42
   

Snowdon is a dummy

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 01:37 pm
@BillRM,
You,
Quote:
LOL so you think that with somewhere of a total workforce of 800,000 you could keep that kind of secret forever?


I'm not sure where you got that number, but that looks more like the country of a "police state" than a democracy! LOL Mr. Green
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 01:37 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
Tell me, Bill...is the harm being caused because the US spied...or because some misguided individual decided on his own to tell the world about the spying?


LOL so you think that with somewhere of a total workforce of 800,000 you could keep that kind of secret forever?


Did I say that???

Where?

Quote:
If not someone working for either the companies or NSA directly or indirectly did not spill the beans others was likely to find those backdoors independently.

If the persons who find those build in weaknesses are bad guys god know how must harm they could do to the world banking systems before they in turn are found out.

When you get American companies to put backdoors/weaknesses in their customers security software/hardware you are the one putting those firms at risk not Snowdon.


Perhaps you did not understand the question, Bill. Let me make it clearer for you:



Tell me, Bill...is the harm being caused because the US spied...or because some misguided individual decided on his own to tell the world about the spying?

Hope that's better.
Olivier5
 
  1  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 02:14 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Both, I guess. There wouldn't be anything to report if the spying hadn't happened in the first place.
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 02:15 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
I'm not sure where you got that number, but that looks more like the country of a "police state" than a democracy! LOL Mr. Green
That's the number of all directly or indirectly associated with the NSA (like contractors and subcontractors), all with top security clearance.

However, all those data are classified ... and 800,000 really is the highest number what some think (sic!).
The NSA itself has about 40,000 employees. (Including "over 960 Ph.D.s, over 4,000 computer scientists, over a thousand mathematicians" according to Gen. Keith Alexander)
BillRM
 
  2  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 02:19 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
Tell me, Bill...is the harm being caused because the US spied...or because some misguided individual decided on his own to tell the world about the spying?


Not even a little bit once more it is the US government that got American companies to screw their customers and to a lesser degree the the companies that was willing to break faith with those customers in one known case for ten millions dollars.

The reporter of misdeeds is not responsible for the bad things that flow out of those misdeeds becoming public knowledge.

Not everyone had the guts to shut down their companies before breaking faith with their customers in secret like Ladar Lavabit did stating:

Quote:
Lavabit announced today that it would shut down its encrypted email service rather than “become complicit in crimes against the American people.” Lavabit did not say what it had been asked to do, only that it was legally prohibited from sharing the events leading to its decision.
BillRM
 
  2  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 02:21 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
he NSA itself has about 40,000 employees. (Including "over 960 Ph.D.s, over 4,000 computer scientists, over a thousand mathematicians" according to Gen. Keith Alexander)


An that is a small percent of the total work force with many key functions being outsources to private firms.

With more of the total budget going to those firms then go directly to the NSA.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  -1  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 02:45 pm
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:

Both, I guess. There wouldn't be anything to report if the spying hadn't happened in the first place.


If the spying had gone on without the discloser...the spying would still be going on and the problem Bill is concerned about would not be a problem.

The disclosure is the cause of the problems Bill is concerned about. Frankly, I think mostly he is worried about the sky falling. People have been spying on each other since biblical times (at least)...and the disclosures set off a media frenzy.

Nothing happening here, folks...just move on.
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 02:49 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
Tell me, Bill...is the harm being caused because the US spied...or because some misguided individual decided on his own to tell the world about the spying?


Not even a little bit once more it is the US government that got American companies to screw their customers and to a lesser degree the the companies that was willing to break faith with those customers in one known case for ten millions dollars.


Sometimes I cannot even decipher your posts any more, Bill. This paragraph is one of those times. If you want to decipher it for me...I'll try to respond.

Quote:
The reporter of misdeeds is not responsible for the bad things that flow out of those misdeeds becoming public knowledge.


Okay...but if the "reporting" had not been done...the stuff you are stewing over would not be happening.

Quote:
Not everyone had the guts to shut down their companies before breaking faith with their customers in secret like Ladar Lavabit did stating:

Quote:
Lavabit announced today that it would shut down its encrypted email service rather than “become complicit in crimes against the American people.” Lavabit did not say what it had been asked to do, only that it was legally prohibited from sharing the events leading to its decision.



Really. Well congratulation to them.

But back to the question:

Is the harm being caused because the US spied...or because some misguided individual decided on his own to tell the world about the spying?


I wish I could make it bigger for you, Bill...but the font sizes apparently will not increase beyond this. But even you should be able to read the question.

Got an answer?
JPB
 
  5  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 02:52 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:


Tell me, Bill...is the harm being caused because the US spied...or because some misguided individual decided on his own to tell the world about the spying?


