@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:Don't you think it's ridiculous that someone on the terrorist watch list
can be barred from boarding a plane, but not from buying a gun?
Yes, I certainly
don 't think that is "ridiculous".
Did u read my comments on that point, Izzy??
( See footnote
* for your convenient reference, below. )
(Altho it is obvious that whoever chooses to arm himself
will do so,
regardless of the state of the law
or the law of the State, as thay do for marijuana or heroin),
government
cannot screw any citizen out of his Constitutional rights.
That very clearly can
not be accomplished by an agency of government
putting his name on a
LIST. If it were
possbile for government to succeed in doing that,
then the Supreme Law of the Land woud be less than a joke; the political power of government
woud be infinite, like Saddam or Stalin, forever
unrestrained.
We woud
NOT have a free country.
Additionally, there is nothing in that Supreme Law
that expressly entitles him to fly, whereas there
IS a provision,
expressly
disempowering government from interfering
with his personal armament. Government explicitly has
NO jurisdiction to do that,
any more than it can force him to read the NY Times
or to go to Church against his will.
Matters of defensive personal armament
were explicitly put
beyond the reach of government,
altho that is not necessarily true of flying. U cannot find an enumerated
right to fly in the Supreme Law of the Land.
I submit that the right of any person to defend his life
is much
more FUNDAMENTAL than any other right; it is existential.
I do concede that Congress has been granted control of Interstate Commerce,
including flying planes over State lines, but no government in America,
including Congress, was awarded jurisdiction over matters of personal armament,
any more than it was awarded control over any citizen 's religious beliefs.
When the Bill of Rights was enacted, in 1791,
there were
NO police anywhere in the USA,
nor were there any in England, either, until the next century.
( Private citizens did hire watchmen.)
Accordingly, everyone had always been expected to take care of himself.
Some American colonies had gun control, requiring the citizens
to be well armed, on their way to Church or to work,
for safety 's sake, in the same spirit as today 's seatbelt requirements.
David
* . . . being gunless can get him
KILLED by man or beast.
A citizen can get on that watch list for no defined reason
(without being informed that he is on it)
and it can be impossible to get off that list.
When someone else with the same name
has gotten on the list, other folks with that name have been screwn.
It has taken them ridiculous amounts of time & lawyers' fees to get off of it.
Ted Kennedy got rejected at an airport
for being on that list. The Senator had trouble getting off it.
Maybe it was because he drank too much while airborne. I dunno.
Anyway, defense of your life is
more important than flying.
A citizen cannot be screwn out of his Constitutional rights simply
by FBI putting him on a list. The Constitution
out-ranks the FBI.