42
   

Snowdon is a dummy

 
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 10:30 am
@Frank Apisa,
Human beings tend to take liberties with the truth when their own interest is at stake. That much is obvious to anyone who ever bought a used car.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 10:50 am
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:

Human beings tend to take liberties with the truth when their own interest is at stake. That much is obvious to anyone who ever bought a used car.


Without a doubt...human beings tend to take liberties with the truth when their own interest is at stake.

And you are correct...that should be obvious to anyone.

What does that have to do with what we were discussing?

Read what I originally wrote. Nothing in there negates anything you said up above (all of which I agree with, by the way).

But whether the human beings involved are taking liberties with the truth or not...I MUCH, MUCH prefer to use what they are saying as the basis for the decisions I am making on these issue...than to use yours.
Olivier5
 
  1  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 11:11 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
I MUCH, MUCH prefer to use what they are saying as the basis for the decisions I am making on these issue...than to use yours.

Is that the only choice you have? Little me or the NSA? Poor you.

What about reading the report from the panel of experts appointed by your own president? You know, the guy you voted for.

"In our view, the current storage by the government of bulk meta-data
creates potential risks to public trust, personal privacy, and civil liberty. We
recognize that the government might need access to such meta-data, which
should be held instead either by private providers or by a private third
party. This approach would allow the government access to the relevant
information when such access is justified, and thus protect national
security without unnecessarily threatening privacy and liberty. Consistent
with this recommendation, we endorse a broad principle for the future: as
a general rule and without senior policy review, the government should
not be permitted to collect and store mass, undigested, non-public personal
information about US persons for the purpose of enabling future queries
and data-mining for foreign intelligence purposes.
"

https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2013-12-12_rg_final_report.pdf
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 11:17 am
@Olivier5,
A majority of the people charged with protecting America say they want the powers granted in the original act. A majority of the politicians charged with doing what the people of America want...say they want the people charged with protecting America to have the powers granted in the original act.

I'll go with that.

If you feel that is the wrong choice...go with something different.

I do not see the problem.
Olivier5
 
  1  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 11:35 am
@Frank Apisa,
No problem at all. You're entitled to be a sheep.

You know what are the four greatest lies in the universe?
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 11:59 am
@Olivier5,
I knew from our last encounter that you were not an especially good loser, Olivier.

But now I see you are not even a good winner.

I agreed with much of what you said...and conceded that you have the right to disagree. But rather than leave it at that...you want to go the insult route...and get yourself all bloodied up again.

You ought to learn your lesson...and stop thinking that being willing to take a severe beating makes you look like you are brave. Actually, it just makes you look like you are foolish.

But keep at it. I'm willing to meet your needs.
Wink



Olivier5
 
  1  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 12:03 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Thanks for the laugh, Frank.

You know what are the four biggest lies in the universe?
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 12:15 pm
@Olivier5,
No problem with the laugh, Olivier. Keep in mind that he who laughs last...laughs best.

I'll credit you where it is due...and here is one of those opportunities. You are an excellent starter of things.

Me...I'm not good at starting things. My specialty is finishing them.
revelette2
 
  1  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 12:39 pm
@Olivier5,
Actually it is much easier today to go along with the thinking that all spying done by government is by it's nature intrusive and in violation of our natural civil liberties. It's much harder to be nuanced with shades of greys and trying to explain to people here without being pounced on and insulted for have a different outlook based on our own thinking and conclusions. If we think differently, surely, we must be blind sheep of the shepherds which in this case would be the big bad government; or even yet, here in this thread, the US government.

I have agreed more than once based on evidence such as Oliver pointed out that mass data storing does not seem to be more good than harm so it may as well be done away with.
Olivier5
 
  2  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 12:55 pm
@revelette2,
Hey, I still think the same. Targeted signal intell is A-Okay and useful. It's mass collection which is ineffective and dangerous for civil life.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 12:56 pm
@revelette2,

Excellent comment, Revelette.

That is what I have been trying to say to Olivier…that after assessing what we choose to assess…we come to different conclusions.

Olivier quoted the “panel of experts” saying, among other things, that the procedures endangers personal privacy.

Well…the technology of today endangers personal privacy even more…and it is not going to get any less sophisticated in the future.

I know you do not agree with me on this (neither, apparently, does Olivier), but as far as I can see, personal privacy to any significant degree is a thing of the past…as dead as the dinosaurs.

