17
   

U.S. middle east policy, pros and cons: discuss

 
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2012 03:06 pm
@izzythepush,
Pre-judgment of the Egyptian MD has been pretty accurate.

To give the world's Useful Idiots cover they pledged during the Arab Spring not to field a candidate for the presidency. This allowed an Obama leashed moron with zero concern about his personal credibility, to testify before congress that the MB was "largely secular."

But guess what? The current president of Egypt is a leader of the MB!

How the hell did that happen when they promised the world it wouldn't?

That Liberals around the Western world have taken up the defense of Islamists is indicative of how central anti-Americanism is to their beliefs, and how fatuous their sanctimonious condemnation of religion (Read: Christianity) actually is.

cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2012 03:08 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
What has the condemnation of christianity have anything to do with the ME?
izzythepush
 
  0  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2012 03:15 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Oh don't talk **** Finn. You don't like Moslems, any sort of Moslem, because of your huge sense of entitlement.
izzythepush
 
  0  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2012 03:27 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
As for 'useful idiots,' with your tongue stuck right up the rich man's arse, you're the most useful idiot of them all.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  3  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2012 05:46 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Nothing, but it has everything to do with the vacuous hypocrisy of the Western Left.

Christianity, for the Left, is the perfect example of the evils of organized religion, based largely on practices hundreds of years in the past. Whereas, Islam which as I write is a perfect example of what the Left condemns in religions, is coddled, appeased and defended.

All the proof one needs that the Western Left is morally and intellectually bankrupt.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  3  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2012 05:48 pm
@izzythepush,
Two inane comments in a row from izzy.

Are you capable of defending your positions without school-boy insults?
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2012 07:16 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
You wrote,
Quote:
Are you capable of defending your positions without school-boy insults?


Hell, you're the king of ad hominems. What more need be said? You're a loser, and many a2kers know it.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  2  
Reply Mon 1 Oct, 2012 07:19 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Thus Sprach The Demented One!

(And many a2kers know it)

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  0  
Reply Tue 2 Oct, 2012 01:47 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
You started them off, I respond to fascists in kind. It's true, you view the Arabs as a whole and the Palestinians in particular as subhuman, you think that as an American you have every right to their resources, and they have no rights to anything.

I don't think fascists deserve special treatment. You're not allowed to be rude to others without others being rude to you just because you're a fascist.

It's rather pathetic actually, if you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  3  
Reply Tue 2 Oct, 2012 10:03 am
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:

Here's a clue for you, we're in the Twenty-First Century, not the Sixteenth, nor even the Nineteenth one. Get with the times.



Only 67 years ago the Holocaust occurred. And, today Iran talks about extinguishing the one place on this planet that Jews can live according to their faith, without being a minority. If you think Jews, in the minds of many a European, are not expendable in current "times," you be wrong, Blue.
Foofie
 
  2  
Reply Tue 2 Oct, 2012 10:05 am
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:

...That Israel may have learned ethnocentrism from Europe on a possible two-thousand year learning curve of state sponsored anti-Semitism does not justify the Zionists' discrimination against and oppression of the Palestinian peoples.


And, why be that, Blue? Make an ethical argument, like in an ethics college course!
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Tue 2 Oct, 2012 10:05 am
@Foofie,
They become more "expendable" when they treat Palestinians like they were treated during WWII. Get with the program.

When you take away their homes and property, you take away their lives.
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Oct, 2012 10:09 am
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

They become more "expendable" when they treat Palestinians like they were treated during WWII. Get with the program.

When you take away their homes and property, you take away their lives.


Your home and property (collectively) was taken away, yet you (collectively) had the intelligence/foresight to not devolve into blind hate. Your lives were not taken away, as your successful family can attest to. Why don't you analyze the situation, based on the abilities and emotional intelligence you have seen in your own demographic? Double standard? You giving someone a pass?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Oct, 2012 10:11 am
@Foofie,
Try to take away any property from Americans today as Jews are doing in Israel, and see what happens.
Foofie
 
  2  
Reply Tue 2 Oct, 2012 10:14 am
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Try to take away any property from Americans today as Jews are doing in Israel, and see what happens.


