42
   

Snowdon is a dummy

 
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 10:33 am
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:

Nice damage control work, but who would be foolish enough to believe that Obama was not informed? More likely, he was THE PRIME CLIENT for such spying on his counterparts. Who wants to listen to a president/chancellor/PM, more than another president/chancellor/PM?

or believe an Obama promise to not misbehave again? there needs to be consequences as well as monitoring put in place, the legal controls of the NSA are not even close to being good enough.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  3  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 10:44 am
@BillRM,
I know Bill, have been writing posts about that over the past few days/weeks. We need to built networks that the US can't break, and start sending all sorts of disinformation over the channels they can break.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 10:49 am
Interesting. At first I thought it was my computer continuing its general elderly breakdown (you know, the times I get a flibbity cursor and then a giant white space when I post, sometimes followed by warning bells; or this week, failure to pull up some links when I have another window or two open) but no. When I tried to get to the link that JPB posted on page 163 (thank you for that link, JPB), after wheels spinning for a while, I got this message from google:

The requested URL /http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131017/18381624923/dianne-feinsteins-bragging-about-nsa-surveillance-program-may-finally-result-it-being-declared-unconstitutional.shtml was not found on this server. That’s all we know.
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 10:55 am
This authoritarianism is the result of the pursuit by the US and much of the West of a failed foreign policy that is based on the early 21st century ideology of regime change, and its attendant contingency planning which sees such things as precision targeting of insurgents that is anything but precise, slaughtering many innocent men, women and children which are written off as “collateral damage”; and also which includes the propping of repressive governments in the name of religious and ethnocentric ends.

My question is, is this clusterfuck worth it?
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 11:00 am
@InfraBlue,
look at how regime change has worked out in Libya and Egypt. The West was much better off before.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 11:23 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
Say bye bye to your democracy then. Once the NSA can blackmail any potential leader or politician into submission, why even bother voting?


I only ever voted once. I thought I ought to try it. I usually bet on elections and on who I think excites the female suffrage best.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 11:42 am
We don't have to whine and lament about what the American did, says a French minister - we have to be better:
French trade minister: France must beat U.S. at economic intelligence
Quote:
France must get better than the United States at economic intelligence rather than whining about U.S. phone tapping, which is no reason to suspend EU trade talks with Washington, its trade minister told Reuters on Tuesday.

Reports that the U.S. National Security Agency extensively intercepted its European allies' phone calls and emails including France and Germany have caused a diplomatic uproar.

Asked about the scandal, Trade Minister Nicole Bricq said the lesson was for Paris to improve its own economic intelligence gathering.

"Economic intelligence exists. There's no point in whining. I think we should be doing better, be better organized," Bricq told a Reuters Newsmaker briefing on Tuesday.
JPB
 
  1  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 11:48 am
@ossobuco,
The link works for me. Try this
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131017/18381624923/dianne-feinsteins-bragging-about-nsa-surveillance-program-may-finally-result-it-being-declared-unconstitutional.shtml
BillRM
 
  3  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 11:50 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
I know Bill, have been writing posts about that over the past few days/weeks. We need to built networks that the US can't break, and start sending all sorts of disinformation over the channels they can break.


Well the tor darknet is a good beginning as direct attacks by even the NSA seems not all that fruitful to them and such side channel attacks such as browsers vulnerabilities can be deal with.

All SSL connections should use perfect forward security and not the websites public keys that the US had and can demand to be turn over to them.

Cloud storage firms should be move to nations with firm privacy laws and no secret courts and only the customers should hold the encrypted keys to their own information.

An on and on........at least the US government is going to be aiding the development of internet firms off shore of the US and such nations as the UK and Canada.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  4  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 12:07 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Indeed that's the general tone in many French commentators: "Merkel is throwing a tantrum; let's just try and beat the US at their own game, cause they will never stop it anyway."

I don't know that this is a useful attitude, in spite of its professed pragmatism... Evidently we have secret services too, and not the lamest, who are interested in keeping on with business as usual or even raising their budget... And I do think the US can be beaten (they have made many mistakes evidently, and will keep making them), but I personally feel very cross at mass surveillance and hate to see anything that justifies it.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 12:09 pm
@Olivier5,
Olivier5 wrote:

Quote:
My opinion is that personal privacy is on its way out.

