42
   

Snowdon is a dummy

 
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 24 Dec, 2013 10:36 am
@Frank Apisa,
Merry Christmas, Walter.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 24 Dec, 2013 07:46 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
oralloy wrote:
No, there was no harm from the spying. The spying was completely legitimate.

State to state spying is however not the massive spying that is not legitimate.

That is incorrect. Considering the threat posed by groups like al-Qa'ida, it is reasonable to conduct searches to try to detect such groups before they can attack us.
BillRM
 
  1  
Tue 24 Dec, 2013 08:59 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
That is incorrect. Considering the threat posed by groups like al-Qa'ida, it is reasonable to conduct searches to try to detect such groups before they can attack us.


You mean by recording all my snail mail and email and internet web surfing and phone calls along with most to the planet is going to be useful!!!!!!!!

Even with super computers all you are doing is burying the people you should be looking at in a pile of completely innocent communications/information.

As it was in such attacks as 911 the information was there just bury in far far less information then we are collecting now.

You are aiding the terrorists by wasting so must resources in a capture everything programs.

All those phone records had not aid the stopping of one repeat one terrorist attack since it was begin for example.

Useful in blackmailing a senator or two for having affairs straight or gay or such however to made sure they vote the way your wish them to vote.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Tue 24 Dec, 2013 09:36 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
oralloy wrote:
That is incorrect. Considering the threat posed by groups like al-Qa'ida, it is reasonable to conduct searches to try to detect such groups before they can attack us.

You mean by recording all my snail mail and email and internet web surfing and phone calls along with most to the planet is going to be useful!!!!!!!!

No, I mean by recording data showing who you called, when you called, and for how long you called. So if they suspect that there is a network of suspicious people, they can see if those people are calling each other, and see who else they've been calling.


BillRM wrote:
Even with super computers all you are doing is burying the people you should be looking at in a pile of completely innocent communications/information.

I expect that supercomputers are able to handle the task filtering through all the phone records.


BillRM wrote:
You are aiding the terrorists by wasting so must resources in a capture everything programs.

I don't see it as a waste. And I doubt the resources are all that daunting.


BillRM wrote:
All those phone records had not aid the stopping of one repeat one terrorist attack since it was begin for example.

We don't know that is the case. Since Snowden managed to damage the program so gravely that it is no longer of any use in fighting terrorism, it is clearly being spun as the sacrificial lamb that will be canceled. Just because it is being spun as useless doesn't mean it really was.

And maybe the big terrorist attack that it would have stopped is one that is still in the future.


BillRM wrote:
Useful in blackmailing a senator or two for having affairs straight or gay or such however to made sure they vote the way your wish them to vote.

The NSA isn't blackmailing any senators.
BillRM
 
  1  
Tue 24 Dec, 2013 09:44 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
We don't know that is the case. Since Snowden managed to damage the program so gravely that it is no longer of any use in fighting terrorism, it is clearly being spun as the sacrificial lamb that will be canceled. Just because it is being spun as useless doesn't mean it really was.


You mean a man appointed by our president would lied to the American people in a manner that make the administration look worst!!!!!!!

Quote:
No, I mean by recording data showing who you called, when you called, and for how long you called. So if they suspect that there is a network of suspicious people, they can see if those people are calling each other, and see who else they've been calling.


They can also do a Hoover and find all kind of materials to be able to blackmail house and senator members. We already have cases of NSA/CIA employees using this information to check up wives/girlfriends.

Next good luck in being able to do the kind of tracking on terrorists that are not brain dead.

Hell if I was up to no good I would used tor and remailers and throw away phones and do dead drops using newsgroups and so on.

Good luck in being able to track me it I have any real concerns over you tracking me.

All you doing is getting information on innocent people.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Tue 24 Dec, 2013 09:58 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
You mean a man appointed by our president would lied to the American people in a manner that make the administration look worst!!!!!!!

I don't perceive any negative portrayal of the Obama Administration.


BillRM wrote:
They can also do a Hoover and find all kind of materials to be able to blackmail house and senator members.

I am confident that the NSA is not blackmailing any American politicians.
BillRM
 
  1  
Tue 24 Dec, 2013 10:04 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
I am confident that the NSA is not blackmailing any American politicians.


Given the history of the FBI under Hoover why are you confident of any such thing?

Have human nature change since Hoover blackmail Presidents and congress members?

You do know that the reason that being the head of the FBI is now limited to ten years is so no one else can get into a position of power similar to Hoover.

Of course with the resources we are pumping into the intelligence community it would not take ten years.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Tue 24 Dec, 2013 11:02 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
Given the history of the FBI under Hoover why are you confident of any such thing?

Have human nature change since Hoover blackmail Presidents and congress members?

every single part of government that we know about constantly presses for partisan political advantage, so to assume that the parts we dont know about somehow would resist the urge is stupidity.

but americans tend to be badly educated stupid people, so why should we expect any intelligence here?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Wed 25 Dec, 2013 06:06 am
Snowden on Channel 4 's "The Alternative Christmas Message will be broadcast at 4:15pm on today ... but can be watched (at least partly?) already here:


0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Wed 25 Dec, 2013 11:13 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
That is incorrect. Considering the threat posed by groups like al-Qa'ida, it is reasonable to conduct searches to try to detect such groups before they can attack us.


