@RABEL222,
Not disparaging Rosa Parks' legacy - but she was taking on a local ordinance, Montgomery's bus laws - and bizarrely she hadn't broken the law, the habit of making coloured folk give up their seats in the coloured section when a white couldn't get a seat in the white section was a tradition. Regardless,
wikipedia wrote:The next day, Parks was tried on charges of disorderly conduct and violating a local ordinance. The trial lasted 30 minutes. After being found guilty and fined $10, plus $4 in court costs
Call me crazy but I think Snowden would be happy to pay the $14, even with adjustments for inflation.
The Parks case was symbolic - there was no federal law to be changed about buses and she certainly wasn't the first arrested under Montgomery's bus by laws. The NAACP was backing Ms Parks and funding her appeal.
Who will fund Snowden's defence. Who will make the Feds adhere to their own legislation?
wikipedia again wrote:Noted legislative achievements during this phase of the Civil Rights Movement were passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, that banned discrimination based on "race, color, religion, or national origin" in employment practices and public accommodations; the Voting Rights Act of 1965, that restored and protected voting rights; the Immigration and Nationality Services Act of 1965, that dramatically opened entry to the U.S. to immigrants other than traditional European groups; and the Fair Housing Act of 1968, that banned discrimination in the sale or rental of housing. African Americans re-entered politics in the South, and across the country young people were inspired to action.
Nothing about buses though.