Does God Exist?

@Romeo Fabulini,

That quote might be read to mean that a wife is a female person who is being shagged by a bloke without any artificial contrivances to render the event androgynous.

Serial monogamy. Which is what divorce leads to. In Brave New World Huxley took it to its obvious conclusion.

The concept of "wife" is very flexible unless it is exclusive and permanent.

0 Replies

@Romeo Fabulini,

Romeo Fabulini wrote:

So if I meet a nice JW lady would she be allowed to marry me even though I'm not a JW?

She can marry anyone she wants whether its a good idea or not.

0 Replies

@RexRed,

RexRed wrote:

The Bible backs same-sex couples:

Sure.

It's just the homosexual activity that's wrong.

It's even wrong among male female relations. Did you know that?

2 Replies

@neologist,

neologist wrote:

It's even wrong among male female relations. Did you know that?

Perhaps you mean women at the age above 50s that are gay-extrasenses. Such women should be burned profilactically ... as the witches in the Middle Ages.
Actually any adult sex that can eventually cause diabetes, cancer, MS, etc. (no matter same sex or not) cannot be right in any interporetation of the word.
Money, power & sex are especially dangerous combination. The greatest freaks are the homofobians, who claim that they are not exactly gays but are practicing gay-extrasense activities 24/7 ... with the aim to protect the other people from the dangerious gays. WFM.

0 Replies

@neologist,

neologist wrote:

RexRed wrote:
The Bible backs same-sex couples:
Sure.

It's just the homosexual activity that's wrong.

It's even wrong among male female relations. Did you know that?

I don't care and I disagree Neo, gay sex is no more sinful than hetero sex.

Most hetero sex does not result in offspring either.

After all God hates sex, that is why he forbid Adam and Eve to do it.

This is all just stupid...

3 Replies

@RexRed,

Homophobics can't see themselves, because it seems like common knowledge that over 50% of heterosexual marriages end up in divorce.

So why are heterosexuals so engrossed with homosexuals? Even if heterosexuals don't divorce at the 50% rate, they still need to worry more about themselves than other people's love life.

So, it would seem.

1 Reply

@RexRed,

RexRed wrote:

After all God hates sex, that is why he forbid Adam and Eve to do it.

Where did you get that idea?

0 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

It sounds like you've never met a heterophobic ci. They have a contempt for women you would not believe. Lesbians will more readily express contempt for men because it is not as socially unacceptable as men expressing contempt for women as a few men occasionally will.

Many are the ways for men to express their contempt for men and the better they do it the better I like it. It was easy to see that Benny Hill had not a single homosexual bone in his body. That's why he got fired. He was considered unsuitable in our increasingly androgynous world. PSB wouldn't dare show Laurel and Hardy movies these days.

Farce is basically expressing contempt for men without any blood flowing. Making them look utterly ridiculous. Like in the most popular soap-operas only in those it is much more insidious than in the Carry On series. That's why they go on forever. There is no catastrophe as there is in farce.

I'm using "catastrophe" in the theatrical sense. Farces have neat endings.

1 Reply

@RexRed,

Quote:

After all God hates sex, that is why he forbid Adam and Eve to do it.

You have it all wrong Rex. You will read the Bible literally won't you?

God knew they couldn't keep their hands off each other with nothing to do in a scented garden. God had fixed it that way. He wanted an excuse to throw them out so that just like all the creatures in evolution He wanted to cover the earth with his most perfect yet creation. Eve I mean.

When Adam so yearned for a helpmeet it is obvious the God would have asked him how he would like it to be. And there you are. Walking by you in the street. Every one a daughter of Eve.

As daughters of monkeys, or things lower down on Darwin's Tree, they can hardly look dignified. So we start with Eve. Adam's choice. Gave up a rib for it. His Achilles Heel.

A makeover sort of thing. To put us to work on the mission when everybody knows how lazy men are when left to their own devices. That's why the Noah story is so funny.

How do you think we are doing? Exterminating everything else except what we can turn to account.

1 Reply

@spendius,

You,

Quote:

It sounds like you've never met a heterophobic ci. They have a contempt for women you would not believe.

