30
   

How Many White People Will Vote for Romney Because He's White?

 
 
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 08:36 pm

Let's all hope that skin color isn't a factor this go round and
people vote for the man that's most qualified for the job.
















If this happens, Obama will be defeated by Romney because Romney's
qualifications, experience and record are superior to what Obama has to offer.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 08:40 pm
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

Do you expect to get any straight answers, snood?


(sigh) I guess I keep underestimating the willingness of a few determined assholes to shyt all over any thread that raises issues of race.

But I defy any reasonable person to make the case that this election doesn't have a powerful racial aspect that is a dynamic in its prosecution. I just saw Nate Silver (very famous statistician) say on TV that this will be the most racially polarized electorate in history.
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 08:45 pm
Since Obama won last time with necessary support from white voters, I'd sorta think this question would be moot. The question seems like an intro to saying if Obama isn't elected - it is due to racism.

He's been elected once. Was THAT due to - or despite- racism of voters? How would it be due to racism the second time, but not responsible for the first election?

I think the GOP has stepped away from Romney due to his religion. Does that go into the discrimination hopper?
McGentrix
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 08:46 pm
@snood,
Why don't you tell us crackers what is you want us to say Snood. I'd willingly reply.

Blacks have been voting primarily Dem for quite some time now, as my previous post demonstrated. I do not believe that if Romney were black and Obama were white that the black vote would suddenly be switched around. They would primarily continue voting for the Democrat candidate.

Would some blacks vote for a candidate simply because of race, sure. Just like some whites will.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 08:47 pm
The ones that secretly despise people of color are very sneaky making their points, always seeking to turn the proposition around.
Eva
 
  3  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 08:53 pm
@Lash,
Yes, Obama won last time with a good deal of support from white voters. I don't know about other parts of the U.S., but here in Oklahoma & Texas, there were a good number of white non-voters that didn't bother going to the polls because they just didn't believe it was possible that a black would actually be elected. Now that it has happened, it has really mobilized the racists.
Eva
 
  3  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 09:03 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:
...I think the GOP has stepped away from Romney due to his religion. Does that go into the discrimination hopper?


Not here. They're not happy about his religion, but race hatred trumps religious intolerance. I think a lot of the insistence that Obama is actually Muslim is just a smokescreen for racism.
georgeob1
 
  0  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 09:10 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:

My premise (actually, the premise of the writer in the source article I cited) stands. And that is that while blacks are accused of voting for Obama because he’s black, we don’t see whites being held to account for voting for Romney simply because he’s white.


If this premise is true, then based on readily available statistics for voting patterns in the last presidential election the problem, such as it is, is far greater among Black voter than whites. That is simply obvious.

I'm not aware that anyone here has criticized Black votters for favoring Obama by such an obviously large margin. Certainly I have not done so. It may be that you are using a minor problem to project your own racism on others. What we have seen among Obama's old associates, including the esteemed Rev. Wright sugggests there may be some influences of Black racism in his past. No one here has made very much of that possibility.

My point is that self-serving racism, prejudices of many kinds and other forms of stupidity are part of the human condition. They afflict us all more or less equally.

There is no shortage of valid (depending on ones values) reasons to oppose Obama's reelection. None of them have to do with race. It is offensive for you to suggest (as you have done repeatedly here) that if Obama loses it will be an indicator of White racism.

It appears to me that it is you here who has a problem dealing with reality.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  2  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 09:12 pm
@Eva,
I'd be interested to see evidence of that, Eva.

I know I hear a lot of people who voted for Obama last time say they won't again. I think there are likely many more who are disappointed with his administration who won't vote for him. It seems useless and so very tired to call it racism...unless you have some information about that specifically.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  2  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 09:14 pm
@Eva,
But none of that is new. It was all said before the first election.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 09:14 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:

edgarblythe wrote:

Do you expect to get any straight answers, snood?


(sigh) I guess I keep underestimating the willingness of a few determined assholes to shyt all over any thread that raises issues of race.