Say bye bye to your democracy then. Once the NSA can blackmail any potential leader or politician into submission, why even bother voting?


If you think that because personal privacy is becoming a scarce commodity...that means that democracy is destroyed...well...just think that.

I do not see the connection.

In any case, the way things seem to be going, the amount of privacy you have today is less than you had yesterday...and tomorrow you will have less. Fight it if you feel like tilting windmills.

Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 12:10 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
My opinion is that personal privacy is on its way out. Our technological evolution is such that expectations of personal privacy on a level we have previously enjoyed is little more than wishful thinking.


An you are an expert on the internet and computer/internet security I assume?


No I am not. Am I not allowed in your world to have an opinion unless I am?

Quote:


You are up on such subjects as perfect forward security or the encrypted standards being now build into IP6 or VPNs or pgp or.........?


Bill...if you cannot see the handwriting on the wall...I cannot help you. Encrypt to your heart's content.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 12:14 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:
5) My personal privacy is NOT an important thing to ME. I post under my own real name…and frequently share opinions under my real name in newspapers and magazines.
I post under my real name, I write letters and share opinions in newspapers as well.
But: I have decided to do so under my real name (and if I wouldn't, letters wouldn't be posted/printed).
However, I want to share the content of my emails, phone calls, letters etc only with those with I want them to share.

Personal privacy was one of the main factors, why people in the former GDR liked to get unified with "the other Germany". We still have an upper-level federal agency, where everyone can look at what the Stasi knew about her/him or wanted to know ... still 34,762 times in the first half of this year (6,837,620 times since 1991) Germans did so.


Fine, Walter...you can have that opinion.

Is there some reason why I cannot have mine?

I do not care about my personal privacy...and I am of the opinion that a great deal of personal privacy is on its way out. I...as an individual...am not concerned with that.

If you want to know what porn sites I visit...or if I have occasional stains in my underwear...you are welcome to that information. There is not an email I write that I hold so personal that it would matter TO ME if it was discovered.

My personal opinion is that it just does not matter.

So???
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 12:35 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:
Fine, Walter...you can have that opinion.

Is there some reason why I cannot have mine?

I do not care about my personal privacy...and I am of the opinion that a great deal of personal privacy is on its way out. I...as an individual...am not concerned with that.

Certainly you can have your opinion. (And 'thanks' that I can have mine.)

I do care about my privacy in so far that it is me who decides with whom I want to share. And if I want to share it. What part of it I want to share.

I do think, too, that spying/espionage can be very useful. For various purposes.
I don't think that spying on friends is any good - it's at least the beginning of the end of a friendship in my opinion.

Yesterday, I've met a retired US-officer, who was in charge of army's spaying in Berlin (and before in Frankfurt) for a couple of years. And since we were together all day, we didn't just talk about the weather and beautiful Rhine valley. Very interesting. A period a bit like in John le Carré's The Spy Who Came in from the Cold, but never against friends and allies, he said ...
BillRM
 
  2  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 12:36 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
Bill...if you cannot see the handwriting on the wall...I cannot help you. Encrypt to your heart's content.


LOL I do indeed encrypted to my heart content as for example when passing financial information by email with family members.

Footnote there is a nice open source/free program call locknote that combine a notepad type program with AES 256 encryption build in for text files.

https://www.steganos.com/us/products/for-free/locknote/overview/

Lot simpler to use and attached this program as a file to email then used the more powerful pgp software with special note when your are dealing with people with little computer skills or ability to set up pgp.

I also keep my master password file on both skydive and a memory stick on my car keychain using locknote.

You are limited to text files only so in keeping things like my family passports jpg images you need to employed a truecrypt volume or a 7-zip file.

Of course I also have my netbooks protected with truecrypt so if I am one of the millions of people who do loss their computers when traveling every year I do not need to worry about someone being able to access my privacy information on the computer.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 12:44 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:
Fine, Walter...you can have that opinion.

Is there some reason why I cannot have mine?

