@farmerman,
It is self-evidently what you do from you having done it but it seems a trifle forced from it having been done simply for the doing it's sake.
There was no attempt to answer the question which related to any sacrifice Mr Springsteen might be called upon to make in order to dedicate one of his gigs to the hero of this thread who seems, from what little I know, his being dead before I heard of him, to have specialised in pandering to that audience which is drawn towards ruthless, predatory violence and a mawkish, sentimentality sufficiently squishy to curl the toes of any jaded intellectual.
Perhaps you are an admirer of Mr Springsteen and are uneasy, possibly upset, at any hints that he might be dedicating his show to the deceased in the service of personal aggrandizement.
My question had nothing to do with myself or Mr Dylan.
* Doesn't that "z" look so vulgar? It jars the literary sensibility of one with such a delicate aesthetic as I own to. It is not unlike a turd on a freshly laundered tablecloth.
It has struck me before that it was originally a typo due to "s" and "z" being in such close proximity on the keyboard, became a fad in elegant circles, and finally established as the finished form.
I always study typos for a few moments before correcting them, as I know you do and with such charming results.
I was once writing to the Feature's Editor of a respected newspaper regarding the heavily subjective bias she was presiding over in relation to the intercourse between the sexes and I typed "feeture" instead of "feature" by mistake. Looking at this typo I realised that "ture" and "chewer" were close homonyms. In a flash I had "feechewer" which I have used ever since for happenings which are only happening because fees are being chewed. Which covers a wide space of ground.
I sometimes use "feech" if I'm feeling fancifully flippant.