@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:
For one thing none of the three are actually liberal. They are at best slightly right to middle of the road. We havent had a liberal president since Kennedy. In my opinion. Not interested in trying to defend a bunch of politicians who pass laws that that get them big contributions from moneyed rich which encompasses all politicians so I wont defend my opinion. GO ORAL BOY.
Johnson came after Kennedy...and he was more liberal than Kennedy.
One of the MAIN reasons there are not more liberal politicians and presidents is that LIBERALS have managed to make the very word "liberal" toxic to the American public.
That is not an easy thing to have done...but liberals have managed to do it.
I guess it can be argued that the nut-cases on the far right helped...but they were merely cheerleaders and urgers-on. The real damage was done by that lack of reality of the far left.
Now, those of us who actually want to see safety-net programs protected and expanded have to do it DESPITE the involvement of liberals rather than in conjuction with them.
Think about it: Just about every conservative politician in this country BRAGS about his/her conservatism...and accuses other conservative politicians running in primaries of not being conservative enough.
Can you imagine a liberal politician bragging about being a liberal...or claiming he/she is more liberal than an opponent in a primary fight.