24
   

Congratulations, House Republicans!

 
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2014 03:55 pm
Quote:
San Diego protesters say Hillary Clinton not welcome there because of Benghazi


Let's hope more military towns run her ass out on a rail.

http://therightscoop.com/san-diego-protesters-say-hillary-clinton-not-welcome-there-because-of-benghazi/
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2014 04:16 pm
@coldjoint,
Right off the bat men need to butt out of whether abortion should be legal or not. Its a medical procedure and a medical issue strictly between a woman and her choice of professionals or purely on her own. Your being able to claim you personally would make a decision that would change peoples lives and kill others is breath-taking. And on an issue that will never, ever, EVER afect you.

It wouldn't bother me quite as much if your support for unborn individuals didn't end for those individuals at their birth. Support the death penalty, don't you? I guess its all about what your definition of murder is. Tell me you don't feel like a hypocrite.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2014 04:17 pm
@raprap,
My bad!
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2014 05:26 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
Support the death penalty, don't you? I guess its all about what your definition of murder is.


Yes I do. Why waste compassion on a murderer? He or she has demonstrated they are sadly lacking in that virtue. Also if enforced it would be quite a deterrent.
raprap
 
  2  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2014 06:20 pm
@coldjoint,
I say you first ColdDope. Why? Because ColdDope is an abortion that failed.

Hee Hee Hee.

Rap
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2014 07:08 pm
@coldjoint,
Oh look, a whole family of squirrels!
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2014 07:13 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Quote:
San Diego protesters say Hillary Clinton not welcome there because of Benghazi



More ignorant Americans who don't know that their government is the leading terrorist group in the world. That likely god double or triple if they are in the military. Look at how ignorant Baldimo was about the war crimes of I & A.

Look at how ignorant you are, cj, regarding the history of the USA.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2014 07:15 pm
@coldjoint,
Now you are beginning to understand the history of the USA, cj!
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  3  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2014 09:10 pm
@coldjoint,
The Pink Prevaricator wrote:



You certainly enjoy your irony don't you? Have you ever seen the numbers fabricated about deportation, unemployment, not to mention fund raising?

Conservative logic: The numbers must be made up if we don't agree with them.


I would love to see your evidence of any of those numbers being fabricated.

In the case of deportation, just because you think they should be in a different category doesn't make them fabricated. The arguments made about them being in the wrong category actually means the numbers are accepted as being real.

There is no evidence unemployment numbers are fabricated. The U3 numbers have been calculated the same way for decades. There is no change other than you want to argue they are fabricated. The markets see them as real. It is only complete idiots that claim they are fabricated.

Fund raising numbers are fabricated? If you have evidence then by all means report it to the FEC because it is a federal crime for anyone to report false fund raising numbers.

You claimed the numbers are not real. Provide your evidence to support your claim. Once again, you lie and then you will run away from your lie and not present any evidence.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2014 09:16 pm
@parados,

Quote:
I would love to see your evidence of any of those numbers being fabricated.


Funny how you didn't say anything about the healthcare law being based on lies.

I guess you know you have no argument there.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2014 09:21 pm
@coldjoint,
hey look, a bear chasing a squirrel!
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2014 09:24 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:




Funny how you didn't say anything about the healthcare law being based on lies.

I guess you know you have no argument there.


I didn't say anything because your statement is ludicrous and unfounded.
What lie was the health care law based on?
Are you going to argue that everyone in the US has insurance?
Are you going to argue that the US has the cheapest health care in the first world?

coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2014 09:28 pm
@parados,

Quote:
I didn't say anything because your statement is ludicrous and unfounded.


Unfounded? Do you really think it would have passed if people knew they would lose their policies and doctors? It wouldn't have. Obama and others simply lied, and they knew they were lying.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2014 09:52 pm
http://media.theweek.com/img/dir_0117/58626_cartoon_main.jpg?200
raprap
 
  2  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2014 05:03 am
@coldjoint,
ColdDope logic. When delusions are exposed as delusions, ColdDope withdraws into the imaginary world of cartoons to support those delusions.

ColdDope you really ought to see someone about those delusions. ColdDope is beginning to lose contact with reality.

Rap
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2014 07:37 am
@coldjoint,
Your statement is unfounded. You said the law was based on lies. The law is what has been passed. Are you arguing that the law was based on a few losing their doctors and bad insurance polices? If so, please show us where the law states as much.
revelette2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2014 09:58 am
Quote:
Jobs numbers released by The Bureau of Labor Statistics Friday were strong enough to keep stock markets in the green but brought little joy to jobs watchers.

