42
   

Snowdon is a dummy

 
 
JTT
 
  0  
Mon 22 Jul, 2013 11:23 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
We do uphold our Constitution and our treaties.


More bald-faced lies from a world famous bald-faced liar.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Mon 22 Jul, 2013 11:24 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
No way the Fourth Amendment is violated. The database is only accessed with probable cause and with a warrant from a judge.


Either appalling ignorance or more of your world famous bald-faced lies.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Mon 22 Jul, 2013 11:38 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:
Quote:
Now, maybe I was making too much of your silence on the other thread, but you still haven't answered my question. If you believe the above then shouldn't Robert Seldon Lady be deported to Italy for breaking Italian law the same way that Snowden should be deported to America.
Quote:
The story of how a Milan CIA station chief became a fugitive, now caught in Panama
By Max Fisher

When Robert Seldon Lady first arrived in Milan, Italy’s fashion and business hub, he was officially listed as an employee of the U.S. State Department with the title of deputy consul. In fact, he was the head of the CIA’s Milan station. That was 2000. Within a few years, Lady would become an international fugitive on the run from Italian police; he would go from a highly respected CIA officer to, for many in Europe, a symbol of everything that was wrong with the United States’ war on terror and a means to publicly pressure the Bush administration.
On Thursday, Lady was detained in Panama, possibly to answer for the Italian extradition charges that have stood against him for years. The story of Lady’s journey over the past decade is controversial, disputed and full of holes. But it is a fascinating episode from a complicated period in U.S. foreign policy – one that, as his recent detention reminds us, isn’t so long ago as we might think.
Two good retellings of Lady’s downfall and the incident that so angered Italian officials are a well-reviewed 2010 book A Kidnapping in Milan: The CIA on Trial,” by journalist Steve Hendricks, and Matthew Cole’s exhaustive 2007 Esquire story. I’ve drawn from them both here.
After Sept. 11, 2001, CIA stations across much of Europe ramped up efforts to find and neutralize possible terrorist threats; several of the al-Qaeda operatives involved in the 2001 hijackings had originally operated out of Hamburg. Lady’s Milan station, working with Italian counterterrorism officials, dismantled three cells in northern Italy in just two years, according to Cole.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/07/18/the-story-of-how-a-milan-cia-station-chief-became-a-fugitive-now-caught-in-panama/

The CIA did not in any way break any Italian law. The Italian judiciary just intentionally and maliciously prosecutes and convicts innocent Americans.

At this point, the only solution to the Italian problem seems to be a military one. I recommend DroneStriking most of the judges in Italy.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 02:59 am
@RABEL222,
You need to study History. I never claimed their circumstances were identical, but they both stood up against abuses of power.

You seem very relaxed about the whole thing. I'm naturally distrustful of power, and with good reason. You shouldn't assume that what the government does is in your best interests.

Invading Iraq made you a lot less secure, and the intel on that was shoddy to say the least.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 03:02 am
@Moment-in-Time,
It's not cowardly to avoid being tortured, it's common sense. Manning was tortured, and that's a fact. Maybe if Manning had been treated humanely you would have a point.
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  3  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 03:23 am
@RABEL222,
Not disparaging Rosa Parks' legacy - but she was taking on a local ordinance, Montgomery's bus laws - and bizarrely she hadn't broken the law, the habit of making coloured folk give up their seats in the coloured section when a white couldn't get a seat in the white section was a tradition. Regardless,
wikipedia wrote:
The next day, Parks was tried on charges of disorderly conduct and violating a local ordinance. The trial lasted 30 minutes. After being found guilty and fined $10, plus $4 in court costs


Call me crazy but I think Snowden would be happy to pay the $14, even with adjustments for inflation.

The Parks case was symbolic - there was no federal law to be changed about buses and she certainly wasn't the first arrested under Montgomery's bus by laws. The NAACP was backing Ms Parks and funding her appeal.

Who will fund Snowden's defence. Who will make the Feds adhere to their own legislation?

wikipedia again wrote:
Noted legislative achievements during this phase of the Civil Rights Movement were passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, that banned discrimination based on "race, color, religion, or national origin" in employment practices and public accommodations; the Voting Rights Act of 1965, that restored and protected voting rights; the Immigration and Nationality Services Act of 1965, that dramatically opened entry to the U.S. to immigrants other than traditional European groups; and the Fair Housing Act of 1968, that banned discrimination in the sale or rental of housing. African Americans re-entered politics in the South, and across the country young people were inspired to action.


Nothing about buses though.
Olivier5
 
  3  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 06:18 am
@Moment-in-Time,
Quote:
Rosa Parks did not break the law and cowardly run away to keep from facing those she defied.

If there was a risk that they would have tortured her, kept her in jail for years on end without a trial, or sent her to Gitmo or an equivalent torture camp, maybe she would have fled... It is absurd and mean to accuse someone who is taking as much risk as Snowden does, a 'coward'. I thought higher if you MIT.

The real coward in this story is so evidently Obama, who protects a police state which tortures people day in and day out in Gitmo and elsewhere. He's a joke.
engineer
 
  3  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 08:24 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

JPB wrote:
Clapper outright lied to Congress when asked a specific point-blank question.

