@hawkeye10,
Quote:Given the lack of justice in the NCAA process and penalty a hanging is exactly what happened. The members of the mob feel good today. I am disturbed by this yet another example of how far America has fallen into barbarity.
We used to be better than this.
You simply refuse to see the role that Joe and others played in this. Did you read the Freeh report? The one commissioned by PSU itself? Did you read the letter the NCAA wrote to PSU? Answer the four questions and then defend their actions. We didn't used to be better. We used to be worse. Years ago this would have been covered up. You can call me names and tell me how stupid I am about this if you want, but I'm not the one with the perception problem.
I am indeed sad for those left behind and the innocent who will now suffer. I am much sadder for the victims of Sandusky, especially those who would have been spared his actions had certain people acted back in 1998 and 2001.
Here is the crux of the NCAA letter:
1. How has Penn State and/or its employees complied with the Articles of the Constitution and bylaws that are cited in this letter?
from the bylaws --- "individuals employed by or associated with member institutions for the administration, the conduct or the coaching of intercollegiate athletics are, in the final analysis, teachers of young people.
Their responsibility is an affirmative one, they must do more than avoid improper conduct or questionable acts. Their own moral values must be so certain and positive that those younger and more pliable will be influenced by a fine example. Much more is expected of them than of the less critically placed citizen. "
2. How has Penn State exercised institutional control over the issues identified in and related to the Grand Jury Report? Were there procedures in place that were or were not followed? What are the institution's expectations and policies to address the conduct that has been alleged in this matter upon discovery by any party?
3. Have each of the alleged persons to have been involved or have notice of the issues identified in and related to the Grand Jury Report behaved consistent with the principles and requirements governing ethical conduct and honesty?
4. What policies and procedures does Penn State have in place to monitor, prevent and detect issues identified in and related to the Grand Jury Report or to take disciplinary or corrective action if such behaviors are found?