24
   

Congratulations, House Republicans!

 
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 05:56 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
I thumb coldtwerp down when he confuses his personal uninformed opinion with fact or evidence.


No I don't. What my opinion is based on is what I read and I contend my sources are just as honest and factual as yours. I know that isn't saying much.

And when you are confronted with facts you do not like you yell racist. Your approval or opinion of me is a non-issue with me. But you are a narrow minded nitwit.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 05:57 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:


Quote:
Are you trying to justify something you are doing by citing others who do it?????


Now you are getting it.


I wish you would! Wink
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 06:07 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
I wish you would! Wink


The fact that I do get it, is what bothers so many of you.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 06:32 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
I wish you would! Wink


The fact that I do get it, is what bothers so many of you.


One...I don't think you DO get it!

Two...whether you do or don't does not bother me.

Three...the person who seems most "bothered" in this thread...IS YOU, CJ.

You seem constantly to be bemoaning what "they" are doing to you...and what "they" think about you.

Calm down. This is an Internet forum where people of different perspectives meet to discuss these perspectives. And at times...to see if they can rattle opponents.

You seem to rattle way too easily.

Take my advice...calm down. Stop complaining. Accept that others disagree with you...and in this particular forum...a vast majority disagree with you.

And have fun.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 07:06 pm
BAM!- Another Republican Goes Down as Rick Perry Is The FOCUS Of A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION

http://mx2.politicususa.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/perry-surprise-485x322.jpg

Texas Gov. Rick Perry has lawyered up as the criminal investigation into whether he illegally withheld money from a district attorney’s office is gaining steam.


According to the American-Statesman:

Gov. Rick Perry has retained a high-profile Austin defense lawyer to represent him in a criminal investigation into whether he illegally withheld money from the Travis County district attorney’s office, the American-Statesman and KVUE-TV confirmed Sunday.

The hiring of David L. Botsford is the latest signal that the inquiry into Perry’s conduct might be gaining momentum after a seven-month investigation.


http://www.statesman.com/news/news/state-regional-govt-politics/rick-perry-hires-austin-lawyer-for-criminal-inquir/nfY8w/



If this case reminds you of another Republican governor who wants to run for president, but is trapped in his own web of self created scandals, it should. Perry got himself into hot water by threating to withhold $7.5 million in funding unless the Democratic Travis County DA resigned. Perry wanted her to resign after she was convicted of a DWI. The Democrat promised not to run for reelection, but refused to resign. Perry’s actions put a cloud of uncertainty over hundreds of criminal investigations and were illegal. The governor can’t withhold funding in order to pressure another elected official to resign. The matter of the DA and her DWI is an issue between her and the voters.



Gov. Perry’s actions are very similar to what Chris Christie is being accused of doing in New Jersey. Christie is accused of withholding Sandy aid, unless political favors were granted to his campaign donors. Both Christie and Perry have White House dreams in 2016, and both may be undone by their own criminal abuses of power.



http://www.politicususa.com/2014/04/14/republican-rick-perry-focus-criminal-investigation.html
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 07:10 pm
I wonder who the Teapublican is?

Key witness in Robaina’s tax-evasion trial testifies paying former Hialeah mayor in cash
Source: Miami Herald

Posted on Monday, 04.14.14
Key witness in Robaina’s tax-evasion trial testifies paying former Hialeah mayor in cash
By Jay Weaver
[email protected]


A key witness in the tax-evasion trial of Julio Robaina blew a big hole in the former Hialeah mayor’s defense Monday, when he testified that the politician regularly picked up cash payments from him or his father on high-interest loans that Robaina made to a jewelry investor.

Roberto Blanco testified that Robaina came to his father’s Hialeah home to collect the cash stuffed in envelopes as payments on loans to Luis Felipe Perez, who would later be convicted of running a Ponzi scheme.

Asked by a prosecutor who gave the cash payments to the then-Hialeah mayor, Blanco testified under oath: “Myself or my father. ... I would call him or text him and tell him to come and pick it up.”