That's why schmekles vote Democratic, so small business owners can be taxed out of business.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Oct, 2012 11:15 am
@Foofie,
What the hell are you talking about? What has that got to do with anything I posted?
0 Replies
 
revelette
 
  2  
Reply Tue 2 Oct, 2012 11:37 am
@Foofie,
The whole "wipe Israel off the map" thing is a mistranslation as even an Israeli official agreed when pressed.

Quote:
In a reminder that Persian rhetoric is not always easy for English-speakers to interpret, a senior Israeli official has acknowledged that Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, never actually said that Israel “must be wiped off the map.”

Those words were attributed to Mr. Ahmadinejad in 2005, in English translations of his speech to a “World Without Zionism” conference that October. As my colleague Ethan Bronner reported the next year, one problem was translating a metaphorical turn of phrase in Persian that has no exact English equivalent — there was, for instance, no mention of a map — and there was a heated debate about whether the original statement was a threat or a prediction.

Last week, Teymoor Nabili of Al Jazeera suggested during an interview with Dan Meridor, Israel’s minister of intelligence and atomic energy, that Mr. Ahmadinejad’s rhetorical flourish had been misinterpreted. “This idea that Iran wants to wipe Israel out,” Mr. Nabili said, “now that’s a common trope that is put about by a lot of people in Israel, a lot of people in the United States, but as we know Ahmadinejad didn’t say that he plans to exterminate Israel, nor did he say that Iran’s policy is to exterminate Israel.”

In response, Mr. Meridor said that Mr. Ahmadinejad and Iran’s ruling cleric, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had said repeatedly “that Israel is an unnatural creature, it will not survive. They didn’t say, ‘We’ll wipe it out,’ you’re right, but, ‘It will not survive.’ ”

Mr. Meridor also pointed out that Iran’s leaders have continued to deny Israel’s right to exist and used highly inflammatory terms to describe the state. After Ayatollah Khamenei compared Israel to a cancerous tumor in February — adding, it “should be cut off” — Mr. Meridor noted those remarks were echoed by the president just last month. “Israel is unnatural, it will not exist, it’s on the verge of collapse,” Mr. Meridor said. “When you hear this from these people, you need to take it seriously.”

As the Guardian columnist Jonathan Steele explained in 2006, a more direct translation of Mr. Ahmadinejad’s remarks would be: “this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time,” echoing a statement once made by the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

source

InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Oct, 2012 12:35 pm
@Foofie,
Foofie wrote:

InfraBlue wrote:

Here's a clue for you, we're in the Twenty-First Century, not the Sixteenth, nor even the Nineteenth one. Get with the times.



Only 67 years ago the Holocaust occurred. And, today Iran talks about extinguishing the one place on this planet that Jews can live according to their faith, without being a minority. If you think Jews, in the minds of many a European, are not expendable in current "times," you be wrong, Blue.


Do you have the capacity to put together a coherent argument?

You jump from Ottoman repression of the Palestinians to the Holocaust. What, exactly, is the point you're trying to make?

Quote:

InfraBlue wrote:

...That Israel may have learned ethnocentrism from Europe on a possible two-thousand year learning curve of state sponsored anti-Semitism does not justify the Zionists' discrimination against and oppression of the Palestinian peoples.


And, why be that, Blue? Make an ethical argument, like in an ethics college course!


That you have to ask is simply astounding. It’s pretty simple really, bad things learnt do not justify bad behavior. To put it in simpler terms, bad things do not justify bad things.

It seems your mother was derelict in her duties concerning your moral upbringing.
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Tue 2 Oct, 2012 01:02 pm
@InfraBlue,
You wrote,
Quote:
That you have to ask is simply astounding. It’s pretty simple really, bad things learnt do not justify bad behavior. To put it in simpler terms, bad things do not justify bad things.

It seems your mother was derelict in her duties concerning your moral upbringing.


amen! Mr. Green Idea Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Evil or Very Mad Shocked Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
vikorr
 
  0  
Reply Tue 2 Oct, 2012 02:18 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
They become more "expendable" when they treat Palestinians like they were treated during WWII. Get with the program.
That's a rather over the top comparison.

Quote:
When you take away their homes and property, you take away their lives.
So we are now talking about some(as in, not the majority) Palestinians now, rather than 'Palestinians', or are we talking about the dispossessed Palestinians during the founding of the current State of Israel?

And are you referring to current actions, or the actions in setting up Israel?

Generalised statements are well and fine in debate, until you misuse them.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 04:04:35