Oh, I've met plenty; they're called conservatives or the GOP. Their contempt for women is universally known. What I don't understand is why women belong to that party!

I know they love their wives and daughters. They don't respect them, and I just don't understand why they treat them as second class citizens when they legislate or deny equal rights.

2 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

Quote:

Their contempt for women is universally known.

No it is not. It only looks that way to you because you think you know what women need. You have made a serious accusation against those men based upon your own prejudices. You can't mean universally known because the GOP is half the voters. And about half of them women. And most of the blokes under the cosh. So your "universally known" is plain false.

You have assumed your conclusion before you started and it is wrong.

And I wasn't talking about those people. Didn't I say "as a few men occasionally will". You can't read properly. How is the whole GOP a few who occasionally do that. I was meaning a heterophobic bloke who is as bad as a raving homophobic. They are rare. I have met one and read two or three only. And their logic is hard to refute and the only thing to do is take refuge in aesthetic taste. Which they will say is only conditioned. "In infancy" they then sneer.

So you don't see heterophobia except from lesbians. So you are comparing something you are familiar with with something you're not. And it's best that way. Despite the logical flaw.

The GOP would go out of business if it did the heterophobia I am talking about.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

They might think equal rights for women is a male trick and contrary to women's interests.

0 Replies

@spendius,

as usual you are full of **** as a young duck spends. CI has nailed it> The GOP has taken an anti-female along with anti- science platform since the mid 70's, and they try to reverse their story by committing acts of "preemptive diversion".

1 Reply

@farmerman,

You're making the same mistake fm.

ci. hasn't nailed it one little bit. He has expressed a prejudice. As you have.

You're on A2K. Not Mrs fm. ci. is on A2K. Not Mrs ci.. Lola ended up on the books of a dating agency. She sounded pretty well blasted to me.

It is up your street paying lip service to equal rights for women. Evolution has no explanation for it other than that. There's no unctuous, sloppy virtue in evolution.

As if women need your help.

0 Replies

@spendius,

spendius wrote:

. . . God had fixed it that way. He wanted an excuse to throw them out so that just like all the creatures in evolution He wanted to cover the earth with his most perfect yet creation. Eve I mean. . .

Doh! Why not just create a world of Eves?

0 Replies

1 Reply

Balkan flood caused by Serbian church leader's hatred of gay people
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/god-punished-balkans-with-floods-for-conchita-wursts-eurovision-2014-win-says-serbian-church-leader-9419300.html

0 Replies

God does NOT exsist. The proof is the 2 slit experiement,Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle, and the Quantum Eraser Principle.
In order for god to be god he MUST be omniscient (why would you worship one who was not?)
If god is all knowing the 2 slit experiment would NOT work and we know that it does work...over and over again.
If god is all knowing HUP would be violated and chemsitry would not work and the universe as we know it would not have formed; ergo we wouldn't be here. (your existence proves there is no god)
2+2=4 EVERYWHERE in the universe. If you violate the basic principles of nature, (the nature of the universe) nothing works...even if you are god. If god created physics he has to abide by its laws...because it's the only way they will work.

3 Replies

@giujohn,

Who said God is omniscient (all-knowing?)
On the contrary, he gives us free will to do as we please so that he can see how we do, then on Judgement Day we hear the verdict.. Smile

0 Replies

@giujohn,

giujohn wrote:

God does NOT exsist. The proof is the 2 slit experiement,Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle, and the Quantum Eraser Principle.
In order for god to be god he MUST be omniscient (why would you worship one who was not?)

Who says one has to worship a god for it to exist?

You are arbitrarily setting up standards that do not have to exist.

Quote:

If god is all knowing the 2 slit experiment would NOT work and we know that it does work...over and over again.
If god is all knowing HUP would be violated and chemsitry would not work and the universe as we know it would not have formed; ergo we wouldn't be here. (your existence proves there is no god)
2+2=4 EVERYWHERE in the universe. If you violate the basic principles of nature, (the nature of the universe) nothing works...even if you are god. If god created physics he has to abide by its laws...because it's the only way they will work.

You ought really to be doing something other than arguing for the non-existence of gods.

1 Reply

Does God Exist?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know