Blanco also testified that he “never discussed” the loans to Perez with Robaina’s wife, Raiza, who is also standing trial on tax-evasion charges.

Blanco, testifying for the prosecution, received immunity from the U.S. attorney’s office.


Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/04/14/4059475/key-witness-in-robainas-tax-evasion.html
0 Replies
 
wmwcjr
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 08:05 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
This is interesting. I think I'll respond. . . . Smile

Quote:
I thumb coldtwerp down when he confuses his personal uninformed opinion with fact or evidence. So you can imagine how often that it. If there is some concern or interest in who it was, you have my permission to assume its me because it probably is. If you get a thumbs down don't necessarily assume its me. But don't assume its not. Go ahead, ask, I'll let you know. That's me. I do believe in anonymous ballot and I don't care if you've voted me down or not.


I get the impression there's a slight animosity between you and cj. Laughing But I wonder if both of you guys don't enjoy it. Smile

I did not have you in mind at all when I expressed my frustration with the "thumbing down" feature. There is no reason why I would want to thumb you down. I will admit there are a few members here whom I actually dislike with much enthusiasm, individuals to whom I wouldn't give the time of day if I ever met them in real life because they have manifested cruelty to an amazing degree; but you're not one of them. You're a relatively new member; so, I haven't had much of an opportunity to observe your online behavior. Somehow I get the impression that in real life you're fun to be around. Being combative in political threads is natural.

I had not thought of anonymous thumbing being similar to anonymous ballot. Interesting . . .

Quote:
Maybe the reason thumbing is anonymous so some of us don't start hijacking the discussion from House Republicans to "why did you thumb me down, boo hoo hoooo?", sorda like the one that whines, "it was you wasn't it?" that curdfont has started. If it don't mean nuthin, what's all the mopery about, then?


Good point! Here at A2K hijacking is common enough as it is! Perhaps I'm too thin-skinned for Internet forum exchanges. Would you believe some people deliberately avoid website forums because of all the fighting that goes on? I have a sister who worked as a journalist for several decades and is well-informed about politics. Her political views are the same as those of the majority of the A2K members. I recommended she become a member of A2K, but she refused because she didn't like all the fighting.

As for me, I went through my boyhood and adolescence not standing up for myself; in other words, just tried to ignore the bullies and other jerks. I didn't stand up to them because they were all physically stronger than I was and I had no self-confidence, to begin with. For the last five years, I've worked out at a health club pumping iron; and today I'm considerably more aggressive and will stand up for myself. So, when someone takes pot shots at me anonymously, I get frustrated because I feel like I'm not defending myself. There are certain individuals who tried to make my life miserable in junior high and high school. They would not be able to do that today. In fact, I'd have to resist the temptation to punch someone in the nose.

Don't mean to reveal personal stuff about myself, but it might shed some light on why I react this way.

Quote:
I expect that kind of sophistry from carpfart


Smile

Quote:
You have unpopular and unsupported opinions like cardfart does and you got to expect a certain amount of being dope slapped.

If you don't like being thumbed down, just ignore them. Pretty soon you'll be talking to only two or three people - not the reason one generally joins a forum.


Understood. Ya know, maybe I shouldn't be here. I don't feel like I really belong here. That's the price to pay for being an oddball. As a longtime A2K member once said, board messaging isn't for everyone. Besides, even though I'm retired, there's much I need to do away from the PC. I've probably overstayed my welcome, anyway. I shouldn't commit myself, but this post may be my last one. The thumber-downers would (or will) have to find someone else.

Quote:
Coopflop also is as rude as anybody else here witthe possible excetion of me and JTT. If he wants me to rein in, he ought to try it himself.


I must agree he's not a shrinking violet.

Quote:
Who are you, his mother?


Laughing Nah, I guess I'm more like his daddy. I also have this problem of automatically identifying myself with the underdog. I shouldn't do that because cj can obviously take care of himself.

Quote:
Just sayin' with all due respect, Capt'in.


