@neologist,
According to the Bible we were also with God in the beginning.
Ephesians 1:4
According as he hath chosen
us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:
Comment:
Does that mean we preexisted because God foreknew us?
And also, my Bible implies Adam was the firstborn of every human.
Unless you are talking about angelic creatures...
So if Jesus was an angel would that still make him a man?
The redemption of mankind required a human sacrifice.
It was supposedly humans that sinned against God in the garden according to Genesis and it would legally take humans to pay for this sin.
That would be like having someone else go to jail for your crimes.
Romans 8:3
For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son
in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
If Jesus was "like" a human he could not have paid for our sins. He had to be a human through and through, or, was his suffering all an act?
An angel cannot pay for the sins of humans. Humans have to pay for their own sins. Should you pay for the sins of others Neo? Would that be right in the eyes of the law? Jesus apparently paid for the sins of the collective of all humanity.
Was Jesus an angel or a human? He can't be both or we would need to be both.
Romans 5:12
Wherefore, as by one
man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all
men, for that all have sinned:
Romans 5:15
But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one
man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many [men].
Romans 5:19
For as by one
man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one [man] shall many be made righteous.
Comment:
How many
men and women preexist their birth Neo?
Either God is a trickster and he implicates humans in sin then uses a non human to pay for these sins or, Jesus was as much a man as any other man.
If God has used tricks to pay for sin has our redemption really been paid in full?
Put lipstick on a pig and it is still a pig.
Jesus would have to be a man in all aspects of the word to pay for sins in the human stead.
A god/man would not count only unless Adam himself was also a God man.
Jesus had to be a human to pay for human sin...
Using a God/man in place of a human is cheating... No court of law in any land is going to allow the use of one kind of species to pay for original sins of another kind of species.
Even Bible law needs to stand up to basic legal scrutiny.
What am I saying here?
That the Bible is so ambiguous I can find the opposite of nearly anything you put forth as rock solid doctrine...
Not much is "solid" when it comes to biblical doctrine.