@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:Sorry Robert, I neglected to use "usually," but since you can't be considered partisan, let alone hyper-partisan, I can imagine why you would be put off by my neglect.
Good, it's weird when someone just talks right past you as if you are a political caricature they were expecting.
Quote:Well, I do have money on it and I expect to win big because when I placed my bet I locked in very favorable odds.
Nice. At least you are the first one I know who is putting money on that belief, means you really believe it and aren't just hoping out lout.
Quote:Given your expressed opinions on drone attacks, it's not a secret that you aren't cheering for Obama, but it would be a shocking surprise if you revealed that you would rather see Romney win.
I favor Gary Johnson and because of the crappy political system America has I really have no dog in this fight. I'd be happy to see Obama lose but that happiness would probably be balanced out by seeing an even more hawkish and much less intellectually honest person become the president.
It's heads you win tails I lose for me.
Quote:BTW, if you think any of my assumptions are intended to "work on you," you may share the self-absorption of Obama.
I don't know where you get all that. I'm just saying that you talk to me as if I'm a dyed-in-the-wool liberal for some reason. And I think the reason is that you have an inordinate tendency to need to reconcile everything into the narrative of partisan politics.
So given that I'm not on your "side" you talk right past me like I'm the caricature you have of the other side. It's no big deal though, just a pity, to me (because you are one of the few conservatives on this site worth talking to on the political threads), as it makes it harder to have conversations with you when I can't live up to being the foil you expect of me.