@spendius,
There's nothing new in it of course. Except that Byzantium and Ancient Egyptians trained their attendants from an early age to fulfill their roles rather than having a bunch of power-hungry, vulgar counter-jumpers who happen to have that gift of the gab style most seductive to the popular ear.
Other than that it is exactly what one might expect to those who study history searching for common denominators rather than flavours of the century.
The intrigue of the climb up the steps to the throne. And the throne now is the bloody voters. All of whom want more cakes, their feet washing and their arse wiping.
How on earth anybody expects them to know what they are doing under such trying circumstances is a mystery to me. Especially as the voter's modern skill of engineering a cliff-hanger has to be finessed as best as maybe.
When the voters get better at it, under the guiding hand of what are ironically known as opinion formers, all 50 states will become swing states. Not becoming a swing state is stupid really. It's like telling an auctioneer what you're prepared to go up to before the sale.
A few years ago the constituency with the largest Labour majority, all other candidates losing their deposits, was also the most deprived and socially backward constituency.
In the end it is a question of whether a system worked out on paper can outlast one that has evolved. Will the NFL outlast the football of the rest of the world?
The Industrial Revolution wasn't worked out on paper.