@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:Oh...so you think the US will allow itself to be blackmailed.
I see.
Well...I don't think so.
I don't think that blackmail is the correct word ... here, because I really think it was a kind of (sic!) whistleblowing.
Quote:“Anytime a whistleblower is punished for pointing out waste or misconduct, it sends the signal to other employees that doing the right thing will be met with potentially harsh repercussions,” Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Judiciary Committee.
NB: Sen. Grassley didn't refer with his remark to Snowden but to a report that will be the focus of a Senate hearing tomorrow.
I know that the USA doesn't pay ransom demand for any hostage - why should they make a deal about some secret but outdated papers?
Having thought about it - the damage is already done, trouble with allies diminshed, so why should there be a deal? Either a trial or some solotution will be found to solve the case in Russia ...