@chai2,
chai2 wrote:Well, since we're officially off topic, I do have a sincere question for you olga....
Let's say you are really disgusted at a truly horrible person, but simply saying they are "horrible", "terrible", "dispicable" etc does not begin to express the emotions evoked, or conveys the severity of what the person did/how you felt.
Can you not imagine a time when the most eloquent, sophisticated words do not fully express your meaning?
When I have on the rare occasion used that word, it's because there is no other that will do, without watering down the meaning.
Of course you may say one must search for an alternative word, but to be honest, the worlds a messy place,
and messy words are needed, and are at more times more appropriate than trying to be gentile.
Loyalty
COUNTS for something!
I wanna speak up in DEFENSE of the good name of vaginas!
I have always thawt well of them n rather
favor them.
I deem them to be a lot
better than the thummer downer.
U shud not try to discredit them, Bear! ( What did
THAY ever do to
U ?? )
Arguably, without them, the subject matter of this thread woud not have been
forthcoming. Yes?
I also wanna express support for loyalty to logic and to specificity.
If u get mad at your dog for causing a mess in your house,
u shud not accuse him of being a duck, nor a starfish, nor a Democrat.
Rather, he is a messy fellow.
David