Define harm.

The harm To Me is the harm caused by my own government against my belief of everything I thought this country stood for. To the people of NYC, which you and MIT clearly fall under, the harm is the potential prevention of another attack. To all of us, the "terrorists" have already won. What remains to be seen is how much of what we stand for can be recaptured.

Edit: your inclusion of the word "misguided" clearly indicates that you think there's only one right answer.
BillRM
 
  2  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 02:55 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
Is the harm being caused because the US spied...or because some misguided individual decided on his own to tell the world about the spying?


An the answer once more is hell no for the reasons already given.

I
JPB
 
  3  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 03:06 pm
What I think is "Hell" is the reality of war that was brought to our shores. Do I embrace preventing more of that? Of course. Do I embrace killing tens and hundreds of thousands of people in other lands while at the same time allowing our government to usurp the freedoms guaranteed under our constitution to our people? Hell, no.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  3  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 03:06 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
If the spying had gone on without the discloser...the spying would still be going on and the problem Bill is concerned about would not be a problem.

Somebody else could have reported it, given the size of this operation and how poorly it appears to be managed.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 03:10 pm
@Olivier5,
How any organization can believe they can control 800,000 workers and billions of every sort of communication every day is beyond any hope of common sense. They never considered cost/benefit, efficiency, or the illegality of their accumulation of private communications.

It proves that our government are run by idiots.

TNCFS
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 03:15 pm
@JPB,
JPB wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:


Tell me, Bill...is the harm being caused because the US spied...or because some misguided individual decided on his own to tell the world about the spying?


Define harm.


Ask Bill. He is the one who used the word to describe the situation which troubles him.

I am using it only to respond to what he is asking and discussing.

Quote:
The harm To Me is the harm caused by my own government against my belief of everything I thought this country stood for. To the people of NYC, which you and MIT clearly fall under, the harm is the potential prevention of another attack. To all of us, the "terrorists" have already won. What remains to be seen is how much of what we stand for can be recaptured.


Okay...and I have acknowledged and indicated appreciation for people like you and the sentiments you express. I have done that several times so far.

Quote:
Edit: your inclusion of the word "misguided" clearly indicates that you think there's only one right answer.



My use of the word "misguided" ought to indicate my personal perspective, JPB...NOT that I think there is only one right answer.

I HAVE INDICATED ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RESPECT for the take of others on this issue. That kind of thing has not been returned by anyone. In fact, I have been called naive, stupid, short-sighted, and a couple of other gems for daring to have an opinion different from some of these guys.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 03:17 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
Is the harm being caused because the US spied...or because some misguided individual decided on his own to tell the world about the spying?


An the answer once more is hell no for the reasons already given.

I


The answer "hell no" makes no sense considering the question. It is an either/or...for anyone who can read English.

Give it another shot.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 03:18 pm
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:

Quote:
If the spying had gone on without the discloser...the spying would still be going on and the problem Bill is concerned about would not be a problem.

Somebody else could have reported it, given the size of this operation and how poorly it appears to be managed.


Somebody else indeed COULD HAVE. But one guy did. And my question holds.
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 03:20 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

How any organization can believe they can control 800,000 workers and billions of every sort of communication every day is beyond any hope of common sense. They never considered cost/benefit, efficiency, or the illegality of their accumulation of private communications.

It proves that our government are run by idiots.

TNCFS


WE, for the most part, ci, run our government. We are the government. There are workers in government who are incompetent. But there are workers in the private sector who are every bit as incompetent.

Humans man the jobs that you are saying are being handled by idiots.
BillRM
 
  1  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 03:21 pm
@Frank Apisa,
My my Frank when the government begin to play those kinds of games on the scale they did they knew or should had known that the odds of the programs becoming public knowledge approach 100 percents as a limit.

It is their fault and no one else for what is happening.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 03:24 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

My my Frank when the government begin to play those kinds of games on the scale they did they knew or should had known that the odds of the programs becoming public knowledge approach 100 percents as a limit.

It is their fault and no one else for what is happening.


Well...since WE are the government...it is OUR fault.

I think you should hang your head in shame for being a part of it.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Mon 23 Dec, 2013 03:37 pm
@Frank Apisa,
You,
Quote:
Well...since WE are the government...it is OUR fault.


You may believe what you wish about our government's actions, but I do not approve of many things they do in my name. I won't bother listing those out for you, but the Iraq war is one of the major ones that happened with our president before Obama. I also disagree with many actions Obama has taken during his presidency.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Snowdon is a dummy
  3. » Page 206
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/15/2025 at 04:12:28