Benghazi, Putin. How's Obama doing?

@Finn dAbuzz,

Finn: But you're right to the extent that I have no desire to learn the crap that you are teaching.
------------

Such a lame meme. I'm surprised you'd go for such a common, fallacious one. It is not me, Finn, it's the historical record.

1 Reply

@JTT,

Boring

1 Reply

@JTT,

Boring

0 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

I never thought I would see the day where you fled like a child, Finn. How come you can address Thomas, setanta (spell check brought up 'sewer ants' Smile

) and others but you can't address the issues I've many times placed in front of you.

Now you steal a lame meme from CI without a footnote. Have you no shame?

1 Reply

@parados,

Quote:

Can you be specific rather then your usual claim without evidence?

I supply a source almost every time I post. Why lie to people? I guess I keep forgetting it is your job.

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

The Pink Prevaricator wrote:

I supply a source almost every time I post. Why lie to people? I guess I keep forgetting it is your job.

The previous 13 posts to this one on the previous 2 pages included no sources. What does "almost every time" mean to you?

1 Reply

@parados,

Did those posts need sources? A silly question to ask you. It seems a lot lately are informing you that your opinions and narrative do not impress me and never will.

2 Replies

@coldjoint,

Clearly caught out on your lying nature and what do you do but go to more lies, cj.

0 Replies

@JTT,

Way too boring.

1 Reply

@Finn dAbuzz,

Way too lame, Finn. You're embarrassing yourself.

2 Replies

@JTT,

I, obviously, think not.

Here's the deal, I'm more than happy to engage in debate with posters who are not operating as a bot for Noam Chomsky or Howard Zinn.

Flooding a thread with the rants or links to rants by Chomsky, Zinn et al is not something that engenders a responsive interest in me. Neither is your own personal, similar screed.

You don't present opinions which are subject to discussion, you present declarations for which you will brook no disagreement. Why would anyone want to engage you in discussion? Unless they respond something to the effect of "JTT you are absolutely right!," they will suffer an onslaught of your insult.

Why is it that you can't endure even the slightest possibility that you might be wrong?

Many in this forum have tried to engage you is discussion only to be met with the pat response of "You cowardly liar!"

Each and every other member of this forum are more interesting to engage with, because there is never a sense, as with you, that one is attempting to respond to a person shouting at the top of their lungs.

Dial back your outrage a whole lot and maybe I and others will be quite happy to debate you.

1 Reply

@Finn dAbuzz,

You nailed it.

0 Replies

@JTT,

By the way, I really have tried (whether or not you agree) to maintain a connection with you, but if we are going to be polluting threads with these redundant comments, I have to stop.

I hope we can enjoy a discussion that extends beyond you telling me I am an embarrassing liar, but I'm just not going to subject other members to these pointless exchanges.

It's up to you. Unfortunately I have absolutely no hope that you will change your approach and every expectation that this post will invoke an insult from you.

Eventually, everyone in this forum (cowards or not) will be ignoring you, and your comments, to the extent that anyone sees them, will be little more than the bellowing of a homeless lunatic crowing to the world that he must be heard.

I hope you can learn to control your vehemence, but it may take years of maturation.

0 Replies

@coldjoint,

The Pink Prevaricator wrote:

I supply a source almost every time I post.

The Pink Prevaricator wrote:

Did those posts need sources? A silly question to ask you. It seems a lot lately are informing you that your opinions and narrative do not impress me and never will.

I see you have decided to make excuses rather than admit your statement was factually incorrect. Clearly you don't supply a source almost every time you post. In reality, you rarely supply a source when you post because most of what you post is meaningless drivel.

1 Reply

@parados,

Quote:

you post is meaningless drivel.

No. I told you I was not a liberal. And the garbage you are peddling with a chart that shows the GDP in 2019? What kind of bullshit is that? Talk about meaningless. Try again shill.

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

The Pink Prevaricator wrote:

Quote:
you post is meaningless drivel.

No. I told you I was not a liberal. And the garbage you are peddling with a chart that shows the GDP in 2019? What kind of bullshit is that? Talk about meaningless. Try again shill.

So you think there is no future problem with SS or Medicare since we can't project future numbers? Or do you only want to accept numbers that support your outlandish world view?

1 Reply

@parados,

Quote:

your outlandish world view?

Then are numbers that support a different view than yours? And what is outlandish? The fact that I don't like entitlements and group rights over individual ones for the common good that only one party sees? And has done everything and anything to shove it down Americas throat.

From controlling the media to insulting citizens by calling them liars, and today saying they were too stupid to use the internet. People are getting tired of the **** sandwich you offer without the bread. And the fact that they(taxpayers) are paying for the bread just to see everyone but them eat it.

We do not need special exceptions. We need rule of law and enforcement of the principles in the Constitution. And none of that involves creating a unsustainable nanny state. Where people are silenced by arrogant elites. That what you are pushing and you know it. You could care less about freedom of choice and actions based on your God given rights not what someone tells you those rights are.

1 Reply

@coldjoint,

coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
your outlandish world view?

Then are numbers that support a different view than yours? And what is outlandish? The fact that I don't like entitlements and group rights over individual ones for the common good that only one party sees? And has done everything and anything to shove it down Americas throat.

Your first sentence makes no sense. Could you rewrite it so it does?

If you don't like entitlements then why are you taking advantage of so many? Do you drive? That is an entitlement. Do you drink water from a faucet? Since you only believe in your own individual rights why are you on the internet which was created by government spending for the common good? You spew **** then stand around in it and pretend you are covered in chocolate. You don't seem to understand the simple things about life in the USA.

1 Reply

@parados,

Quote:

Your first sentence makes no sense.

Then there are numbers....

Quote:

Do you drive? That is an entitlement. Do you drink water from a faucet?

Driving is a privilege. Not an entitlement. I pay my water bill, that is not an entitlement either. People who don't pay and receive that service are receiving entitlements. That is the difference.

And about the internet, am I hearing the "you didn't build that"line? That is another bill I pay. If you think life is about not paying bills and depending on the government that depends on working Americans to pay them, you are wrong.

2 Replies

@coldjoint,

The Pink Prevaricator wrote:

Driving is a privilege. Not an entitlement. I pay my water bill, that is not an entitlement either. People who don't pay and receive that service are receiving entitlements. That is the difference.

I see. So an entitlement is something YOU didn't pay for. OK. When does one pay for it?

If someone pays into SS for 4o years, they are NOT paying in when they receive benefits, so is that an entitlement or not when they get benefits?
If someone collects unemployment is that an entitlement? They clearly aren't paying anything for the benefit when they receive it.

0 Replies

Benghazi, Putin. How's Obama doing?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know