42
   

Snowdon is a dummy

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 09:05 am
Theresa May, the home secretary, will do a broadcast interview later about the Miranda affair, according to the BBC.

[I could quote her even before she's on air Very Happy ]
JTT
 
  0  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 09:12 am
@JTT,
Quote:

Rep. Dennis Kucinich: Abolish The NSA And Give Snowden A Parade

...

Well, you know it's illegal to lie to Congress, but everyone lies to Congress. As soon as they raise their right hand, watch out! Clapper should be held responsible, but he won't be, because that's the condition we're in right now. In a just world, Snowden, we'd be having ticker tape parades for him. But that's not what's going to happen.

...

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130819/01445524226/rep-dennis-kucinich-abolish-nsa-give-snowden-parade.shtml
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  4  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 09:17 am
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:

It merely is a request for people taking a particular position to put more thought into that position.


I've put a great deal of thought into my particular position, Frank. I've lived my nearly 60-year life around it. We are a constitutional republic with the rule of law that has been tragically, imo, usurped into a secret society of secret laws, secret courts, secret oversight (which has been clearly shown to be no oversight at all), at incredible cost to the tax-payer both in terms of dollars, freedoms lost and any sense of privacy.

I no longer email friends who live abroad. They no longer email me either. Not because we have anything to hide, but sharing stories of my life and the lives of my children with friends outside the US were never intended to be shared with some anonymous fuckhead at the NSA.

And, for what? Because it allows you to sleep better at night? Good for you.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 09:17 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:
That comment from David Davis fails logic! It doesn't say anything of the sort...and does not even infer that.
I'd quoted him in (nearly) full length above earlier - you might have missed that.



Walter Hinteler wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:
That comment from David Davis fails logic! It doesn't say anything of the sort...and does not even infer that.
I'd quoted him in (nearly) full length above earlier - you might have missed that.


I did read that, Walter. But the remark I quoted goes to the arrest of David Miranda…and I still feel THAT remark fails logic 101.

There is no explicit suggestion that anyone not on our side is on the side of the terrorists…nor is there an inference that is the case.

They are saying “people on that side ought to reconsider what they are suggesting.”

The “anyone not on our side is on the side of the terrorists” is pure hyperbole.


Or at least, in my opinion it is.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 09:18 am
From the Columbia Journalism Review

Guardian bombshells in an escalating battle against journalism
Quote:
[...]
Miranda was serving as a human passenger pigeon, shuttling encrypted files on USB drives between filmmaker Laura Poitras and Greenwald because, as the whole world now knows, the Internet is fully bugged by the US and UK governments. So the UK, using an anti-terrorism statute, arrested Miranda on arrival at Heathrow, interrogated him for 9 hours, threatened to arrest him, and took his stuff. The war on whistleblowers has now escalated to disrupting journalists’ communications.

In light of Rusbridger’s disclosures, it’s even clearer that the detention of Miranda is part of an attack on American journalists authorized at the highest levels of the British government, and it’s an attack that is at the very least implicitly backed by the Obama administration.
[...]
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 09:20 am
@JPB,
JPB wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:

It merely is a request for people taking a particular position to put more thought into that position.


I've put a great deal of thought into my particular position, Frank. I've lived my nearly 60-year life around it. We are a constitutional republic with the rule of law that has been tragically, imo, usurped into a secret society of secret laws, secret courts, secret oversight (which has been clearly shown to be no oversight at all), at incredible cost to the tax-payer both in terms of dollars, freedoms lost and any sense of privacy.

I no longer email friends who live abroad. They no longer email me either. Not because we have anything to hide, but sharing stories of my life and the lives of my children with friends outside the US were never intended to be shared with some anonymous fuckhead at the NSA.

And, for what? Because it allows you to sleep better at night? Good for you.


My suggestion would be you should put more thought into it. I sleep fine. If you want to be paranoid about what you say to friends in emails...what can I tell ya?

I email friends from abroad often...and I truly do not give a damn if the messages are intercepted as part of a governmental plan to keep the country safer.
BillRM
 
  2  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 09:29 am
@JPB,
Quote:
I no longer email friends who live abroad. They no longer email me either. Not because we have anything to hide, but sharing stories of my life and the lives of my children with friends outside the US were never intended to be shared with some anonymous fuckhead at the NSA.


Have you and your friends go to the following website http://www.pgpi.org/ and download pgp.

After installing and setting it up you can laugh at NSA and that is just how worthless this spying program is against anyone who take any level of precautions.

The NSA programs are design and only good at doing mass spying of the world populations not a very useful weapon against terrorists.

If you have any problems with getting this program working just send me a private message and I will aid you.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  4  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 09:35 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
I email friends from abroad often...and I truly do not give a damn if the messages are intercepted as part of a governmental plan to keep the country safer.