You mean by recording all my snail mail and email and internet web surfing and phone calls along with most to the planet is going to be useful!!!!!!!!

Even with super computers all you are doing is burying the people you should be looking at in a pile of completely innocent communications/information.

As it was in such attacks as 911 the information was there just bury in far far less information then we are collecting now.

You are aiding the terrorists by wasting so must resources in a capture everything programs.

All those phone records had not aid the stopping of one repeat one terrorist attack since it was begin for example.

Useful in blackmailing a senator or two for having affairs straight or gay or such however to made sure they vote the way your wish them to vote.


No, Bill...they should not be doing that. They should only check on people they know mean us harm!
!!!!!!!!!!
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Wed 25 Dec, 2013 11:33 am
@Frank Apisa,
You,
Quote:
No, Bill...they should not be doing that. They should only check on people they know mean us harm!
!!!!!!!!!!


I think I see a crack in the wall!
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 25 Dec, 2013 12:33 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
No, Bill...they should not be doing that. They should only check on people they know mean us harm!
!!!!!!!!!!


Sure Frank and on the other hand the police should be able to search every home in the nation looking for criminal misdeeds as after all why do we need probable cause as we are going to miss criminals if we only focus of people that we have reasons to think might had broken the law.

What a god awful country you wish to live without all the freedoms the nation was foundered with and all to deal with a few terrorists and the minor threat they happen to be to all of us. Nothing at all compare to having a thousand nuclear weapons aims at our centers of populations for forty years or so.

Kind of remind me of the House un-american activities committee of the 1950s and even as a child I can remember upsetting my father by stating the only thing un-american was the committee itself.
spendius
 
  1  
Wed 25 Dec, 2013 12:36 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
I think I see a crack in the wall!


It's a chimera ci. A will-o'-the-wisp.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Wed 25 Dec, 2013 12:39 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
No, Bill...they should not be doing that. They should only check on people they know mean us harm!
!!!!!!!!!!


Sure Frank and on the other hand the police should be able to search every home in the nation looking for criminal misdeeds as after all why do we need probable cause as we are going to miss criminals if we only focus of people that we have reasons to think might had broken the law.

What a god awful world you wish to live in all to deal with a few terrorists and the minor threat they happen to be to all of us.


No, really, Bill...I can your point.

The intelligence services should just spy on people they know are going to attack us...and leave everyone else alone.

Jeez! I wonder why they cannot see the genius of your solution.
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 25 Dec, 2013 12:50 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
The intelligence services should just spy on people they know are going to attack us...and leave everyone else alone.


The intelligence services should not try to act as a all knowing god and try to monitor all of us and instead focus on somewhat likely threats.

Such a government as you claims is needed to deal with a few men with box cutters or pressure cookers bombs is far more evil then the terrorists.

A police state is not safer then a free society nor can it claim any loyally of any kind from it citizens.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Wed 25 Dec, 2013 12:51 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
The intelligence services should just spy on people they know are going to attack us...and leave everyone else alone.


The intelligence services should not try to act as a all knowing god and try to monitor all of us and instead focus on somewhat likely threats.

Such a government as you claims is needed to deal with a few men with box cutters or pressure cookers bombs is far more evil then the terrorists.


Right. That's what I said.

They should limit themselves only to people they know mean to harm us.

Rolling Eyes
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Wed 25 Dec, 2013 12:53 pm
@BillRM,
Also, the fact of life is that there will always be individuals, including US citizens, who will do bastardly things against our children without any fore-warning.

Mass collection of communication data isn't going to catch them.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 25 Dec, 2013 12:56 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
They should limit themselves only to people they know mean to harm us.


Or have some minor likelihood of being a threat to the nation not everyone in the damn country.

Of course if you do get a police state then more and more people will indeed become a threat to that state as no one love or have any loyalty to that state not even the rulers themselves.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Wed 25 Dec, 2013 12:59 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
They should limit themselves only to people they know mean to harm us.


Or have some minor likelihood of being a threat to the nation not everyone in the damn country.

Of course if you do get a police state when more and more people will indeed become a threat to that state as no one love or have any loyalty to that state not even the rulers themselves.


Right...they should limit themselves to monitoring people they are reasonably sure mean to harm us...and leave everyone else alone.

Drunk
BillRM
 
  2  
Wed 25 Dec, 2013 01:13 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
Right...they should limit themselves to monitoring people


No they should monitor everyone who are living on the damn planet and the few that are off the planet for that matter.

Tell you what if you got your wish you would indeed need to monitor everyone as you would had created a far far greater threat to the state then a few terrorists you started with.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Snowdon is a dummy
  3. » Page 209
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/14/2025 at 09:16:26