28
   

Tonight's Presidential Candidate Debate...

 
 
MMarciano
 
  2  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2012 06:23 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
You're another repulsive republican piece of garbage around here, see you after the elections, unless they implement the new poof be gone function!
H2O MAN
 
  -4  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2012 06:27 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,


Are they at full panic yet, or will that come later?
MMarciano
 
  2  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2012 08:14 pm
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:



Are they at full panic yet, or will that come later?


It will come if you ever get your GED!
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  5  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2012 09:56 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Cyclo = The Amazing Kreskin

He knows what you are thinking!

It doesn't take psychic powers to know you dream of Lewinsky-ing Mr. Romney.
gungasnake
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2012 10:11 pm
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
Cyclo is melting down right before our eyes and it's pretty damn funny



You think it's funny NOW?? (give it about another three weeks.....)
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Sat 20 Oct, 2012 07:00 am
@DrewDad,
Them Dems want to Lewinsky Romney Shocked
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Sat 20 Oct, 2012 07:03 am
@gungasnake,
gungasnake wrote:

Quote:
Cyclo is melting down right before our eyes and it's pretty damn funny



You think it's funny NOW?? (give it about another three weeks.....)


Cyclo's reaction will be something like this
when all networks call the election for Romney


gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Oct, 2012 09:39 pm
@H2O MAN,
I say again... If we can win this one and it looks like we will, then on the day Mitt Romney's second term ends, Paul Ryan will be around 50 years old, at the very top of his game and ready to take over his half of 16 years during which no stinking Gaea-worshiping de-moKKKer-RAT ever gets close to the white house at all, even via the servants' entrance.

In a space of time that large, there's every possibility that we can find a way to drive some final nail into the coffin of the rat party and eliminate it altogether.
DrewDad
 
  2  
Reply Sat 20 Oct, 2012 09:51 pm
@gungasnake,
Hold on to those delusions, Gunga.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 21 Oct, 2012 05:08 pm
@MMarciano,
You can't imagine how crushed I am that you hold me in low esteem.

However I think I can appreciate why you exclusively view the world through a lens of sexual orientation, somewhere along the line you've taken a paranoid fantasy and immersed yourself in it:

The secret Mormon directed agenda of Mitt Romeny is to exterminate homosexuals.

The ultimate Victim Profile.
Rockhead
 
  2  
Reply Sun 21 Oct, 2012 05:12 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
you're projecting again, finny...
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Reply Sun 21 Oct, 2012 05:15 pm
@H2O MAN,
Not yet.

They still have the Gloria Alred October surprise to unveil, the vaporization of a bunch of camel herders in the Libyan desert, and the announcement that unemployment has dropped to 5.2%

Not to mention today's report in the NY Times that the US and Iran have agreed to direct negotiations on Iran's nuclear weapons plans.

What is there to negotiate?

Obama has said they can't have them and they have to have them to advance their goals.

In any case, the Iranians won't engage in such talks until after the election, so all Obama has is a feeble talking point.

Imagine why he had to give or promise to get them to agree to these talks.
roger
 
  3  
Reply Sun 21 Oct, 2012 05:25 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Same as negotiations with North Korea on the same subject. It buys them time for further enrichment and developement.
JTT
 
  2  
Reply Sun 21 Oct, 2012 06:00 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
You can't imagine how crushed I am that you hold me in low esteem.


I read MM's post, Finn. He expressed that he held you in high regard.

Quote:
However I think I can appreciate why you exclusively view the world through a lens of sexual orientation, somewhere along the line you've taken a paranoid fantasy and immersed yourself in it:

The secret Mormon directed agenda of Mitt Romeny is to exterminate homosexuals.

The ultimate Victim Profile.


A wee bit over the top, doncha think, Finn?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  2  
Reply Sun 21 Oct, 2012 06:35 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
What is there to negotiate?


The fact that they are a sovereign nation which has had to suffer through more than half a century of US terrorism, US theft of their natural resources, US supporting wars against them, not to mention aiding the use of chemicial weapons against them.

And you say, what is there to negotiate. You're such a kidder, Finn.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2012 12:37 am
@roger,
roger wrote:
Same as negotiations with North Korea on the same subject.
It buys them time for further enrichment and developement.
That 's exactly what it is.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2012 07:01 am
@roger,
Indeed.

One would think that by now that our government is on to this tactic of rogue nations, but I suppose if a "breakthrough" is necessary prior to tonight's presidential debate on foreign policy, this sort of qualifies.
revelette
 
  2  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2012 08:27 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Actually there is a bit of a mix up with the NYT article concerning Iran and "one on one" talks.

Quote:
But National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor pushed back against the Times's story.

"It’s not true that the United States and Iran have agreed to one-on-one talks or any meeting after the American elections," he said in a statement.

"We continue to work with the P5+1 on a diplomatic solution and have said from the outset that we would be prepared to meet bilaterally. The president has made clear that he will prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and we will do what we must to achieve that," Vietor added. "It has always been our goal for sanctions to pressure Iran to come in line with its obligations. The onus is on the Iranians to do so, otherwise they will continue to face crippling sanctions and increased pressure."

The Times report came barely more than 48 hours ahead of the third and final presidential debate, which will focus on foreign policy. Signs that Iran is willing to negotiate on its nuclear program could be helpful to Obama, who has long favored a diplomatic resolution to tensions with Iran and has implemented new sanctions aimed at forcing Tehran into negotiations.

UPDATE: The Times story has been updated to include Vietor's statement and to say that the United States and Iran have "agreed in principle" to talks.


source
Finn dAbuzz
 
  2  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2012 11:36 am
@revelette,
What is the difference between agreeing in principle and simply agreeing?

The original NYT story didn't report that details had been agreed upon (ie time and place), and so an agreement to talk would seem to be essentially the same as a an agreement in principle to talk.

Either way, the source you quote indicates the development could be advantageous to Obama...which of course was the purpose of the original article and the original "leak" that gave rise to it.

I don't see it as providing much of an advantage at all. The Americans who pay any attention to international affairs know that talks are used by our enemies to buy time. I doubt they will think differently about talks with Iran.

Unless the Iranians have come begging, agreeing to talks is another sign of weakness.
JTT
 
  3  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2012 08:08 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
The Americans who pay any attention to international affairs know that talks are used by our enemies to buy time.


Yeah, that pisses Americans off no end. They like to get right to bombing the **** out of innocents, raping and torturing them, murdering little children.

Diplomacy and talking doesn't make the military industrial complex any money.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 08/13/2020 at 03:08:02