@RexRed,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:Three of the people killed in Las Vegas last week WERE ARMED, David.
Three of 'em.
They were carrying guns.
Being armed helps sometimes,
but its not a panacea. No one said that it is.
The Secret Service was well armed when Ronald Reagan was shot.
U think thay 'll want to throw their guns away, because of that failure??
Will u try to convince them to see the error of their ways????
If u had invited those 2 police officers
to throw their guns in the garbage, whatayathink thay 'd say???
The 2nd Amendment does not warrant that u will win every gunfight,
but it helps the victim to rise to the level of power of the predator.
U know, its like hospitals, Frank.
People go there for help; thay don t always come out alive,
but its better that the hospitals
EXIST, yes ????
David
RexRed wrote:
Hospital are not a deterrent for illness and hospitals heal gun wounds
rather cause them, hospitals don't carelessly flood society with crazies
with gun fetishes and dreams of insurrection. This is not a hospital,
hospitals try to heal people with mental problems not arm them..
Stupid analogy that does not check out.
U appear not to have been able
to get the point,
which is that hospitals are like guns in that its good to
HAVE THEM,
but thay are
not always INFALLIBLE. Did u get the point
THAT time,
Rex?????
RexRed wrote:The more crazies with guns out there the less effective
your home gun collection will be. CONSIDER THAT CAREFULLY.
That 's not a new concept; no surprize,
but I 'm well aware that
CRIMINALS will arm themselves
to the extent that thay want,
no matter what.
I am not defenseless.
YOU ARE.
RexRed wrote:Do you think the second amendment should protect skinheads
who are racist and think their religion is the only true religion???
The 2nd Amendment merely prevents government
from
HAVING ANY AUTHORITY over possession of personal weapons.
Government has no authority to discriminate in the matter
any more than government can interfere in who reads newspapers, or writes them.
In specific reply to your question
(which is more than u have done for my questions to u)
skinheads and racists have
exactly 1OO% the same rights as anyone else.
If u dispute that, then show me any language of exception in the Constitution.
RexRed wrote:Do you want them and their unregulated militia knocking down your door?
No. I remain confident that will not happen.
RexRed wrote:All so you can have your wet dream sicko fetish over killing instruments?
Do u have wet dreams and fetishes qua
the pictures that
U post, the beautiful scenes with sunsets, etc. ??
Some guns are really beautiful and attractive (I saw some beauties
at a gun show over the weekend) but thay have no relation to sex.
It simply has
never occurred to me to conflate defense with sex.
The only allegations to the contrary have come from the left.
Defense and sex are 2 different worlds.
RexRed wrote:Your idiocy is making everyone else unsafe and all we are asking for is
a little more scrutiny on who owns guns and what these guns are intended for...
That 's
discrimination as to the right to live.
My support of the Bill of Rights
endures intact, permanently
(which is just as well, since I have no authority to compromise the Constitution anyway).
My "idiocy", as u put it, alleging that my mental age is below 3 years,
is
literally and stringently following what the Founders put into this Republic, in its Bill of Rights.
Whether I am an idiot or not, the US Supreme Court has agreed with my pro-liberty position
in the
HELLER and the
McDONALD cases.
David
