Guns And The Laws That Govern Them

Do you think no guns will make us safer Frank? Really look at the society we live in.

Not necessarily, although I think there is a much better chance
of us being a safer society with no guns.

But I doubt seriously that there will ever be "no guns."
That simply is not in the books.

In any case, there was a reason many "wild west" sheriffs required guns
to be checked at the sheriff's office when in town.


There were less shootings that way.

OmSigDAVID wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:

We have MORE guns per capita than any other country BY FAR.

U keep SAYING that
and u keep NOT offering any evidence thereof,
let alone any proof. Is that statistic from your own counting????

Frank Apisa wrote:

I told you earlier to Google "gun ownership by country"
and you would get all the information you need.

Its not my job to prove YOUR allegations.

And it is not my job to jump through hoops for you.

Frank Apisa wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country



Lots, lots more there if you really want it.

I checked your link.
It is not shown to be sourced from credible, respectible survays.
We cannot even GUESS how those numbers were gathered.
No one counted MY guns, but me. I hope that u r right,
and that America really DOES have more per capita guns,
but I see no credible evidence of that yet.

I didn't think you would.

But that is because you do not want to see it.

That is not bad enuf.
U offer no evidence of guns being defensively carried on the person
during ordinary inter-personal activity, like the Samurai 's swords,
as distinct from guns kept at home, maybe stashed in desks.'

You still have not made your point about the Samurai suggestion.
What are you saying about the Samurai...and this silly contention of yours?

The effects of those guns will be manifested in terms of politeness IF
others believe that people with whom thay converse r well armed,
not in terms of what equipment thay have at home.
David

Ahhh...you have dropped the "safer" part of that nonsense, I see.

David...your thesis that more guns in the hands of more people is an ABSURDITY.
But keep making it if you want.

Baldimo wrote:

Do you think no guns will make us safer Frank? Really look at the society we live in.

Frank Apisa wrote:

Not necessarily, although I think there is a much better chance
of us being a safer society with no guns.

But I doubt seriously that there will ever be "no guns."
That simply is not in the books.

In any case, there was a reason many "wild west" sheriffs required guns
to be checked at the sheriff's office when in town.


There were less shootings that way.

REALLY, Frank????
Whodathunkit????

Please reveal unto us
the source of your information regarding
HOW MANY FEWER shootings there were, Frank. We 'll truly appreciate that information.

Before we believe u,
we 'll need to look at your evidence; that 's fair.





David

OmSigDAVID wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:

We have MORE guns per capita than any other country BY FAR.

U keep SAYING that
and u keep NOT offering any evidence thereof,
let alone any proof. Is that statistic from your own counting????

Frank Apisa wrote:

I told you earlier to Google "gun ownership by country"
and you would get all the information you need.

Its not my job to prove YOUR allegations.

Frank Apisa wrote:

And it is not my job to jump through hoops for you.

U r responsible for your own (un-supported) allegations, not me.

Quote:

Frank Apisa wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country



Lots, lots more there if you really want it.

I checked your link.
It is not shown to be sourced from credible, respectible survays.
We cannot even GUESS how those numbers were gathered.
No one counted MY guns, but me. I hope that u r right,
and that America really DOES have more per capita guns,
but I see no credible evidence of that yet.

Frank Apisa wrote:

I didn't think you would.

But that is because you do not want to see it.

There was NOTHING there to see.

DAVID wrote:

That is not bad enuf.
U offer no evidence of guns being defensively carried on the person
during ordinary inter-personal activity, like the Samurai 's swords,
as distinct from guns kept at home, maybe stashed in desks.'

Frank Apisa wrote:

You still have not made your point about the Samurai suggestion.
What are you saying about the Samurai...and this silly contention of yours?

1. Thay were well armed with swords.
2. Consequently, thay lived in an environment of courtesy.

DAVID wrote:

The effects of those guns will be manifested in terms of politeness IF
others believe that people with whom thay converse r well armed,
not in terms of what equipment thay have at home.
David

Frank Apisa wrote:

Ahhh...you have dropped the "safer" part of that nonsense, I see.

David...your thesis that more guns in the hands of more people is an ABSURDITY.
But keep making it if you want.

That 's the same as your saying that it is an "absurdity"
to believe that obama was born in America.

Multiple be the chuckles.





David

OmSigDAVID wrote:

Multiple be the chuckles.





David

Thanks.

Actually, I got out for nine holes after finishing with the aunts...and hit a few decent shots.

Some of the other shots, however, provided some chuckles also.

Frank Apisa wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

Multiple be the chuckles.





David

Thanks.

Actually, I got out for nine holes after finishing with the aunts...and hit a few decent shots.

Some of the other shots, however, provided some chuckles also.

I like gunshots. I TRULY DO!

My mind has been locked onto guns
since age 3, or earlier. I had to wait 5 years.
Now, I have all I want.
David

Does he count as a special interest group and big money donor? Outside money that is trying to influence state and local elections to get his ideas passed as laws for others to follow?

He can go and waste his money as far as I'm concerned. I know how well his big money did here in Colorado during the recall elections for the anti-gun politicians. In fact his money was doing so well that the 3rd politician that was set to be recalled quit the race and allowed someone one to be appointed by our Democrat Governor.

If Bloom berg offered me
all of his billions in exchange
for the right to defend my life: no sale.





David

People should not have to defend their lives...