Employers added 192,000 jobs in March, slightly below the 200,000 economists expected. The unemployment rate, which is drawn from a different survey of households, remained steady at 6.7%. The labor force participation rate came in at 63.2%, up slightly from February. The employment-population ratio was 58.9%, also just a tick above last month’s number.




The February employment number was revised up to plus 197,000 jobs. January payroll was also revised from 129,000 to plus 144,000, total employment gains those months were therefore 37,000 greater than previously reported. Job growth averaged 183,000 in the prior 12 months.

Following the news the S&P 500 and The Dow Jones Industrial Average were in the green in pre-market trading, gaining about .4% a piece.

“This current jobs report doesn’t move me in any significant way,” said Columbia Business School Professor Moshe Cohen in a phone call. He pointed out that a 10,000 move in the numbers one way or the other doesn’t tell us anything profound about the state of the economy. The market obsession with the jobs number, he says, stems from the Fed which is “carefully tweaking of policy to maintain sentiment and to keep the market steady.”

In recent months economists have largely agreed that severe winter weather has pulling down economic growth, including the jobs numbers. Cohen, however, points out that despite worse weather conditions in February there is not a meaningful difference between last month’s results and this months. “We aren’t seeing dramatic anything,” he says. So while weather potentially complicates the ability to track trends, job watchers simply aren’t asking the right questions.

Tom Gimbel, CEO of staffing firm LaSalle Network, similarly believes that markets need to get used to the 150,000s to 200,000 jobs added range as a “new normal.” He points out that the economy was spoiled from 1999 to 2007 when the internet was in growth mode. But now “job seekers have to stop looking for the job that is right for them” says Gimbel, instead looking to gain the skills needed for the jobs that exist.

Joseph Lake, US Analyst for The Economist Intelligence Unit, wrote in a note on the results, “Job growth gained momentum in February and March as the weather improved. Firms and consumers are making investments they deferred in January. This bounce in economic activity is driving companies to hire at a faster rate. The coldest start to the year since 1994 reduced business and consumer activity, discouraging firms from hiring workers. Still, the February and March payroll numbers are promising and suggest that the economy is shaking off the effects of the inclement weather.”




Taking a broader view Lake noted that the job market has been restrained since the recession but believe it is “shedding some of the slack.” For the first time in four years more people found jobs than dropped out of the work force. While private sector employment has finally hit it’s pre-recession peak, Lake warns against celebration, pointing to the historically low employment-population ratio.

The sectors with the most jobs added were business services with 57,000 jobs added, as well as health care and construction which gained 19,000 a piece. Employment was also up in the mining and logging industry. While local governments added 8,000 jobs, those gains were offset by a decline of 9,000 in federal government jobs.



source
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2014 09:59 am
@parados,
Quote:
. You said the(support for)) law was based on lies.


Yes I did. How much support would it have had if these things were known? About ******* zero.

And I am not talking about what the law is based, I am talking about the constant lies that had people thinking it was something Democrats and Obama knew it wasn't.. PERIOD.


http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/acorn_vote_fraud.jpg?w=500
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2014 10:16 am
And now an alternative to the ACA offered by a Republican, and a man of color. That alone should make it un-debatable.

http://thefederalist.com/2014/04/04/how-states-can-offer-an-obamacare-alternative/

How States Can Offer An Obamacare Alternative
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2014 10:21 am
Quote:
Left blames Fort Hood shooting on George Bush in warp speed

Quote:

It didn’t even take 24 hours for the left to politicize Wednesday’s shooting at Fort Hood Texas. In addition to using the tragedy as a springboard for stricter gun control legislation, some are even blaming the event on — you guessed it — George W. Bush.

One Twitter user with the handle Rashid Hussein Obama, described himself as pretty much pro-everything, including pro-choice and pro-life. Apparently that doesn’t include pro-Bush, because the morning after the shooting, he tweeted:

Four more soldiers were just killed in Fort Hood as a result of GW Bush and Cheney’s war for oil. #FortHoodShooting

— Rashid Hussein Obama (@rashid7053) April 3, 2014

Huh? How did he arrive at that conclusion? Radio host Fred “Fred For Your Head” Reiss was only too happy to fill in the blanks with this tweet:

An Iraq-vet shooter with PSD at Fort Hood. Just another legacy of George W Bush & Co. Enjoy your painting W.

— Fred Reiss (@fredforyourhead) April 3, 2014


Nice that these people get WiFi in the sewer.

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/04/04/left-blames-fort-hood-shooting-on-george-bush-in-warp-speed-110387?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 09:18:48