@hawkeye10,
Quote:The ex pres has refuted multiple claims fron the Freeh report.
The ex board chairman also disputes some key findings of the Freeh report.
Quote:The Penn State storm that started to brew yesterday following the Express-Times report on Board of Trustees' anger with Rodney Erickson's handling of the sanctions ultimately ended how we thought it would; much ado about nothing. Or, rather, much ado about something, just not something they were willing to get involved in.
At first the issue seemed to solid. The Board requires the school president to get his major moves, you know, like accepting NCAA sanctions that will hobble the football team, approved. As we saw Monday, Erickson did no such thing when he decided to settle with the NCAA, arriving at the vacated wins, postseason ban, scholarship reductions and fines as the answer to their cover-up problem. Onward State reported that several Board members, including Anthony Lubrano and former player Adam Taliaffero, questioned whether Erickson violated Standing Order IV
It would appear he most certainly did. The Board, with that in hand, had the power to make something happen. It seemed, even if just for a second, that they were looking to take the fight to the NCAA, through their own president.
Maybe they would combat the notion that the NCAA should not have absolute power to go off protocol and hand down penalties without their own investigation and findings. Maybe they would combat the very idea that the NCAA could even truly rule in a case that did not directly involve extra benefits, competition and/or eligibility. Maybe, just maybe, they were gearing up to fight the piling on by the NCAA, an organization that just took credit for a no-brainer win.
However, that would not be the case. Once Erickson let them know about the four-year death penalty that the NCAA threatened him with, if he didn't submit to their will, ESPN reported; the Board of Trustees fell in line.
Just like Erickson did just days before them
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1273222-penn-state-scandal-board-of-trustees-opts-for-path-of-least-resistance
The NCAA used the playbook of the typical DA here, threaten with massive unjust punishment in the expectation that the coward opposition will sign on the bottom line for mearly significantly unjust punishment. Penn St was willing to sign anything, they were likely roadkill the moment they accepted the Freeh report as fact, but they might have had a chance at justice had they been willing to fight for it.
Those connected to Penn St just got revictimized by a new batch of University leaders, who are as bad as the old batch at looking out for their interests.