@reasoning logic,
Quote:Yeah so they do not loose their followers, do to social pressures "that is not the same as coming to a moral understand but rather adapting to social pressures.
Are you CERTAIN this is true? How can you PROVE to me it is? How do you KNOW that this/these is/are the reason(s)?
Quote:This is true about some things but sociopaths could care less about moral values.
It doesn't have a single thing to do with sociopaths...or non sociopaths...Logic...nothing at all
So no one cares? As you "think" everyone is a sociopath?
Of course this is incorrect or not true...
But you "think" it is...Because you also "think" that everyone is a sociopath....
Some people are not sociopaths but just do not know what the best method is right now, because it is constantly changing, even the Church is...As we have just established....And there are many sociopaths...Who are sociopaths because they believe their moral views are correct, and they are just not moral to anyone else who most would consider are moral....
Yes, there are sociopaths who do not care about morals...And there are sociopaths who would say they do....
I am not a sociopath....And I would say that you should not think of yourself as one....So do you really know what a sociopath thinks is moral or immoral?
And do you know if they care or do not?
Or is it just our views from the outside, that they are immoral, or do not care?...Because what they think is moral...Is immoral to "us"?
The point of all of this is...That just because someone is not a sociopath...Or cares about morality does not mean that everyone automatically knows what the exact correct things to do are...Before it is presented...About every situation...Or how to change everything wrong to correct in the blink of an eye...
Unless you have a belief system to teach you prudence, so that you can rationalize moral and immoral about everything...
Your very evolution supports this....And even creationism does...If the church has to modify itself, based upon outside influences to show that it actually cares about the world, morailty, and civilization in general...
And it is being truthful that is does not have every answer....As you never could, unless you learn to understand things in prudent ways, so you could understand how something is moral or immoral...The very first time your thinking is exposed too it...
And moral and immoral are always going to be subjective on EVERY level...And no church could give a clear answer about moral and immoral about EVERYTHING...That is why it is up to people to understand for themselves what prudence is, and what things of moral are, and what are not...by themselves, but it could only be done by subjective beliefs...Athesim does nothing at all to help solve this....And people just say they already know...And do not need a superstition...But that is because they have beliefs...Because they do not know every situation that will ever be presented in the future, but if they found out about it....their mind would be made up as soon as it registered in their brain because of a belief about it....a lack of belief would do absolutely nothing at all, and helps you in no particular way at all....
Simply because there are things to consider moral, and immoral that are becomming new every single day...
Abortion would have never been thought about 5,000 years ago....Because they wanted to procreate....
And 10,000 years from now there will be things to consider to be moral or immoral, that will exist, that we have absolutley no clue about at the time being...
Unless someone has a belief, and then could say why they would find it to be moral or immoral....without actually knowing the answer with certainty...
But you reject this notion and so does every atheist...
So what would atheism do that would help us more than a belief would?