@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
Quote: It does not cancel facts and reality however.
The reality IS that Scalia did state as Advocate paraphrased. AND, that's a fact.
You must learn to deal with it and embrace it as prt of HELLER.
Farmer, that has
NO precedential value because no such question was litigated.
It was
not argued by trial counsel; no evidence was received into the record on those points.
Those issues were
NOT CONSIDERED; therefore, we need
not
learn to deal with it nor to embrace it.
At some future point, the issue of "equal protection of the laws"
will be heard and adjudicated.
I do
not foresee that the USSC will hold that farmers,
Italians, nor young people can be the victims of government discrimination
such that thay can be screwn out of their rights to defend their lives
from predatory violence. Thus ends licensure.
The issue of uniting 2nd Amendment protection with the right to travel will be adjucated,
along with the
ubiquity, the omnipresence of US Constitutional protection
EVERYWHERE in America.
As the 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago put it
in
Moore v. Madigan:
the place where a citizen has the right to defend himself
is the place where he is attacked.
That will be considered in future litigation by the USSC.
David
(However, I must admit that a certain frequent one-sentence expression of yours actually makes me chuckle. 