@aidan,
Quote:If we adopt that as an operative criterion
for use of words, then we can end up with many extra ta s,
depending upon the uncertainties of personal taste.
aidan wrote:
Quote:Don't forget the small fact that it's a recognized and accepted form of the word (since 1630)
that I'm choosing to use David - I haven't created it on my own out of whole cloth.
I take the vu that the 2nd form is simply an inaccuracy --
a corruption of the first.
Quote:Maybe; I don 't recognize those words.
aidan wrote:
Quote:They're places - in America we'd say: CheltenHAM and ChippenHAM-
I like the way they say them better.
As long as the pronunciation bears fidelity to the spelling.
Quote:
I believe that I have him on Ignore
for being mentally devoid of value.
aidan wrote:
Quote:Mentally devoid of value David?
Come on- he's extremely articulate and well versed in his field of expertise.
I have to say I'm surprised to hear you say something like that,
because you don't agree with what he says.
You used to be such a free spirit- live and let live sort of guy- what happened?
If this is the guy that I 'm thinking of,
I acted in furtherance of my right of self-defense.
He was driving me nuts with drivel for too long.
He shocked my brain too many times with naked attacks against logic.
He denied that the word
NOT has any meaning.
My patience with him was not infinite. I suspected that he was trolling me.
like arguing with Gracie Allen
Quote:Yeah; anyone is free to say that 3 + 3 = 7
aidan wrote:
Quote:Yeah, unless it's a math test and you care about your grade.
Anyone is still free to say it.
I don t recommend it.