I've heard this claimed a lot, but I haven't heard the details of the alleged lie, and frankly I'm skeptical.

What is the lie he is supposed to have told?


Here it is along with his admission and apology for that lie.

Quote:
Clapper was asked during a hearing in March by Sen. Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, if the NSA gathered “any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans.”

At first, Clapper answered definitively: “No.”

Pressed by Wyden, Clapper changed his answer. “Not wittingly,” he said. “There are cases where they could inadvertently perhaps collect, but not wittingly.”
izzythepush
 
  1  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 08:51 am
@engineer,
One problem you have with Oralboy, is his definition of facts. Whereas most of us define a fact as something that is true and can be independently verified, Oralboy's definition is whatever is in his head at the moment. That's why he constantly claims that nobody can disprove his facts even though the nonsense he spouts has been disproven umpteen times.

Whenever he's faced with real facts that disprove his twisted world view he ignores them.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 09:12 am
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:
If there was a risk that they would have tortured her, kept her in jail for years on end without a trial, or sent her to Gitmo or an equivalent torture camp, maybe she would have fled...

Guantanamo is far from a torture camp. If you want to find torture in Cuba, you'll have to find where Raul Castro keeps his political prisoners.

Snowden does face many years in prison, but he'll get a trial first, and he won't be tortured.


Olivier5 wrote:
The real coward in this story is so evidently Obama, who protects a police state which tortures people day in and day out in Gitmo and elsewhere. He's a joke.

There has never been any torture at Guantanamo, and there has never been any torture under Obama.
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 09:13 am
@engineer,
engineer wrote:
Here it is along with his admission and apology for that lie.

Quote:
Clapper was asked during a hearing in March by Sen. Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, if the NSA gathered “any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans.”

At first, Clapper answered definitively: “No.”

Pressed by Wyden, Clapper changed his answer. “Not wittingly,” he said. “There are cases where they could inadvertently perhaps collect, but not wittingly.”

Hmmm. What were they doing asking him in public about a top secret program?
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 09:27 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

Hmmm. What were they doing asking him in public about a top secret program?
Hmmm. And why do you think, oralloy, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is publishing testimonies?
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 09:31 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:
There has never been any torture at Guantanamo, ...
Your facts in one half-sentence versus the details in the 577-page report ...
izzythepush
 
  1  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 09:32 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Here's another fact Oralboy ignores.

Quote:
This report is a product of our united efforts. This report uniquely recounts the experiences of prisoners inside Guantánamo Bay prison. Other reports, for the most part, rely on the statements of released prisoners who were willing to tell their stories. Appearing in this report are the accounts of torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment drawn directly from habeas counsels’ unclassified notes. Prisoner statements were made to counsel during in-person interviews conducted at Guantánamo beginning in the fall of 2004.


http://ccrjustice.org/learn-more/reports/report%3A-torture-and-cruel,-inhuman,-and-degrading-treatment-prisoners-guantanamo-
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  1  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 09:41 am
@izzythepush,
If you really did much reading on this site you would know that I was against the Vietnaum war before most people knew their was one. Against the Iraq war when the idiot Bush was telling all the gullible fools that there were weapons of mass destruction. Against sending American boys to support the expansist policies of Israel, England, and all the European powers who are too cheap to fund their own military. I would wish that the U S of A had a military just large enough to defend its borders. I have stated this many times on this site over many years. But you are just another JTT who throws **** at the wall to see if any sticks. You are gitting to the point where, just as is true of JTT, people arnt taking you seriously because of the same old the U S of A is the great satan stick. Does my government do things I dont like? Of course. Do I protest and write letters, of course. You would be much better off to watch your own government rather than everyone elses. Walter does and I think has found his government isent without sin as the old saying goes.
RABEL222
 
  1  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 09:46 am
@hingehead,
I wasent the one trying to compare apples and oranges. Your post should have gone to Izzy. I still think that if one wants a hero Rosa is the one. At that time in that place they were killing blacks for much less. She was risking her life, he is not.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 09:52 am
@RABEL222,
Those against equality for blacks even killed white demonstrators. That's called "hate" and idiocy!
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 09:55 am
@RABEL222,
I know I'm not risking my life, I never claimed I was.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 10:02 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Your facts in one half-sentence versus the details in the 577-page report ...

If you weren't a gutless coward with a history of lying, I might have cared to ask you what report you were talking about.

But instead I'll just note that the CIA's waterboarding was done on European soil, not at Guantanamo.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  0  
Tue 23 Jul, 2013 10:02 am
@RABEL222,
If you actually knew what was going on you'd realise that the British Military, along with the French is considerably larger than that of the rest of Europe.

Don't fool yourself, America's military power has absolutely nothing to do with propping up deficiencies in other European powers, it's about projecting America's power.

Your alternative of splendid isolation has been tried before, it didn't end very well, Pearl Harbor ring any bells?

There is a happy medium, interventions in Kosovo and Sierra Leone were both very successful.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Snowdon is a dummy
  3. » Page 63
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.15 seconds on 11/22/2024 at 02:11:32