JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Dec, 2012 08:21 pm
We appear to be at an impasse.

Quote:
the Saturday negotiations between Reid and McConnell appeared — outwardly, at least — to yield little in the way of consensus. Obama said Friday that if the Senate leaders could not strike a deal, he would ask Reid to advance bare-boned legislation that would preserve tax rates on income under $250,000 and extend expiring benefits for the unemployed.

A Senate Democratic aide said Saturday afternoon that Democrats were preparing to move ahead with that very plan and were not particularly optimistic about the prospects of reaching an accord with McConnell, whom they characterized as offering proposals he knows the Democrats will not accept. More
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Dec, 2012 11:54 pm
Quote:
When asked who they believed to be more responsible for the "fiscal cliff" situation, 27 percent blamed Republicans in Congress, 16 percent blamed Obama and 6 percent pointed to Democrats in Congress. The largest percentage - 31 percent - blamed "all of the above."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/27/the-fiscal-cliff_n_2371667.html

dems are running around claiming that the vast majority blame the repubs...a bold faced lie this is....27% say repubs, 22% say dems, and 31% say both.
parados
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 07:56 am
@hawkeye10,
27% blame Republicans.
31% blame Republicans and Democrats.

It looks to me like 58% blame Republicans while only 47% blame Obama and 37% blame Democrats. I don't know how you can claim that 31% don't blame Republicans other than through a bold faced lie or complete ignorance of what "all of the above" means.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 12:12 pm
The Senate is in session; the House follows next hour.

Senate Dems will caucus at 3:00pm EST. No word yet on any kind of agreement. Obama blamed the Rs this morning on Meet the Press. Beohner responded as expected with pointing the finger back at the Pres.

There are times that I agree with Sen. Coburn from OK. This is one of those times.

Quote:
"I think there are a couple of advantages. There's a lot of disadvantages," he said. "One of the advantages is the American people are going to see what the real cost of their government is, the actual real cost for the very wealthy."

"What people don't realize is the well-connected, well-heeled in this country take most of the advantage of all the deductions and all the giveaways in the tax code," he added.

Coburn said this could lead to a push for tax reform, a cause he has long advocated.
Huff Post
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 01:46 pm
Reid is out re the negotiations and Biden is in. McConnell made an offer Sat night. No counter-offer from the Dems yet.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 01:49 pm
@JPB,


Biden will bring a gun to the negotiations
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 01:51 pm
@JPB,
JPB wrote:

The Rs really don't want drastic cuts to the military budget. Other than that, I think both sides are willing for the tax increases that will come automatically and then they can give a smaller tax cut and call it a cut.


Seeing as how the Budget Control Act caters heavily towards Democratic ideas in regard to budget cuts aimed mainly at the military, and doesn't affect Social Security, Medicaid, civil and military employee pay, or veterans, although Medicare benefits would be limited to a 2% reduction (this I got from Wiki), it's perplexing how the Republicans actually went with this deal and voted for it.
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 03:17 pm
@InfraBlue,
Well, the idea was supposedly that allowing the sequester cuts to occur would be so painful that they'd force themselves to agree to something (ANYTHING) as an alternative. So far.... that remains to be seen. In the meantime

@LisaMascaroinDC GOP Sen Collins says a bipartisan "common sense caucus" has been talking backup plan if leaders go off #fiscalcliff #GangofEveryOneElse

Wouldn't it be interesting if a group of sane people was able to accomplish what the leadership cannot?
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 03:20 pm
The latest is that Senate Ds and Rs are in agreement with taxes going up >$400,000 - 500,000 but they disagree on where those tax $$$ can be spent. Dems want new spending, Rs want sequester offsets.
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 03:22 pm
Chained CPI for SS was on, but now off the table.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 03:37 pm
Quote:
@ryangrim GOP's reenactment of Picket's Charge on social security went as well for them as it did for Picket. They're now in full retreat.


Laughing
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 04:59 pm
The two sides are negotiating a solution that neither of them can enact alone.

It is meaningless to go off about who won the most recent presidential election.