Feel free to allow them to read all your private mail but until the fourth amendment is repeal those of us that do not care to have them in our business have a right to privacy.

The government when not acting within the framework of the constitution is a far far greater danger to our freedoms and well being then all the terrorists in the world.
JPB
 
  2  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 09:41 am
@Walter Hinteler,
from your link

Quote:
In light of Rusbridger’s disclosures, it’s even clearer that the detention of Miranda is part of an attack on American journalists authorized at the highest levels of the British government, and it’s an attack that is at the very least implicitly backed by the Obama administration.

We have the spectacle of communications between two American journalists-in-exile—reduced to passing information via courier because their government is spying on everything they do online—busted up by the US’s top ally, apparently with no protest from the Obama administration, which was given a heads-up.

On top of that, Greenwald’s paper has been threatened by its own government with prior restraint and had its hard drives smashed in its basement to make a (stupid) point.

This is police-state stuff. We need to know the American government’s role in these events—and its stance on them—sooner rather than later.
emphasis added
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  5  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 09:42 am
@Frank Apisa,
and, only those with something to hide care about privacy, right Frank?

horse ****.
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 09:43 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
I email friends from abroad often...and I truly do not give a damn if the messages are intercepted as part of a governmental plan to keep the country safer.


Feel free to allow them to read all your private mail but until the fourth amendment is repeal those of us that do not care to have them in our business have a right to privacy.

The government when not acting within the framework of the constitution is a far far greater danger to our freedoms and well being then all the terrorists in the world.


Fine.

So...have your privacy.

And if you want to accept the drivel that a government acting as our government is now acting...is not acting within the framework of the Constitution...accept it.

I have no problem with that.

I simply disagree...and I hope a majority of Americans disagree also.
Rockhead
 
  4  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 09:43 am
@JPB,
big brother is your friend.

here, have some soma...
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  -1  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 09:44 am
@JPB,
JPB wrote:

and, only those with something to hide care about privacy, right Frank?

horse ****.


Did I say that????

There are people who oppose your position who claim that people like you are siding with the terrorists.

That is nonsense.

So is your comment here.

Try to stay focused.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 09:47 am
@JPB,
JPB wrote:
Quote:
I find this deeply upsetting on many levels, not the least of which is that Groklaw is a needless casualty in a stupid power struggle among weak-minded, power hungry government officials who don't even seem to comprehend what a mess they've created.


So let me get this straight: a blogger thinks that maybe her e-mails might possibly be read by the NSA, so she shuts down her site as a response? Yeah, I'd agree that the blog is a needless casualty.
BillRM
 
  2  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 09:59 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
I simply disagree...and I hope a majority of Americans disagree also.


It so then the fear of a few terrorists had been used as a means to take away our liberties successfully.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 10:03 am
I'm really wondering why the British government exerts pressure on the Guardian about Snowden's documents ... although many of those are already published.

And why they wanted the hard-drive to be destroyed .... although it's known that copies exist here and there.


The Guardian his been one of the few newspapers which weren't cuddling with the UK-government .....


cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 10:05 am
@JPB,
JPB, I used to think that what I communicated by telephone or my computer were not that special or "private," but after reading media reports and a2k, I've also concluded that our government has over-stepped its bounds on the protection of our privacy.

I'm now pissed at Obama and what he allowed our government to do. He usurped the Constitution, and the other two branches allowed him to do it.

Our government is broken, and I'm not so sure it can be repaired during my lifetime.

I fear for our children and future generations, but a government out of control is the most dangerous!
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  2  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 10:09 am
@joefromchicago,
Quote:
So let me get this straight: a blogger thinks that maybe her e-mails might possibly be read by the NSA, so she shuts down her site as a response? Yeah, I'd agree that the blog is a needless casualty.


An one US encrypted email company had shuted down completely and another shut their email service due to not wishing to betrayed their customers by obeying secret national security letters to do mass spying on them.

Then how many billions/trillions do you think that US based cloud storage firms are going to loss in the upcoming decades when even US firms refused to trust their private business records to them?
izzythepush
 
  2  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 10:09 am
@Walter Hinteler,
I'm sure they wouldn't stop anyone who was shagging a Murdoch.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 20 Aug, 2013 10:12 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
I simply disagree...and I hope a majority of Americans disagree also.


It so then the fear of a few terrorists had been used as a means to take away our liberties successfully.


You ought to try posting without hyperbole.

Anyway, there are people who want to get onto an airplane without being searched. Their desire for personal privacy is such that they consider a search to be an unwarranted intrusion.

I think everyone who boards a plane ought to be subject to search.

We disagree…those people and I.

Do you think the right to personal privacy is so compelling that searches of individuals and their baggage when boarding an airplane ought not to happen?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Snowdon is a dummy
  3. » Page 97
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 8.9 seconds on 11/29/2024 at 08:43:15