But I defy any reasonable person to make the case that this election doesn't have a powerful racial aspect that is a dynamic in its prosecution. I just saw Nate Silver (very famous statistician) say on TV that this will be the most racially polarized electorate in history.


Apparently you do then accept the readily available statistics. I agree they were undeniable in 2008 when Obama won and will likely be evident also in the comong election. However, you can't have it both ways.

I'm not an asshole and I didn't **** all over your thread(s) on this subject. Instead I merely offered you sone reasonable and entirely rational arguments in an attempt to influence your rather one-sided view of this matter and your hypocritical projection of your own prejudices on others.

Your problem is you can't take it like an adult.
0 Replies
 
Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 09:34 pm
I'm a political junkie. I was in Seattle the night Obama was elected. The atmosphere was electric. Granted, I haven't been a part of July 4th since I was a kid, I'd imagine it has the same energy.
Since that night, I've spent many a night in the US and I admit to starting 'political' conversations... wherever I go at home or away.
I have to admit, the discourse in the US is very different, and much of it has been very racist. Maybe cause I'm very, very white.. people feel the need to confide in me some horrible thoughts, or maybe cause it's just the nature of the beast, but I've been privy to some shockingly revealing discussions.
I was recently at a convention, where a former republican presidential nominee made some really contentious statements and later I was at the brunt of a Neanderthal rant about 'Chocolate Jesus'. I'm only in the US for bits and spurts and I hear racist stuff, how can anyone living there not hear it? I've heard it on cruises, in airport queues and local diners..
It's shocking as a guest to hear in your country, it must take a lead ear to ignore it at home.
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 09:52 pm
Quote:
your hypocritical projection of your own prejudices on others


Pot and kettle. What prejudices of mine do you see in this thread?
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 10:03 pm
It's hard to have an honest discussion when some here would deny that most if not all the ugly instances of race-baiting in this election have come from the right. How hard does anyone have to think to come up with another nasty "shuckin and jivin", "food stamp president", "magic negro" comment from someone from the right?

Are these folks actually trying to sell that racism against Barack Obama is a non-factor?

Because if they are, edgarblythe was correct in suggesting that I would get no straight answers to my question. At least from the deniers.
roger
 
  3  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 10:04 pm
@Ceili,
Not really. I don't hear that at all (well almost) mostly because of the people I know. I'm pretty much the conservative onion in the liberal petunia patch.

They tolerate me well.
georgeob1
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 10:49 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:

It's hard to have an honest discussion when some here would deny that most if not all the ugly instances of race-baiting in this election have come from the right. How hard does anyone have to think to come up with another nasty "shuckin and jivin", "food stamp president", "magic negro" comment from someone from the right?

Are these folks actually trying to sell that racism against Barack Obama is a non-factor?


Well it is certainly true that most of the Oposition to President Obama, whether it is based on opposition to the policies he advocates, or racism or anything else, is on the political right. That of course is merely a tautology.

There is quite obviously no shortage of seriously disputed policy issues that animates "the right" in this election. It simply isn't any more reasonable or realistic to atrtribute all or most of the opposition to Obama from "the Right" to racism, than it is to assert that most of the support for him from Blacks is based on race. You can't take one without the other. However I have the strong impression (not certainty) that you are implying that the great majority of the support for Obama among Blacks is based on his policies, and not his color. Am I wrong in this?

It's racism either way, and you are asserting that only one group is infected with it. That defies common sense.

It is an observable fact that, on several occasions widely broadcast by the media, and involving large Black audiences, Obams has drifted far from his normal manner of speech into the identifiable patois associated with many Blacks. That is a somewhat strange behavior, one that some might think patronizing. I don't know for sure what the critics referring to shuckin & jiving might have been referring to, but that seems to be a likely possibility.

As to the food stamp bit, it is simply a fact that he has extended the reach of eligibility for and access to this program far more than any other Administration. It is now a subsidy for the middle class as well, and some believe that will be harmful to us in the long run.

