@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
gungasnake wrote:The case in which the kid was shot is an aberration and the person involved appears to be a very loose cannon who has just made life much harder for everybody out there who has some real need for concealed carry.
For all the world it sounds like he picked a fight with the kid, lost it, and then pulled out a gun and killed the kid. It wasn't that long ago in the US when a person who started a fist fight and lost it was expected to take whatever ass beating was involved like a man and not pull out a gun and kill somebody.
Cycloptichorn wrote:I don't think there's any evidence that the kid even fought back.
At all. Unless Mr. Zimmerman had some sort of defensive wounds or sign of a struggle,
I think it's pretty clear that he just cold capped him.
Cycloptichorn
So, if there is
NO evidence,
then
u presume the worst against the defendant in the Cycloworld, right ???????
Yes, because an unarmed kid who weighed a hundred pounds less than his assailant is dead, and there's
no evidence he was doing anything wrong at all. Not only that, his assailant was specifically ignoring police instructions by following and confronting the kid.
The burden of proof, when there's a dead body, should fall on the person who admittedly killed him, to prove that he was somehow in danger.
Quote:From that, I dissent.
That's because you have fantasies of killing people yourself.
Cycloptichorn