It simply does not matter to me as much as to some others. I see it as a potentially good thing for humankind.

In any case, so that this does not get into an unnecessary battle between Olivier and me…I will extend my hand in friendship to him.

We disagree on this issue, Olivier. That does not make me a sheep. I extend my hand to you and ask that we leave it at: We agree to disagree on the issue…and no need for either of us to negatively characterize the other on that account.

I apologize for any negative characterizations I have made here.

What say?
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 12:59 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Your specialty is to try and exhaust your opponents. Just because you're the last guy left in the room doesn't mean you finished anything.

Try to think, as opposed to trying to say Nay nay nay forever...
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 01:04 pm
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:

Your specialty is to try and exhaust your opponents. Just because you're the last guy left in the room doesn't mean you finished anything.

Try to think, as opposed to trying to say Nay nay nay forever...


I am not saying nay, nay, nay forever.

In any case, I once again extend my hand and ask that we simply agree to disagree...rather than going through a whole bunch of nonsense.
Olivier5
 
  1  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 01:19 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Fine with me...
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 01:29 pm
The World Says No to Surveillance

By Edward J. Snowden

Quote:
TWO years ago today, three journalists and I worked nervously in a Hong Kong hotel room, waiting to see how the world would react to the revelation that the National Security Agency had been making records of nearly every phone call in the United States. In the days that followed, those journalists and others published documents revealing that democratic governments had been monitoring the private activities of ordinary citizens who had done nothing wrong.

Within days, the United States government responded by bringing charges against me under World War I-era espionage laws. The journalists were advised by lawyers that they risked arrest or subpoena if they returned to the United States. Politicians raced to condemn our efforts as un-American, even treasonous.

Privately, there were moments when I worried that we might have put our privileged lives at risk for nothing — that the public would react with indifference, or practiced cynicism, to the revelations.

Never have I been so grateful to have been so wrong.


more.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 01:36 pm
@InfraBlue,
I'm delighted he was wrong when he though he was putting his life and freedom at risk for nothing, Blue.

Now I hope he comes back to the United States to get a fair trial...and show that his heroism knows no bounds.

Or...he can just rest in the heaven of privacy in which he now resides.
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 03:22 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:
Now I hope he comes back to the United States to get a fair trial...

Fat chance.
izzythepush
 
  0  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 03:43 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:
Now I hope he comes back to the United States to get a fair trial


He's got more chance of getting a decent cup of tea.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Fri 5 Jun, 2015 07:51 pm
@InfraBlue,
We agree there, Blue. I also doubt he will come back to the United States to face a fair trial.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  1  
Sat 6 Jun, 2015 03:28 am
@InfraBlue,
Thanks. Worth quoting some more.

Quote:
Two years on, the difference is profound. In a single month, the N.S.A.’s invasive call-tracking program was declared unlawful by the courts and disowned by Congress. After a White House-appointed oversight board investigation found that this program had not stopped a single terrorist attack, even the president who once defended its propriety and criticized its disclosure has now ordered it terminated.

This is the power of an informed public.

Ending the mass surveillance of private phone calls under the Patriot Act is a historic victory for the rights of every citizen, but it is only the latest product of a change in global awareness. Since 2013, institutions across Europe have ruled similar laws and operations illegal and imposed new restrictions on future activities. The United Nations declared mass surveillance an unambiguous violation of human rights. In Latin America, the efforts of citizens in Brazil led to the Marco Civil, an Internet Bill of Rights. Recognizing the critical role of informed citizens in correcting the excesses of government, the Council of Europe called for new laws to protect whistle-blowers.

Beyond the frontiers of law, progress has come even more quickly. Technologists have worked tirelessly to re-engineer the security of the devices that surround us, along with the language of the Internet itself. Secret flaws in critical infrastructure that had been exploited by governments to facilitate mass surveillance have been detected and corrected. Basic technical safeguards such as encryption — once considered esoteric and unnecessary — are now enabled by default in the products of pioneering companies like Apple, ensuring that even if your phone is stolen, your private life remains private. Such structural technological changes can ensure access to basic privacies beyond borders, insulating ordinary citizens from the arbitrary passage of anti-privacy laws, such as those now descending upon Russia.

Emphasis added. Interesting that Snowden is now criticizing Russia, me think. The guy does have a pair.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Snowdon is a dummy
  3. » Page 631
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 07/05/2025 at 07:58:51