I take no offense! Smile I appreciate your responding, as opposed to being * gasp * ignored. My parting words (especially with regard to your online political altercations): "Go get 'em, Tiger!" Twisted Evil




Hey, folks, I bet if bobsal and cj met in real life, they would get along just fine. I can just imagine them sitting in front of the TV watching an exciting football game and cheering the scores as they get drunk. Drunk
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 09:41 pm
@wmwcjr,
Quote:
, I bet if bobsal and cj met in real life, they would get along just fine.


Don't make that bet, and if you do, don't make it more than even money. Seriously. You and I could sit around and have a civil discussion - not a doubt in my mind. As soon as carbchunk backed one of his idiotic statements with a "its based on my reading and I know what I read (an ACTUAL clodfutz defense from this thread), I'd have to hoot him down.

I think you'd fit in all right. It took me a long while to figure this site out. Some of these folks I've been discussing with over two or thee other sites
and over ten years. But I know if I make a statement I'll be called on to defend it with some reference. Fox and Free Republic and National Review just doesn't cut it.
parados
 
  2  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 09:57 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:



At least I have standards. You just confirmed that.


By changing your standards it means you have none. You let your standards whip in the wind.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 09:57 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
Fox and Free Republic and National Review just doesn't cut it.


And the Daily Kos and MotherJoines do? The bias media that refuses to air stories critical of the administration. Like a true liberal you disregard things before you even see or hear them.

A hoot from you amounts to the almost inaudible hiss of a snake. Only the other snakes can hear it.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 10:04 pm
@parados,
Quote:
By changing your standards it means you have none. You let your standards whip in the wind.


You mean I can't do what liberals do? Why not? People listen to your bullshit.
And I think my standards should be quite clear by now. Having to keep explaining to you the narrative you employ has no affect on what I say, is getting old. I will not listen to anyone who supports this lying jerk about standards.

parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 10:08 pm
@coldjoint,
So, are you saying you are a liberal? Or are you saying you are the same as liberals? Or are you saying that some liberals like you have no standards? I can agree with that.

Your standards are quite clear by now. You could care less about non partisan standards. The only way you judge anything is through your partisan filter.

Case in point. When a President repeats what he was told by the Intelligence services, you call him a liar if he is a black Democrat. You give him a pass if he is a white Republican. That is partisan BS on your part.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 10:17 pm
@parados,
Quote:
President repeats what he was told by the Intelligence services, you call him a liar if he is a black Democrat.


Repeating what he was told is different than lying, this is what BUSH and CONGRESS believed. And not just one party. Or are you saying Obama actually thought people wouldn't lose their health plans and doctors before his famous "period". In that case you are lying.

coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 10:27 pm
Quote:
Feminists are always accusing Republicans of not caring about rape, or worse, tacitly supporting it. Someone should alert them that Harry Reid blocked Republicans’ request to vote on a bill that would process rape kits faster.


Why? I guess Harry won't let Republicans help women. What other excuse than politics to block a bill like this? Harry really could give two shits as long as they vote Democratic

http://www.rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/harry-reid-blocks-republican-request-to-pass-anti-rape-bill/
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 10:34 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Only the other snakes can hear it.


Is that why you heard it first?
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 10:36 pm
@bobsal u1553115,

Quote:
Is that why you heard it first?


The combined hissing on this forum is impossible not to hear.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 11:21 pm
CBO Estimates U.S. Deficit Will Shrink More Than Expected in 2014--Update
Source: WSJ

By Damian Paletta
WASHINGTON--The U.S. government's gap between spending and revenue will be narrower both this year and later in the decade compared with prior estimates, driven in part by reductions in near-term military spending and falling longer-run costs associated with the Affordable Care Act, the Congressional Budget Office said.

The CBO, a nonpartisan agency that advises Congress on budget policy, on Monday said the adjustments will lower its forecast for the 2014 deficit to $492 billion, or $23 billion less than it estimated two months ago. That's equivalent to 2.8% of gross domestic product, marking the smallest deficit since 2007. Since 1980, the deficit has averaged roughly 3.2% of GDP.

CBO also reduced the government's projected 10-year deficit by $286 billion, to $7.6 trillion, mainly because of lower subsidies related to the health-care law. Future Medicare spending was also revised lower.

