@JLNobody,
I can see your point there...and it is a great point...I think...and I think that that is a great way of putting "the Golden Rule" into positive, encouraging, compassionate, reinforcing, genuine perspectives...where the emphasis is always upon compassion, and what I would consider any "virtue"
I would have to say that I do think that when Jesus had brought forth the "Golden Rule" I do think he meant it in a compassionate way...And in a very sincere, dedicated, merciful, prominent, booming, but genuine way...So that the Apostles knew he meant business...but not necessarily in a punishment kind of way...like many may think...But as in he expected the Apostles to live by this...
And even though I do see the value in the way that you have expressed how you actually apply the same thing but into different terms, for optimism...
I do think that it is also important to acknowledge the sincerity factor behind the rule itself...because I think if there is no emphasis on how booming this rule should be echoed...(in any different, applicable terms) then I think the rule itself may even lose its value a bit...because then I am not even sure if one is able to distinguish why one is even as compassionate as they truly are and why...Or would be able to fully articulate how they can actually begin to apply this to their own lifestyle themselves...to begin to become more endowed...and even teach others who are willing to learn...
And I am no expert in Buddhism at all...but I think I do understand how a Buddhist says that one can come to root understandings of this compassion when they meditate...and are able to become selfless, free, and apart of everything as one...but I would have to say from the outside looking in that I would think it would be important with this compassion or virtuous nature that one gains access to once they begin to let go, to also help another on their own path...if one thinks that they can...and that is where I see the dedication, and sincerity factor to be of good use...
I apologize to you directly if I have misrepresented how you may personally explain, or how you may personally "see" yourself as "just to be" and "be free" from an actual Buddhist perspective...
I mean no disrespect...