@RexRed,
RexRed wrote:The idea of gun regulation is to make sure the dog is shot and the child is saved.
No. Gun control finds its genesis in controls against blacks,
beginning with the slave rebellions, particularly in that
thay got some guns and killed some white children in the early 18OOs.
Originally, the gun control statutes explicitly applied only to the black race.
Gun control laws were to hold the slaves conveniently, safely, in subjection.
In the 19OOs, direct mention of race dropped off, dropped out of the statutory language,
but the fundamental concept was
discrimination
as to
WHO 'd be able to defend his life, if that became necessary.
The main idea of licensure of
any kind
(e.g., license to be an electrician, license to practice dentistry, license to fly planes)
is
DISCRIMINATION between those who
HAVE that license and those who dont.
A license is a borderline.
The concept of
equal rights and the concept of
licensure are like
hot and
cold;
thay
cannot stand together. So when the USSC said to Rosa Parks
that she had an
equal right to a few minutes of seating on a bus,
when she steps
OFF that bus (according to gun control philosophy),
she does not have an equal right to defend herself from an attacking
pack of dogs, nor from criminals. The police or a judge decide who
has the right to defend his life, like an American Samurai Class.
(U know the Samurai in Japan ?)
I am of the opinion that
everyone has an equal right to defend his or her life
from predatory violence, regardless of upon whom the
favor of government rests,
and no one needs any permission of government to exercise that right.
The Founders of this Republic believed that.
When this Republic was founded in the 17OOs, there were
NO Police
anywhere in the USA;
not until the following century.
Each citizen was expected to take care of himself.
There survives a letter from Thomas Jefferson to his 12 year old nephew
counselling the lad always to take his gun with him, when he goes out for a walk,
and to practice for proficiency in its use. Failure to wear your guns then
was looked upon the same as failure to wear your seatbelt now:
IRRESPONSIBLE and in some colonies:
un-lawful.
David