It will happen if both sides get something they must have for giving up something they don't have to have.

Social Security reform is coming, if not now than later, and eventually the Democrats will have to accept it. If they refuse to accept it now, it is for purely political reasons.

JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 05:02 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
No one is accepting anything tonight, it seems.

The Senate will reconvene tomorrow at 11:00am
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  2  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 05:22 pm
Yes, yes, yes!!!

"Something has gone terribly wrong when the biggest threat to our American economy is the American Congress." @Sen_JoeManchin D WV
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 05:41 pm
@JPB,
Quote:
The latest is that Senate Ds and Rs are in agreement with taxes going up >$400,000 - 500,000 but they disagree on where those tax $$$ can be spent.


I think that they are trying to deal with too many issues at the same time, and that's making compromise next to impossible. They should focus on letting the tax cuts expire for only the wealthiest--and raise taxes for that group--and stop arguing about other changes-- to estate taxes, and tax deductions--that have gotten thrown into the discussions, but that should really be tabled for the moment until more comprehensive tax reforms can be addressed without this deadline looming.

Similarly, the issue of reducing spending, to address the deficit, is not the most immediate problem, one that has to be solved by Monday. Yes, spending cuts have to be made, but those can't, and shouldn't, be done recklessly, just to avoid going off the fiscal cliff, because the wrong move could plunge a fragile recovery back into a severe recession. There is no lasting harm to the economy that will result from the wealthiest paying a little more in taxes, it will generate needed revenue, but a lot of harm could result from the wrong spending cuts, made in haste, just to strike a deal.

I don't think the majority of Republicans are without common sense, or are really entirely unwilling to let the tax cuts for the wealthiest expire. It's mainly a group of more extreme right wing Republicans in the House who refuse to budge, so they hold the others hostage, and to appease them, the leadership drags in the entitlement programs as leverage, demanding cuts there, essentially as a face-saving move for their party if the wealthy do wind up having to pay more in taxes. It's not about what is good for the country, or the economy, right now, I think it's about the Republicans trying to save face and deal with their more extreme members.

I am absolutely sick of the partisan nonsense, particularly when party and politics is placed above the welfare of the country and the immediate welfare of the economy. Most of the issues being batted around can wait until after Monday, and they should wait until after Monday, so the most immediate problems can be resolved by Monday night. These people need to prioritize the way they do triage in a hospital ER--you address the most serious, urgent emergencies first, and the others can wait a little longer. How to reduce spending, and where the tax dollars can be spent, and reforming our tax codes, can wait a little longer.

But, they're not asking me. And, at the moment, I'm so disgusted, I'm not bothering to watch cable news. I'm tired of listening to them, and to the excuses for their failure to get this situation resolved.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 05:45 pm
@firefly,
Im not so generous with any understandings about Congress. They have NOT passed a farm bill and thats not some special topic that should be jutified with this Glacial pattern.
I want us to remember this crap when the next batch of elections happen nd we should all send clear message to Congress to VOTE every damn incumbent out . Theyve not done the peoples business at all.
Self important bunch of plutocrats
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 05:50 pm
@farmerman,
I agree with you about the failure to pass a farm bill. That's another disgrace.

The price of milk, and of all products made with milk, is going to skyrocket if they don't do something.

The entire situation with Congress is sickening. It's time for them to act like adults and remember why they are there.
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 05:51 pm
@firefly,
I think we should let them know that weve lost confidence in the whole bunch D's and R's
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 05:55 pm
@farmerman,
I think they already know that. How much lower can their approval rating get?
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Dec, 2012 05:56 pm
@farmerman,
I saw reports of a one year (?) extension passing out of both committees. No word on whether Boehner will bring it to the floor for a vote but it could pass and be signed by Obama by Tuesday. I agree with you on the total disfunction going on in the Congress. I see the problem as K-Street and partisan politics driven. I'm more convinced than ever that we need a viable independent-driven focus on getting rid of our career politicians.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Fiscal Cliff
  3. » Page 35
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 04:30:57