24
   

Congratulations, House Republicans!

 
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Apr, 2014 11:22 pm
@coldjoint,
Not the same thing asshat. Party spending is different than campaign spending.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Apr, 2014 11:24 pm
@coldjoint,
Dumb right wing blog ramblings. Dumb ******* questions.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Apr, 2014 11:26 pm
@wmwcjr,
What kind of liberal were you anyway????????????????????????
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 12 Apr, 2014 11:34 pm
Quote:
Al Sharpton’s Long Bill of Goods, From Tawana Brawley to Primetime
As a ‘Times’ documentary revives one of the many ugly incidents from the reverend’s past, it’s time NBC accounted for its decision to rehabilitate and promote him, writes Stuart Stevens.

Bad man, good questions.

Quote:
NBC has gone far beyond showing up. They have made the ethical and news judgment that Al Sharpton should be a credible news source for Americans. They have the right to make that decision, but what about the reason?

Here’s a simple test that doesn’t involve market research or complicated board meetings. If you are an NBC exec and have kids, sit down with them and watch the Times documentary on Tawana Brawley. And when your kids ask why your colleague Al Sharpton is working for NBC, you can explain to them why everything you’ve tried to teach them about honesty, fair play, and decency is wrong and Al Sharpton is right.


http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/06/03/al-sharpton-s-long-bill-of-goods-from-tawana-brawley-to-primetime.html<br />
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 12 Apr, 2014 11:39 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
Not the same thing asshat. Party spending is different than campaign spending.


What does a party spend money on besides being elected? Everything goes toward victory. In the Democrats case, fraud is one of the expenses.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Apr, 2014 11:23 am
@coldjoint,
I missed your response, cj, to my question,

Does it make you happy that your government gassed around 1000 noble animals to terrorize the Chagos islanders into leaving their homeland?
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 13 Apr, 2014 02:03 pm
@JTT,
Quote:
I missed your response, cj, to my question,


Yes, you did.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Apr, 2014 02:08 pm
@coldjoint,
Would you like me to arrange for someone to read it to you?


Does it make you happy that your government gassed around 1000 noble animals to terrorize the Chagos islanders into leaving their homeland?
wmwcjr
 
  0  
Reply Sun 13 Apr, 2014 02:20 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
bobsal u1553115 wrote:
Re: wmwcjr (Post 5634293)
What kind of liberal were you anyway????????????????????????


Oh, my . . . the cat's out of the bag! Well, let's see now. What shall I say?

My dear friend and fellow Texan Smile , your long line of question marks made me smile and chuckle -- not in derision, but in sympathy and with all due respect. You must understand. First, there is a generational factor at play here. I'm nearly 64 years old, a bit younger than you. (I mean, what happened? The years pass by so quickly!) The issues were different when I was young. (But I'm still young in spirit! Smile ) There's also the fact that I'm a Christian, which is an extremely unpopular position here at A2K.

I'm still a liberal, but with a difference: I'm a deactivated out-of-date liberal. In a sense, I haven't kept up with the times. Rest assured, I will never become a political conservative or join the Republican Party. If I ever did either of those, my close friends and loved ones would know I had "flipped my lid" and would therefore call for the men in white at the nearest psychiatric ward. I have good friends who are Republicans, but I will never join their party.

If you read certain of my posts, you would see that I'm extremely critical of political conservatism on the issue of civil rights. That is because I grew up under Jim Crow and personally saw just how terrible it was. Crying or Very sad (A certain A2k member who shall remain unidentified hates emoticons and has told me so, but I don't care. I thought they were dumb at first, but now I love the little critters!) I've been critical of conservatism on other points as well, such as the long record of the United States supporting right-wing dictators. (Not knowing JTT's age, quite possibly I was being disturbed by the policy before he/she was even born.)

I am unacceptable to today's "progressives" because I'm pro-life (except to preserve the health or to save the life of the mother). I have always been sympathetic to girls and women who have been treated badly and actually agree with feminists on many points; but because I am not "pro-choice," I'm supposedly a bad person. There was a time in this country when liberals such as Edmund Muskie, Jesse Jackson, and Edward Kennedy were pro-life. The late Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, who ran the 1972 presidential campaign of George McGovern in his state, was always pro-life to the day he died. His credentials as a liberal (except for that one issue) were impeccable. At one time some conservatives, such as Ronald Reagan and John Tower, were pro-choice. Barry Goldwater continued to be pro-choice.

Because I'm a Christian, the assumption is made by many that I hate sinners; yet I don't hate sinners because that would be wrong. Besides, in my life I've been guilty of more than my share of shortcomings and just plain stupid judgment. I am appalled by all the hatred that is directed against gays and lesbians. I am opposed to them being demonized and subjected to outrageous lies, and I believe they deserve the same rights as everyone else. The recent activities by American evangelicals in Uganda has been nothing less than an exercise in vicarious cruelty.

But I do not support same-sex marriage, which was undreamed of not many years ago. I believe the institution of marriage to be inherently exclusive. Besides, considering the fact that men and women are not exactly alike, a child benefits the most when he or she has a mother and a father.