Finally I don't think that racisn is a "non-factor" among ANY segment of the electorate , including both pro and anti Obama folks of all colors.. The thoughts and motives of human beings are a complex mixture of rational and irrational judgmnents, beliefs, fears, and preconceptions.

Where we disagree is your insistence that racism is a necessary component among any white person who opposes Obama, while it is not the case for others. That is wrong, offensive and insulting. It is also a bit racist.

Ceili, I make routine trips up to Calgary in my work. There aren't many Blacks there, but there are rapidly increasing numbers of south Asian immigrants. I have heard many offensive comments about them from nice Canadians who probably would never say anything nasty about Blacks. I also recall that while growing up in Detroit the folks across the river in Windsor Ontario behaved more or less the same as the white folks in Michigan in this area. Virtue in this area of life is, as in many othersis, very often merely the absence of temptation or opportunity.
0 Replies
 
Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2012 10:52 pm
@roger,
For the record roger, I don't equate conservative with racist. My husband is true blue.. I can't remember what's what in the states, but he's got a conservative bent. As does the vast majority of friends and family. I'm kind of a lone wolf, as it were. None the less, I didn't expect the openness, the bare, the shear racist stuff I've heard.
Roger, trust me, I didn't go looking for it. I don't live in Utopia and I don't expect prudishness, but I've heard stuff I would never hear here. Prejudice and ignorance live everywhere and I have heard shite here too, but it's not as blatant.. in your face.
I truly believe there is an equal amount of voters, if not more, that will vote against Obama because he is black.
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Reply Sat 27 Oct, 2012 06:39 am
@Eva,
Eva wrote:

a good number of white non-voters that didn't bother going to the polls because they just didn't believe it was possible that a black would actually be elected. Now that it has happened, it has really mobilized the racists.


LOL!

The mobilization of Americans to vote against Obama is due to his
terrible job performance as president and the fact that he is a racists.
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  2  
Reply Sat 27 Oct, 2012 07:54 am
@Ceili,
Comments from Colin Powell's Chief of Staff.

Quote:
Retired Army Col. Lawrence Wilkerson made the comment in response to Mitt Romney campaign surrogate John Sununu's suggestion on Thursday that Powell's endorsement of President Barack Obama's re-election was motivated by race. Wilkerson, who served as Powell's chief of staff when the general was secretary of state during the first George W. Bush term, told Schultz that he respected Sununu "as a Republican, as a member of my party," but did not "have any respect for the integrity of the position that [Sununu] seemed to codify."

When asked by Schultz what, if anything, the remark said about the attitudes of the Republican Party, Wilkerson said:

My party, unfortunately, is the bastion of those people -- not all of them, but most of them -- who are still basing their positions on race. Let me just be candid: My party is full of racists, and the real reason a considerable portion of my party wants President Obama out of the White House has nothing to do with the content of his character, nothing to do with his competence as commander-in-chief and president, and everything to do with the color of his skin, and that's despicable.

The retired colonel also said that "to say that Colin Powell would endorse President Obama because of his skin color is like saying Mother Theresa worked for profit."
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Oct, 2012 08:01 am
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/27/14740413-ap-poll-majority-harbor-prejudice-against-blacks?lite
AP poll: Majority harbor prejudice against blacks
By The Associated Press
Racial attitudes have not improved in the four years since the United States elected its first black president, an Associated Press poll finds, as a slight majority of Americans now express prejudice toward blacks whether they recognize those feelings or not.
Those views could cost President Barack Obama votes as he tries for re-election, the survey found, though the effects are mitigated by some Americans' more favorable views of blacks.

Racial prejudice has increased slightly since 2008 whether those feelings were measured using questions that explicitly asked respondents about racist attitudes, or through an experimental test that measured implicit views toward race without asking questions about that topic directly.


In all, 51 percent of Americans now express explicit anti-black attitudes, compared with 48 percent in a similar 2008 survey.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 6.92 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 11:01:12