@firefly,
"Mary isn't causing you to miss Stacy's wedding. It's your inability to handle seeing her again, with her fiancé, that's the reason Stacy fears you will probably get drunk and create unpleasant "drama" at her wedding. It might actually be good for you to see Mary with her fiancé, perhaps then the reality might really sink in for you--she's gone from your life, despite your constant obsessing about her--but your inability to fully accept the end of the relationship, without becoming unhinged, has caused both Mary and Stacy to not have to want to deal with your emotional melodramas and your neediness. It's your emotional problems that are crapping up your friendships."
I told you what happened when Mary left. She fed me full of all this crap about how our friendship was important to her. She said things like "This isn't goodbye, you're not losing me.", "I want to work on our friendship." I have emails, and texts still.
I actually believed what she was saying. I told you before, I tried for months to talk to her. Swallowed my pride and tried to be an adult, tried to salvage our friendship. Every time I tried, no matter how nice I was to her, she responded with anger and refused to talk to me.
Maybe it wouldn't be such a hard thing to do to see her again IF we had been able to talk prior to Stacy's wedding. IF Mary had actually meant the words she said when she told me that she wanted to work on our friendship.
But Mary didn't have any intention of ever talking to me again when she left. She had no intention of salvaging our friendship as she said she did. Mary simply wanted an easier way of exiting. Like I said before, it's easier to tell someone you want to be single, and that you still care about them than to tell them the truth, that you don't love them or you love someone else.
Mary was a liar. Plain and simple.
Calamity Jane: "You reap what you sow, or simply put, it's karma!"
So if Karma exists, why isn't it biting Mary in the ass? She's certainly no more a saint than I am.
I actually was really affected by the very last post you posted firefly. I read it several times. I want to believe in alot of what you said there. I don't want to inflate your ego, but that post was very hard for me to read because I don't want to let go of my dream. I want you to be right.
The one thing I don't understand though is why didn't Mary have to do all these same things in order to meet someone else? She didn't have to take personal stock, change her attitudes and thinking. She didn't have to do any soul searching, personal inventory, or make big changes in her life to meet someone. Neither did my fiancee. And Mary has a whole host of psychiatric issues related to her undiagnosed bipolar disorder. She fully admits she has emotional problems, problems which have in the past led to her sabotaging her own interpersonal relationships.
Now how can I look at the dichotomy inherent in our two situations, and from a LOGICAL standpoint not draw the conclusion that because Mary is a woman, and women are more desired she doesn't have to put forth as much effort? In fact I doubt she put any effort at all into meeting that guy.
That's a logical conclusion firefly. How can you disagree with my reasoning? How can you tell me it makes sense that I have to make all these huge changes, when someone with just as many emotional and psychological problems doesn't have to? When that person gets the dream I desire without having to compromise herself or work hard for it at all?
"If you can't emotionally handle being there in an adult manner you should not attend."
If the shoe were on the other foot, would this be true? If I was engaged, and Mary was alone, would she feel comfortable attending? What if Jack was there too and he was also engaged?
It's all about game playing. This is Mary AGAIN exerting her power over men by "winning" against me. In public. Because whether I go or not, she gets to be the winner. Just like how she got to be the winner in public when she twisted my arm so hard to make sure I took her to the company Christmas party so she could "win" against Jack.
"The world will not end if you don't go to Stacy's wedding."
I know. But do I get to be a human being and feel deeply sad that I'll miss it? Stacy was my sunshine for so long. She has and always will make me feel better just by her presence. She's probably the most positive person I've ever known in my life. I don't know if I'll ever see her again after I move. Do I ever get to be allowed to feel human when I react to things???? You make it seem like I should process everything like a robot, deciding the best course of action like it's a math equation instead of taking into account my histories with these people and the emotional weight that comes with saying goodbye to them. Isn't there anybody in your life who makes you feel better just by their presence? If you had to say goodbye to them and you weren't sure if your friendship with them was severed for good; would you be able to separate yourself from your own emotional reaction???
" It might actually be good for you to see Mary with her fiancé, perhaps then the reality might really sink in for you"
Again, you expect me to separate myself from my own self and process this like a robot. No, it will most certainly not be good for me to see this, especially as part of my last memory of all these people.