@Frank Apisa,
Quote:Actually, you did. You can check...it is there in black and white.
I did not and it is not. If you didn't understand what I did say there is nothing I can do about it.
It amused me no end when the atheists who caused you to flounce off A2K for a few years didn't put my point to you. I couldn't decide whether they were unintelligent enough to not have the capacity or whether they were intelligent enough to know that if they did I would tear their own position to shreds.
Quote:Actually, you didn't. You can check...it is NOT there in black and white.
I put it in another and slightly more expanded way. I'm well aware that I didn't use the exact formulation I had used previously.
That's right. As sure as eggs. It is ridiculous to imply that human interaction is suspended at the same time as interacting with humans using words evolved in human interaction.
Odd how you never responded to my saying that human progress depends upon guessing.
Quote:I would be shocked to death if it were...and a guy with as much intelligence as you, Spendius, ought be just as shocked if it were.
Suggest an older one. There's nothing sophistical in Homer or the cave paintings. And the philosophers of later times would have thought of your sophistry first when pondering the imponderables.
Quote:Well, we agree that it was drivel.
No we don't. I agreed they were drivel assuming your definition of drivel is correct. Which it isn't. Those two posts were not drivel. You just had no answer to them other than the idiotic assertion that they were.
Your saying they were drivel is tautological and thus pure, unadulterated nonsense.
