@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
I am saying that Rand Paul is not competent authority to make charges of the sort we are discussing.
Hi, F.A. Just a quick word on the Libertarian, Rand Paul....I'm aware he's not the subject of this thread, but he has surfaced a few times.
The relentless boisterous Rand Paul is running a purely political campaign as he could not care one iota for the substance at hand.....he's making a squawking noise, hoping to be heard; this blowhard is trying to create his case for the 2016 presidential election. He has also brought to the surface again the sexual scandal which threatened President Bill Clinton's presidency with the then 22-year-old White House intern Monica Lewinsky. It was consensual because Monica was over 21 and thoroughly infatuated with the President , yet Paul (after 30 yrs) is crying Clinton was a sexual predator taking advantage of a young girl working in his office, and anyone allowing Clinton to fund raise for them is culpable of condoning such action.
Paul Rand was given a withering censure by the conservative Wall Street Journal for saying Edward Snowden was a hero. The Journal said Rand Paul "was unsuitable to be Commander-in-chief."
"WSJ: Rand Paul ‘Unsuitable To Be Commander In Chief’
"Scathing editorial in Wednesday’s Wall Street Journal, regarding Sen. Rand Paul‘s (R-Ky.) defense of admitted NSA leaker Edward Snowden:
"As President, Mr. Paul couldn’t behave like some ACLU legal gadfly. He’d be responsible for setting standards for the entire security bureaucracy. To offer Mr. Snowden leniency on such terms would send a signal that any federal employee could leak any secret as long as he claims a higher moral cause. …
"If Mr. Paul wants to make that case, he can do so in the GOP primaries. We don’t agree, and we doubt the courts or the American public will either. But arguing that Edward Snowden is some kind of national hero shows an unseriousness about national security that would make him unsuitable to be Commander in Chief."
http://www.dailypaul.com/309663/wsj-rand-paul-unsuitable-to-be-commander-in-chief
______________
Moment-in-time writes:
Rand comes across as flaky after his plagiarism from other authors' works including Wikipedia, pretending the writing was his exclusively. This brazen politician is trying his best to appeal to the Tea Party base and then he'll try to appeal to mainstream America. In my personal opinion, a snow ball has more of a chance of surviving in hell than Rand Paul has of becoming president of the US.
So would I. In fact, I think Ted Cruz has more of a chance than Rand Paul, and everyone is aware Cruz is stuck in "NOWHERE LAND" as far as the US presidency goes.
