@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:Yeah, but they had to get the Supreme Court in there to shut down the re-count in order to make it work.
Nonsense; u are just not enuf of a man to face the truth
and u r certainly
unwilling to be honest in expressing it, u
filthy liar.
There were many re-re-counts. I remember sweating all of them out.
Gore
never won
ANY of the re-counts,
including the
ex post facto re-count by the many
left-leaning media
who went to Florida and did their
OWN counting. All the hanging chads coud not save him.
If he
HAD won the press's re-count, or any re-count,
that 'd have been a bigger story than Lindbergh's crossing the Atlantic Ocean.
I have a hunch that one of those newspapers woud have mentioned it.
Algore
NEVER even
ALLEGED that he won any of the re-counts.
( If he
HAD actually won any of them, of course,
THEN
he 'd have insisted that thay
STOP all further counting. )
Setanta wrote:Bush was a minority president in his first term--he got fewer votes than Gore.
W got more votes than Gore in the Electoral College, where it counts; no hanging chads.
W got more votes in Florida than Gore did.
W did
not get as many votes
nationwide than Gore did,
but Setanta got yet another run-on sentence:
Setanta wrote:Bush was a minority president in his first term--he got fewer votes than Gore.
Is Setanta obsessed with writing with defective grammar?
( Yes; I know,
fonetic spelling, yada, yada, yada. . . . )
David