I do not care about my personal privacy...and I am of the opinion that a great deal of personal privacy is on its way out. I...as an individual...am not concerned with that.

Certainly you can have your opinion. (And 'thanks' that I can have mine.)

I do care about my privacy in so far that it is me who decides with whom I want to share. And if I want to share it. What part of it I want to share.

I do think, too, that spying/espionage can be very useful. For various purposes.
I don't think that spying on friends is any good - it's at least the beginning of the end of a friendship in my opinion.

Yesterday, I've met a retired US-officer, who was in charge of army's spaying in Berlin (and before in Frankfurt) for a couple of years. And since we were together all day, we didn't just talk about the weather and beautiful Rhine valley. Very interesting. A period a bit like in John le Carré's The Spy Who Came in from the Cold, but never against friends and allies, he said ...


Well...apparently there are some people who think one cannot accurately tell who is a friend without checking out some things.

I don't agree with it...I am as put off by the spying on allies as most people here. But I do not know the motivation...and I am unwilling to accept some of the stuff being peddled here.

There certainly are plenty of people who think Obama should not be trusted. Maybe there are people who think Merkel shouldn't be trusted...and are checking her out. Maybe there are people checking Obama out.

MY OPINION: Anything you want to keep secret...let only you know about it. Once two people know a thing...it is no longer a secret. Then it becomes a question of how many people are in on it.

Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 12:47 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
Bill...if you cannot see the handwriting on the wall...I cannot help you. Encrypt to your heart's content.


LOL I do indeed encrypted to my heart content as for example when passing financial information by email with family members.

Footnote there is a nice open source/free program call locknote that combine a notepad type program with AES 256 encryption build in for text files.

https://www.steganos.com/us/products/for-free/locknote/overview/

Lot simpler to use and attached this program as a file to email then used the more powerful pgp software with special note when your are dealing with people with little computer skills or ability to set up pgp.

I also keep my master password file on both skydive and a memory stick on my car keychain using locknote.

You are limited to text files only so in keeping things like my family passports jpg images you need to employed a truecrypt volume or a 7-zip file.

Of course I also have my netbooks protected with truecrypt so if I am one of the millions of people who do loss their computers when traveling every year I do not need to worry about someone being able to access my privacy information on the computer.


I get that Bill...and I actually envy your facility with all this stuff. But the truth is that I have not written a single email...not a single sentence...that I worry about someone discovering. I don't talk behind people's back...or carry gossip.

Luckily (or unluckily from some perspectives) my total fortune is so small...only an idiot would steal it. And if they did, I could recoup it within a week.

So no matter how difficult it is to accept...FOR ME...I do not care about the privacy thing.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 12:54 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:
Well...apparently there are some people who think one cannot accurately tell who is a friend without checking out some things.
Even with such I could agree - at least in the field of politics.
But 11 years monitoring the cell phone seems a bit long.
And wanting to know how many of some country's inhabitants are really friends seem to be a bit like ... a job creation scheme to call it more positively.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 01:00 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:
Well...apparently there are some people who think one cannot accurately tell who is a friend without checking out some things.
Even with such I could agree - at least in the field of politics.
But 11 years monitoring the cell phone seems a bit long.
And wanting to know how many of some country's inhabitants are really friends seem to be a bit like ... a job creation scheme to call it more positively.


Yer right, Walter. I'm just putting out some ideas on the other side of this coin.

Lots of crap going on...and we (Americans) are doing some stuff I never thought would be done.

BUT...there was a day when I would have bet huge bucks that the World Trade Center would never be brought down the way it was.

Things have changed...and the toothpaste is out of the tube. It simply is never going back in...and the question we ought be wrestling with should not be how to get it back in...but rather how to deal with the fact that it is out.

I think that coming to the realization of the changes is the first step in that direction.

ASIDE: There are lots of negative aspects of this loss of privacy. We should not lose sight of the fact that there are plenty of positives also.
BillRM
 
  3  
Tue 29 Oct, 2013 01:07 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
We should not lose sight of the fact that there are plenty of positives also.


BULLSHIT...........
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Snowdon is a dummy
  3. » Page 167
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 08/08/2025 at 10:17:00