The estimates come during a brief period of rapidly shrinking budget deficits, forcing both political parties to rethink their approaches to taxes and spending heading into the November midterm elections. The White House and Republican lawmakers have battled over the deficit for years, primarily through protracted debates over how much revenue to collect and how to structure government programs.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20140414-710455.html
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2014 11:23 pm
The seeds are being planted now to "Expand Medicaid in Texas"
State economists, doctors, hospitals, and now the very conservative, Dallas Citizens Council, are calling for Texas to expand Medicaid coverage under the Affordable Care Act.

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/columnists/steve-blow/20140412-blow-medicaid-expansion-is-just-good-business-for-texas.ece

"You know the world is topsy-turvy when the Dallas Citizens Council comes out on the liberal side of a debate.

For that matter, you know these are strange days when the Citizens Council comes out publicly for anything at all. Though not the semi-secret cabal it once was, the high-powered organization still prefers to work behind the scenes.

But there, for everyone to see, was the recent guest column in this newspaper written by Citizens Council president Alice Murray. And of all things, it called for the expansion of Medicaid in Texas.

And in the current state of Texas politics, that’s akin to subletting the Alamo.

Now, I’m sure the venerable Citizens Council would prefer that its position be categorized as something other than liberal. A common-sense position, say. Or as enlightened conservatism.
And, yes, it strikes me as both of those things.

But Texas being Texas, and Dallas being Dallas, Murray’s guest column made clear how the Citizens Council sees the controversial Medicaid expansion. And that’s as good for bidness.

“An expansion of Medicaid is beneficial for business and a positive for our state’s future,” the column concluded. “We are hopeful other business groups will join us in a united front to tackle this issue.”

Hey, whatever works. I might have started with the humane and moral arguments first.
But if good-for-business gets the job done, so be it."

A sad Texas tale: "And if it was mostly a business decision at the start, some of the mail Murray has been receiving certainly puts flesh and blood to the issue.

“I received one impassioned letter from a married mother of two. Without Medicaid expansion, she has no way to get insured. And now she has progressive multiple sclerosis. Oh, it’s such a sad story,” she said.

There is indeed a cruel twist to the current situation. The Affordable Care Act created insurance marketplaces and subsidized premiums for low-income Americans — but only for those above the poverty level."

"Yes, there is a compelling case to be made for expanding Medicaid simply as the humane thing to do.

But if dollars make more sense to you, then the Dallas Citizens Council wants you to think about the difference that an extra $10 billion to $15 billion in federal funds could make for the state.

That’s the amount we will be giving up if the Texas Legislature doesn’t expand Medicaid for 2016 and 2017. Texas has already given up nearly $8 billion by rejecting Medicaid expansion for this year and next year.

Waco economist Ray Perryman has said “it is beyond question” that Texas should participate. And now the Dallas Citizens Council says so, too."

I predict that Texas will take the Medicaid Expansion by 2016. It has no choice. Take that Ted Cruz and Rick Perry! Unfortunately, how many will die before it happens!
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 12:08 am
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
CBO Estimates U.S. Deficit Will Shrink More Than Expected in 2014-


So will the participation in the labor force. There are no jobs out there. And the part time jobs are not enough and the majority of new hires.
http://static.cdn-seekingalpha.com/uploads/2013/7/11/saupload_Full-Time-vs-Part-time-16-plus-since-2000_thumb1.png
Quote:
It is certainly possible that the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) is playing a role in employer decisions about full-time versus part-time employment. The $2,000 per employee penalty for employers who do not comply with regulations has influenced some employers to begin shifting their employment policies. Earlier this month President Obama pushed the start of the penalty from January 2014 to January 2015. But the June CPS data would have preceded that extension. Moreover, the anticipation of the penalty, even though delayed a year, will probably continue to influence the interim decisions of private employers.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/1543592-full-time-versus-part-time-employment-a-closer-look
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Apr, 2014 08:55 am
@coldjoint,
So then Obama didn't lie about Benghazi? Why did you say he did then?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 10:05:06