@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
Yes, it is! You said you never ask for proof that god exists or does not exist.
And I did not ask for proof.
Read what I wrote...I DID NOT ASK FOR PROOF.
Quote:In philosophy, proof is the evidence or argument that compels the mind to accept an assertion as true.. The Idividual's belief is the proof.
First of all...we were not discussing philosophy. We were discussing Snowden. Then you brought in a discussion I was having about religion.
This philosophy nonsense is just that...absolute blather.
Apparently it is occasioned by the fact that you are not man enough to acknowledge that you are wrong on this issue.
It's really just the two of us, ci. Most of the other people are probably thinking we are a couple of old farts just arguing nonsense.
And we are.
But your nonsense is nonsense on an entirely lower plane.
I said I NEVER ask for proof...only for evidence.
I asked for evidence...NOT FOR PROOF.
Now, since you do not have the ethical wherewithal to acknowledge that you were mistaken, you are trying to say that because I asked for evidence (which I said I ask for)...I am being contradictory.
Your entire thesis is laughable...but you are so tied up in your unwillingness to stand up like a man and own up to a mistake...you cannot enjoy the laugh with me.
Too bad that.