My heart bleeds for gays and lesbians. People don't understand that some kids end up with a homosexual predisposition through no fault of their own. This is a far cry from, say, the randy teenage boy who plots to seduce the nice teenage girl who lives down the street. But none of that matters to some people. For simply not supporting same-sex marriage, I am to be labeled a bigot, despite the fact that I had a close friend who was gay before there was even a Gay Lib movement. A casualty of the AIDS epidemic, he was one of the nicest persons I've ever met; and I thought very highly of him.

So, bobsal, I'm out of date; but that's just as well. No, I will never support the Republican Party.

Just consider me an oddball. (Actually, that's a fact. I am an oddball! Twisted Evil ) You probably think I'm out of my mind. Drunk But I'm not your enemy. In a sense, I'm not anyone's enemy. Aside from losing my temper a few times since I started posting, I'm one of the mildest members (although I do pump iron at a local health club) you'll encounter here. I implore you, consider me to be a friend! Cool Or you could view me as being just another harmless small-town crank! Smile

I'm also not popular here at all. So, I expect to get at least one "thumbs down." Probably more. I've learned to accept my punishment! http://www.free-dc.org/forum/images/smilies/spank.gif (I just wish those who dispense the punishment would reveal their identity -- in other words, their usernames.) The Internet is not a tolerant place. Wink

coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 13 Apr, 2014 02:34 pm
Quote:
The Internet is not a tolerant place.


It is early in the year, but that could be this years biggest understatement.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Apr, 2014 02:38 pm
@wmwcjr,
Quote:
I've been critical of conservatism on other points as well, such as the long record of the United States supporting right-wing dictators.


It hasn't only been conservatives that have supported that, Bill. Support of right wing brutal dictators is one of the few things most cons and line agree on.
wmwcjr
 
  0  
Reply Sun 13 Apr, 2014 02:44 pm
@coldjoint,
Yep. Laughing
0 Replies
 
wmwcjr
 
  2  
Reply Sun 13 Apr, 2014 02:52 pm
@JTT,
You're right. As a matter of fact, that's exactly what I was thinking as I posted my "mini-essay" above. Liberal Presidents such as FDR and LBJ supported such dictators. I remember reading a certain comment attributed to President Franklin Roosevelt regarding the U.S.-supported dictator in Nicaragua (the father of the dictator who was assassinated during the Carter administration): "He's a bastard, but he's our bastard!"
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 13 Apr, 2014 02:53 pm
Quote:
CBS’s Bob Schieffer Interviews Dem. Elijah Cummings, Ignores His Relationship With Lois Lerner


No news issue here? Why don't the networks cover this important story? There is only one answer. It makes the Democrats look bad. This is an important story. Don't you think if the Democrats could prove any off this investigation thing wrong , they would have done so?

All they say is you have found nothing. They never admit it is because evidence is being withheld. So this story is front page news to the real world no one wants you to know about.


http://www.mrc.org/biasalerts/cbss-bob-schieffer-interviews-dem-elijah-cummings-ignores-his-relationship-lois-lerner?utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed<br />
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 13 Apr, 2014 02:56 pm
@JTT,
Quote:
Would you like me to arrange for someone to read it to you?


Yes, that would be nice. Can you send Zinn?
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Apr, 2014 02:58 pm
@wmwcjr,
Why do you think it is, Bill, that these matters of fact whiz right by otherwise sentient, some even halfways intelligent a2kers? And most Americans.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Apr, 2014 03:02 pm
@coldjoint,
Maybe if I rephrase it in grade four speak.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Apr, 2014 03:09 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
No news issue here? Why don't the networks cover this important story? There is only one answer. It makes the Democrats look bad. This is an important story. Don't you think if the Democrats could prove any off this investigation thing wrong , they would have done so?

All they say is you have found nothing. They never admit it is because evidence is being withheld. So this story is front page news to the real world no one wants you to know about.


You are so blinded by your propaganda that you don't even realize what a flaming hypocrite you are. The USA media never cover anything of importance. Their job is to feed you sheeple your pablum.

If you are so interested in the truth, why aren't you covering,

CIA Torture Report Leaked - NOW WE KNOW WHAT'S BEING DONE IN OUR NAME
Forums: News, Politics, C I A, Torture Report
Tag this Topic • Get Email Updates • Email this Topic • Print this Page


http://able2know.org/topic/241059-1
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Sun 13 Apr, 2014 03:27 pm
@JTT,
Quote:
NOW WE KNOW WHAT'S BEING DONE IN OUR NAME


We also know what has done to our name.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Sun 13 Apr, 2014 03:36 pm
Racism, it is not just for Republicans anymore.

Quote:
Former Obama Czar Van Jones Smears Libertarians As Racists: “They Say They Love America But They Hate The Brown Folk, The Gays, The Lesbians”…
Quote:
In citing the Libertarian principle of economic liberty, Jones stated “They’ve taken their despicable ideology and used it a wrecking ball, that they have painted red, white and blue, to smash down every good thing in America.”


Economic liberty doesn't sit well with Communists.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.39 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 08:08:11