christian (or a strong supporter of Christianity). Yes, Izzy?
It could have well explained Izzy's passion in the discussion: A firm denial of the decline of Christianity in Great Britain.
Next, let us ask Izzy another question:
Has your passion really helped defend Christianity?
I believe Izzy's intuition would immediately urge him to answer a loud "Yes". But in his deep heart, he hesitates.
Why hesitate?
Today, the majority of American people are Christian. This means Christianity has won a great victory in spreading its Gospel in the United States. Any Christian should be proud of the triumph of the religion. Yet Izzy failed to get this (and insisted it was joking):
izzythepush wrote:
Ori wrote: Contrex sincerely pointed out that while most of Americans believe Christianity, there is no state religion in America. Can you feel the sincerity of his judgment?
No, I honestly can't.
That is, Izzy did not go to help defend Christianity; rather, he actually derided it and destroyed it. That is why he hesitates.
It is not because Izzy is so retarded, but because his mental inertia has led him astray: If Ori said something that was wrong in his ears, anything Ori says will be wrong in his mind. In other words, Izzy does not focus on the facts or the ideas; he focuses on the person and acts ad hominem.
That is why seeking truth is important. That is why I said Contrex is a wise man. Because he speaks truth. The truth that majority of Americans believe Christianity is the grand victory of the religion itself, and it has greatly helped defend Christianity.
Izzy should remember: False positive wastes time, while false negative is probably life-threatening. To admit the actual decline of Christianity in Great Britain is not a fault. Rather, it will awaken sincere Christians work harder to improve their religious work there.
I do not agree with you, but I will defend your right in Freedom of Religion.